It
was fashionable in Hollywood, at one time, to produce movies that
have alternate
endings. Hollywood executives hoped that, by trying out two or
more endings for the same movie on test audiences, they could
determine which one viewers enjoyed most, which might translate into
more ticket sales (i .e., dollars) at the box office.
For
short story writers and novelists, however, there may be other
benefits
to devising possible alternate endings. In doing so, however, authors
should follow Aristotle's dictum
(and Edgar Allan Poe's advice)
that a story's ending should end in a manner that does not destroy
the integrity of the rest of the plot.
Devising
possible alternate endings to a story can also assist writers in
selecting the most appropriate, effective, and memorable ending
possible from an array of alternatives.
In
addition, imagining possible alternate endings can, perhaps, improve
the story, because a new possibility might round out, explain, or
otherwise complete the narrative in a more believable or otherwise
satisfying manner than the original ending. (We're speaking, now, of
works in progress, rather than published, stories.)
Imagining
alternate endings could also produce unexpected or better twist
endings than the one a writer originally had in mind.
Current
ending: Raut, who has cuckolded Horrocks, is doomed when a
blast-furnace cone lowers him into the furnace, while Horrocks pelts
the adulterer with hot coals.
Alternate
ending: Horrocks seizes Raut by the arm, shoving him into the
path of an oncoming railway tram. (This incident occurs earlier in
the story, but, at this point, Horrocks is terrorizing Raut and, at
the last minute, pulls him to safety; revised, the original story
would end with this incident, without Horrocks pulling Raut from the
tram's path.)
Current
ending: An entry in Morgan's diary reveals that the creature he
hunts is invisible because its color is imperceptible to the human
eye.
Alternate
ending: Both Morgan's friend Harker, who witnessed Morgan's death
and Morgan himself are insane, the former because of his fantastic
testimony at the coroner's inquest concerning the cause of Morgan's
death, the latter because, in writing of the incident in his diary,
he described it in a manner that is consistent with Harker's account
of the occurrence. On suspicion of having killed, and possible
brainwashed Morgan, Harker is arrested and held for trial.
Current
ending: Horsemen frighten off the werewolf guarding and keeping
an English hotel guest warm in a forest and take him back to the
hotel; they were dispatched at the request of a Transylvanian count
named Dracula.
Alternate
ending: The horsemen arrive to find the Englishman's throat torn
out by the werewolf feasting upon his corpse.
"The Signalman" by Charles Dickens
Current
ending: The narrator learns that a signal-man, seemingly
mesmerized by something he saw, was struck and killed by an
approaching train after ignoring the engineer's repeated warnings to
get off the track.
Alternate
ending: The train strikes the signal-man, but investigators
cannot find his body; on the anniversary of his supposed death, the
signal-man again appears on the track and is struck, but, afterward,
investigators cannot find a body.
Chillers
and Thrillers has devoted quite a bit of space to several
articles on Tzvetan Todorov's insightful analysis of the literary
fantastic. At this point, despite the oversimplification that
results, we can say, for Todorov, the fantastic usually resolves
itself into the explained and the unexplained. The former he calls
“uncanny”; the latter, “marvelous.” Only when there is no
resolution, one way or another, does the fantastic remain fantastic.
We
also noted that, to write such a story, an author must allow either
of two understandings of the action: either reason or science
can explain the phenomena, bizarre though they may, as natural events
or the strange phenomena are beyond explanation and, as such,
may actually be of an otherworldly or supernatural origin. The
tension between these two alternatives creates and maintains
suspense. It is only when the story shows that the action is natural
(explicable by reason or science) or supernatural (inexplicable by
reason or science) that the story itself is no longer fantastic, but
either uncanny or marvelous, respectively.
It
helps, therefore, to know how scientists explain seemingly fantastic
phenomena, such as (for example) ghosts, vampires, werewolves, and
zombies.
Werewolves
are, like most beasts, especially hairy. Sometimes, so do human
beings, due to hypertrichosis,
a genetic disorder that results in the covering of the face and body
in thick hair resembling an animal's fur. Before genetics was
understood (about the turn of the twentieth century), this condition
could have led people to believe that victims of hypertrichosis were
men or women who'd transformed into wolves—in other words,
werewolves (in Old
English, “wer” means “man” and “wulf” means
“wolf”).
Porphyria,
a condition mentioned in a previous post, could have contributed to
people's belief, in earlier times, in werewolves: the condition “is
characterized by extreme sensitivity to light (thus encouraging its
victims to only go out at night), seizures, anxiety, and other
symptoms.” (Often, scenes of people transforming into werewolves
include behavior that closely resembles seizures, as does this scene
from the movie The
Howling [1977].)
A
medical condition known as clinical
lycanthropy is more about the mind that the body: it causes its
victims to believe
that they are werewolves, which, in turn, causes them to act
accordingly. Serial killer Peter Stubbe is a case in point. He
believed he owned “a belt of wolfskin that allowed him to change
into a wolf.” His confessions to his murders were extracted under
torture, as his “flesh was . . . ripped out with hot pincers and
his limbs [were] crushed with stones.”
Once
again, scientific accounts of the werewolf phenomenon offer
suggestions about characters, including therapists, psychologists,
psychiatrists, police officers and detectives, medical doctors and
specialists, and even torturers. In addition, the offices of these
personnel might occur as settings in some scenes, but, depending on
the century in which a story is set, settings might also feature
dungeons, torture chambers, prisons, or mental asylums. Of course,
forests are a virtual certainty with regard to the settings of such
stories.
There
have been many movies about werewolves, including Silver
Bullet (1985),
which is based on Stephen King's 1983 novella Cycle
of the Werewolf.
Such imaginary beasts have also been popular with well-known short
story authors, Robert Louis Stevenson (“Olalla”
[1887]), Algernon Blackwood (“The
Camp of the Dog” [1908]), Bram Stoker (“Dracula's
Guest” [1914)], and Robert E. Howard (“Wolfshead”
[1968]). Alexander Dumas wrote a novella on the subject, The
Wolf-Leader(1857),
and Guy Endore penned a novel, The
Werewolf of Paris
(1933). (There's even a werewolf romance subgenre!)
Studying these stories will show readers how such writers
give new blood, so to speak, to a truly ancient horror trope.
In
our next post, we'll take a peek at what science says about zombies.
I can't say whether Erle
Stanley Gardner used alliteration as a way of prompting plots, but
some of the titles of his Perry Mason novels sure did—as did even
more—most, in fact—of the CBS television series' episodes—could
have suggested story lines.
Gardner himself created
such alliterative titles as
The Case of the Lucky
Legs
The Case of the
Caretaker's Cat
The Case of the
Dangerous Dowager
The Case of the
Shoplifter's Show
The Case of the
Perjured Parrot
The Case of the Haunted
Husband
The Case of the
Drowning Duck
The Case of the Crooked
Candle
The Case of the
Black-eyed Blonde
The Case of the
Borrowed Brunette
The Case of the
Cautious Coquette
The Case of the
Negligent Nymph
The Case of the Fiery
Fingers
The Case of the
Moth-eaten Mink
The Case of the
Grinning Gorilla
The Case of the
Hesitant Hostess
The Case of the
Restless Redhead
The Case of the
Glamorous Ghost
The Case of the
Terrified Typist
The Case of the Demure
Defendant
The Case of the Lucky
Loser
The Case of the Daring
Decoy
The Case of the
Mythical Monkeys
The Case of the Singing
Skirt
The Case of the Waylaid
Wolf
The Case of the
Duplicate Daughter
The Case of the Shapely
Shadow
The Case of the
Spurious Spinster
The Case of the Blonde
Bonanza
The Case of the
Stepdaughter's Secret
The Case of the Amorous
Aunt
The Case of the Daring
Divorcee
The Case of the Phantom
Fortune
The Case of the
Horrified Heirs
The Case of the
Troubled Trustee
The Case of the
Beautiful Beggar
The Case of the Worried
Waitress
The Case of the
Careless Cupid
The Case of the
Fabulous Fake
The
titles also often invoke mystery or suspense or both. Why are the
legs lucky? Why is the loser lucky? What is the stepdaughter's
secret? Why is the waitress worried?
Most
of these titles also contain adjectives that characterize specific
types of fictional character, many of them women: blonde, brunette,
coquette, nymph, redhead, typist, daughter, spinster, aunt, divorcee,
waitress. Often, in the television series, at least, the character
identified in the title became Mason's client and the defendant in a
murder trial.
While
identifying a type of character, each of the titles also suggest
several questions. The answers to these questions may imply still
other questions, or, at times, they may hint at plot twists or even a
resolution.
The
Case of the Haunted Husband: Who
is the husband? Who is his wife? Why is he haunted? In what way is he
haunted? Has h done something that frightens him or haunts him with
guilt? Maybe he murdered someone. Maybe he had an affair with
someone? Maybe he murdered another woman with whom he had an affair.
If so, who is this other woman? Where did they meet? What attracted
them to one another? Did they break off their relationship? Did the
wife know about the affair or find out about it? Lieutenant Tragg
might consider such knowledge a motivation for the wife to have
killed the mistress. Perhaps the husband didn't kill the other woman,
after all. Maybe she was killed by the wife of a previous husband
with whom she had had an affair, a wife who's tracked her down to
kill her. Was the husband or his current wife the killer's fall guy?
(Since Gardner was writing Perry Mason novels, Gardner also had to
answer the question, How is Perry going to prove his client is
innocent of the charges that the police will lodge against her?)
The
Case of the Borrowed Brunette:
Who is the brunette? Who borrowed her? How was she borrowed? For what
purpose was she borrowed? Was she returned? If so, to whom? An
intriguing title, the name of this story conjures up all kinds of
possibilities. Did the woman look like another woman? Was she
borrowed to impersonate another brunette? Was she, perhaps, killed so
the other brunette could disappear and start a new life or escape a
prison sentence? Did her boyfriend or her husband plan to kill the
other woman and run away with the borrowed brunette? Was the borrowed
brunette a model, a call girl, a wealthy businesswoman, a woman from
a man's past? (Remember, too, that because Gardner was writing Perry
Mason novels, Gardner also had to answer the question, How is Perry
going to prove his client is innocent of the charges that the police
will lodge against her?)
The
Case of the Worried Waitress:
Who is the waitress? Who or what worries her? Why is she worried?
What, if anything, does she do to eliminate the cause of her
worries—or what do the police believe she has done? Is she a
victim? A witness to a murder? Did someone she served as a waitress
leave incriminating evidence behind? Did she see or hear something
she shouldn't have while serving a diner? (As always, since Gardner
was writing Perry Mason novels, Gardner also had to answer the
question, How is Perry going to prove his client is innocent of the
charges that the police will lodge against her?)
Although
the plots of the episodes of the television series may differ from
those of the novels, the episodes provide at least one way writers
answered such questions, generated a plot, and solved the cases.
Summaries of the episodes on the Perry
Mason TV Series wiki
indicate that, in The
Case of the Haunted Husband,
the series' writers came up with this approach:
Hitchhiker
Claire Olger is charged with grand theft auto and manslaughter when
the driver of the car she's riding in hits a truck, killing the truck
driver, then flees the scene, leaving Claire to take the blame.
Perry agrees to help
Claire and eventually does locate the missing driver. Trouble is,
he's dead. Burger drops the previous charges against Claire and files
a new one: first degree murder. A second murder only complicates
things more.
Eva
Martell gets a part, not on stage but impersonating Helen Reynolds, a
woman she has never met. She is paid extremely well and given a
beautiful apartment to live in with her Aunt Agnes as long as she
continues the charade. Still, Eva suspects foul play in paradise, and
seeks the advice of a good lawyer.
Perry steps in and meets
with the real Helen Reynolds, who swears she is not doing anything
illegal, but cannot reveal her motives. That’s fine until they find
that dead body in her apartment. . . [.]
The
Case of the Worried Waitress [sic],
by Erle Stanley Gardner[,] 'The 'Foreword' [sic]
is dedicated to Marshall Houts, who gave up a lucrative law practice
to become an investigator for the Court of Last Resort. Houts
investigated several murder cases in which innocent men had been
wrongfully convicted, and brought about a satisfactory conclusion.
Houts created 'Trauma', [sic]
a publication that deals with the field of legal medicine. Forensic
medicine applies to many cases, from accidents to the more publicized
murders. Perry Mason and Della Street have lunch at a restaurant, and
are served by a new waitress Katherine Ellis. The next morning Kit
Ellis visits Mason for a consultation about her Aunt Sophia. Kit's
parents were killed in an automobile accident, she was left
penniless, and moved in with Aunt Sophia (who met a divorced man, and
turned over her money to him). After he died of heat stroke, his
first wife took everything (their divorce wasn't final). Perry Mason
said this could be a partnership, and Sophia could claim half of the
property. Kit says Aunt Sophia has a hatbox filled with cash, and she
is afraid of burglars. Perry advises her to move out for her own
safety. Soon Perry gets a phone call from Kit Ellis; she is being
accused of theft by a Stuart Baxley. Baxley hired a private detective
to get fingerprints from the hatbox. Paul Drake said this is
difficult. But Perry Mason knows that Macdonell Associates of Corning
NY have invented a method to do this with magnetic dust (Chapter 4).
They learn that Aunt Sophia Atwood is in the hospital, someone hit
her on the head with a five-cell flashlight. Kit Ellis had gone back
to the house by taxi at night to retrieve her shoes and clothing. Lt.
Tragg arrests Kit Ellis at Perry's office (Chapter 9). Mason and Paul
Drake visit another person who knows Sophia Atwood (Chapter 10).
Perry bait a trap with a seemingly missing will (Chapter 11). Does
golf get blamed for things that are the result of human carelessness,
stupidity , and foolishness (Chapter 12)? Perry assigns an
investigation to Paul Drake: put a female operative at the Gillco
Company who can pose as a blind woman (Chapter 14). The Preliminary
Hearing begins with Stuart Baxley. Perry destroys his credibility in
his cross-examination. The judge expresses doubt as well (Chapter
15). Then Stuart Baxley changes his story again! In Chapter 16 Perry
thinks of a theory that can explain the strange events at that house.
Perry and Paul find a cache of money, and are found out by Lt. Tragg
(Chapter 17). In Chapter 18 Perry brings in a surprise witness who
reveals shocking secrets! Lt. Tragg admits fingerprints on the
flashlight do not match Perry's client, and do match fingerprints on
the water cooler, but are from an unknown person. Perry later hands
Lt. Tragg some fingerprints to analyze. Kit Ellis is freed to rejoin
her Aunt Sophia (Chapter 19).
Gardner's
technique—and, let's admit it, his use of alliteration is
fun—can work for any genre,
horror included. Let's make up a couple of alliterative horror titles
(since Chillers and Thrillers
is a blog about The Theory and Practice of Writing Horror
Fiction, after all):
The Case of the
Ravenous Rats: Why are the rats
ravenous? Where do they live? Are they captives? If so, who has them?
Why are they being kept? Are they to be used in a mass attack on
someone? When? Where? Why? If the rats are not ravenous, where did
they come from? A research laboratory? The site of an nuclear
reactor's failure? The military? (Maybe the rodents are living
weapons?) Are they genetic mutants? How are they stopped? By whom?
(Another way to approach plotting from alliterative titles is to consider stories that actually involve ravenous rats, such as Edgar Allan Poe's "The Pit and the Pendulum"; Bram Stoker's "Burial of the Rats" and "The Judge's House"; or my own "A Job Well Done.")
The Case of the
Grotesque Gallery: What's
grotesque about the gallery? What exhibits are shown in it? Is it a
private or a public gallery? Does it exhibit corpses as sculptures,
paintings made with body fluids for paint? Do tableaux depict
perverted acts? Are the owners insane artists? Failed artists? Are
their models alive? If so, are they held against their will? Do the
same ones appear in multiple works of art? Do the paintings or
sculptures that include them show them as victims (or perpetrators)
progressive acts of torture? Do the artworks depict past—or
future—catastrophes? Why does the grotesque gallery exist?
The Case of the
Screaming Skull: Part of this
title actually includes the title of a 1958 indie horror film, The
Screaming Skull, giving us an
example of how an alliterative title might have suggested a plot; the
synopsis is courtesy of Wikipedia:
Over
a scene [sic]
of an opening coffin, a narrator explains that the film's climax is
so terrifying that it may kill the viewer, while reassuring the
audience that should they die of fright they will receive a free
burial service. Inside the coffin is a card that reads "Reserved
for You". [sic]
Newlyweds Jenni . . . and
Eric . . . move into Eric's palatial country home. Jenni is Eric's
second wife; his first wife Marion died when she accidentally slipped
and hit her head on the edge of a decorative pond on the estate. At
the home they meet Eric's friends, the Reverend Snow . . . and his
wife . . . , as well as Mickey . . . , the developmentally disabled
gardener. Eric privately mentions to the Snows that Jenni spent time
in an asylum following the sudden death of both her parents, and Mrs.
Snow reveals that Jenni is very wealthy.
Jenni is disturbed both
by Mickey's belief that Marion's ghost wanders the estate and by
Marion's self-portrait inside the house, which Jenni believes
resembles her mother. When she begins to hear unexplained screaming
noises and see skulls around her house, she believes that Marion is
haunting her. Though Eric speculates to Jenni that Mickey, who was a
childhood friend of Marion and thus dislikes Jenni, may be behind the
trickery, Jenni worries that she is going insane. Eric suggests to
remove Marion's self-portrait from the home. Eric and Jenni take the
painting outside and burn it, later uncovering a skull from the
ashes. Jenni panics at the sight of the skull, but Eric denies that
the skull is there. Jenni faints and Eric withdraws the skull and
hides it, revealing that he has been gaslighting her all along.
Believing she has finally
lost her sanity, Jenni resolves to be committed. She tells Eric that
the entire property will be meticulously searched for the skull as a
last resort. Mickey secretly steals the skull and brings it to Snow
before Eric can retrieve it. That night, Eric prepares to murder
Jenni and stage it as a suicide. Jenni sees Marion's ghost in
Mickey's greenhouse and flees back to the house, where Eric begins
throttling her. The ghost appears and chases Eric outside, corners
and attacks him, drowning him in the decorative pond.
After Jenni regains
consciousness, the Snows arrive. Mrs. Snow comforts a hysterical
Jenni and the Reverend discovers Eric's body in the pond. Some
undisclosed time later, Jenni and the Snows depart from the house.
Reverend Snow declares whether or not Marion's death was an accident
will remain a mystery.
Gardner's plotting
technique (if his alliterative titles really was a plotting
technique, rather than just a fun way of enticing readers to buy his
books) can be used by anyone, for any genre. Why not try it yourself?
There
are probably as many ways to come up with an anthology idea as there
are editors who come up with anthology ideas. In the brief head notes to
his stories in his own anthology of twice-told tales, The Collection,
Bentley Little mentions a few of them. For any who imagined that the
innards of the publishing industry are as confused and messy as those of
a dissected high school biology class frog, his comments on the matter
suggest that such cynics are pretty much right on the money.
The ecology movement gave rise to the notion for one anthology: The Earth Strikes Back
was to be a collection of tales concerning “the negative effects of
pollution, overpopulation, and deforestation” upon the planet, or so
Little supposed, at least, “judging by the title of the book.”
Another anthology, Cold Blood, was also to be centered on a “theme” and its stories were to have been written to “specific guidelines.”
According
to Stephanie Bond, author of “Much Ado About Anthologies,” these
collections “are assembled in various ways,” sometimes as the result of a
group proposal by several authors, sometimes at the suggestion of an
editor, sometimes as a way to test the marketability of an idea, and
sometimes to capitalize upon a specific author’s unusual success.
Usually, they come together because “editors formulate ideas for
anthologies to fill holes they perceive in the market.”
I
submitted a story for an anthology myself. It (the anthology, but my
story also) concerned animals. My story was accepted, but I declined the
invitation, because it was to have appeared in an electronic magazine
and the editor wanted to pay via PayPal. At the time, I preferred
payments by check, the old-fashioned way.
Anthologies
have a common theme, of course, provided by a timely or evergreen
topic, a holiday, an intriguing situation, or any other reasonably good
excuse for a score or more (or fewer) stories by the same or different
authors of the same genre.
Horror movies have also gone the anthology route. Stephen King’s Cat’s Eye and Creepshow
are only two among many. Most follow the simple convention of
sandwiching three of four short movies between an opening prologue that
sets up the theme to be followed and an epilogue that rounds out the
series and provides an appropriate sense of closure.
Were you yourself to publish a
horror anthology, what short stories would you include? Your list
could indicate not only your own interests in the genre, but also
some of the narrative themes, writing techniques, and stylistic
approaches your choice of stories represents, especially if you write
a brief headnote to introduce each story.
My own imaginary anthology
is an eclectic one, featuring some better-known and some lesser-known
stories by well-known authors. A few might be by famous people who
aren't known for writing chillers and thrillers, but who have written
some admirable tales of terror and suspense, and a few others might
be written by relatively unknown authors or by authors who are
relatively unknown, at least, to most American readers.
In alphabetical order (by
author's name), here's the list of the candidates I'd likely include,
some of which might stretch the traditional definition of “horror
story”:
The
color of “the damned thing” is the source of horror in this story
about a creature never seen before among humanity. (You might also
enjoy my two-part commentary on the story, “The
Damned Thing": Bierce's Exercise in Existential Absurdity.”)
This
story shows what the Civil War was like, up close and personal, for the
men who fought it. It's a haunting tale in which death stares the
living in the face.
A
childlike man has trouble fitting in, relying on bodybuilding and
fantasy to get him through the day. His mother, with whom he lives,
hopes his interest will be enough to sustain him—and to protect
her. (You'll also want to read my analysis of this story,
“'Heavy-Set':
Learning from the Masters.”
Similar
to Stephen Crane's short story, “The Open Boat,” the former
British prime minister's tale confronts a pleasure-seeker with the
indifference of nature. (My analysis of this story, “'Man
Overboard': Questioning Nature and Its Creator,” offers food
for thought.)
Four
men in a dinghy learn the lesson of their lives concerning their
place in the cosmic scheme of things. (“Taking
Away the Teddy Bear” provides insights concerning this story,
“Man Overboard,” and other works.)
A
strange landscape. Rumors of vampires. A graveyard in the midst of a
forest. A corpse revived. A werewolf. Military troops. This one has
it all, including a note from the Count of Transylvania, soliciting
assistance in the protection of his “guest.”
Influenced
by Edgar Allan Poe, Wells offers an eerie tale of terror in a haunted
castle, offering an explanation opposite that presented in the film
adaptation of Stephen King's “1408.” Reading Tzvetan Todorov's
analysis of the fantastic and its tendency to be resolved as either
marvelous or uncanny helps in understanding the nuances of both this
story and the film version of King's story.
Fortunately, for those who
may want to read one or more of them, many are available, free,
online, as the links embedded in their titles indicate, or may be
checked out on loan from local public libraries.
Writers of horror fiction
have several ways by which to suggest threatening or hostile
environments.
1. Writers can depict a
setting that is, in itself, bizarre.
I know a homeowner, Bruce,
who cut down all the trees in his yard. He'd had a swimming pool
installed in his backyard, and he was frustrated when, each fall, his
trees dropped their leaves, littering his lawn and the surface of his
new pool. His solution was to chop down not only the trees in his
backyard, but all his trees,
including those in his front and side yards. At no charge, he even
volunteered to cut down the trees of his neighbor, but the neighbor
declined his offer.
Most
of us, I believe, would have said no thanks, because most of us love
trees. They're big, beautiful symbols of life—and they provide
shade. So what if they drop their leaves every autumn? Everybody
poops. (Yes, dead leaves are essentially tree droppings.)
But,
when we're confronted with trees unlike any most of us have ever
seen, trees
that are not only unfamiliar to us but also strange-looking? Then,
maybe we'd give Bruce a call.
A
case in point: the dragon tree (Dracaena cinnabaril),
which thrives on Yemen's remote Socotra Island an on the Canary
Islands. Named for its red
sap, this tree looks as though it was planted upside down, its
limbs resembling roots at the end of which grow clumps of stubby
leaves. In bloom, their blossoms grow among their leaves, looking
pretty much like yellow versions of the former. Unfortunately, the
population of these trees has been greatly reduced and now consists
mostly of only mature trees. Scientists describe the tree's status as
“vulnerable,”
which places it between “near threatened” and “endangered.”
Another
bizarre inhabitant of Socotra Island is the cucumber
tree (Dendrosicyos socotrana).
It has “a bulbous trunk and a small crown,” bearing 10-inch
“round leaves” with “slightly toothed” bristles and inch-long
yellow fruit.
The
bottle tree (Pachypodium lealii Welw)
is also a rather odd-looking specimen, resembling a turnip planted
upside down. This tree grows is indigenous to the Namibia.
The
Juniper Tree (Juniperus phoenicea),
which grows on Spain's El Hierro Island, literally bends over
backward. Some, such as the one shown here, resemble human figures.
Coming unexpectedly upon such a tree at dusk might send a chill up
one's spine.
This
bizarre specimen, the Tree of Tule, a Montezuma cypress (Taxodium
mucronatum)
makes its home in a Oaxaca, Mexico, churchyard. Did it not exist, a
description of its appearance might seem unbelievable. Some see the
shapes of jaguars, elephants, and other animals in the bark of the
ancient tree's trunk, which gives it the nickname “The
Tree of Life.”
This
West Australian boab tree (Adansonia
gregorii
) allegedly doubled
as a jail. Prisoners would be kept inside the tree overnight on their
way from one place to another.
California's
boojum tree (Fouquieria
columnaris) is
tall, exceedingly slender, and nearly leafless. Imagine walking up on
a forest of these in the middle of the desert on a moonlit night.
According to Seri
beliefs, “touching this plant will cause strong winds to blow
(an undesirable state).”
This
kapok tree's strange trunk appears to consist of three branches that
have grown woody “webbing” between one another. The trunk is
broad enough so that two or more thick branches, each pointing in its
own direction, can grow from the same side of the trunk.
The time-space continuum
warp featured toward the end of my urban fantasy novel A WholeFull of World of Hurt, which was inspired by Steve Ditko's
illustrations of the enchanted realms through which Marvel Comics's
Dr. Strange traveled on his astral journeys, is (like Ditko's own
mystical lands) a good illustration of this approach. The execution
of this technique doesn't have to involve the use of surreal imagery,
though, as Shirley Jackson's novel The Haunting of Hill House,
Stephen King's Rose Red and The Shining, and Ray
Bradbury's Dandelion Wine indicate.
2. Another way to suggest
threatening or hostile environments is to make the familiar seem
strange. The strange appearance of the trees we described (above) may
not, in itself, be frightening enough to horrify readers (but their
looks are a start!). Writers need to associate the odd-looking trees
with bizarre origins or give them a back story (such as a legend)
that gives them a horrific provenance. Imagining answers to questions
about some of the trees described above may offer some possibilities.
What, precisely, is
threatening the existence of the dragon tree? Could the tree's name
derive from a source other than the accepted one? Could it have grown
from the spawn of actual (now extinct) dragons, which would account
for its blood-red sap? Perhaps such trees are capable, under the
right circumstances, or spontaneous combustion.
Are the human shapes
discernible in the bent-over-backward juniper trees actual humans
who've been incorporated into tree branches, perhaps through dark
magic? Were they dancers in some sort of fantastic ritual?
Do the animal shapes amid
the bark of the Tree of Tule
actually come to life at times? Do its elephants, jaguars, and other
beasts spring from its bark to do the will of those who conjure them,
returning to their passive, woody state after fulfilling their
summoners' deadly missions?
Is a
character among your adventurers a criminal whose past catches up
with him or her when the band passes the Boab Prison Tree? Is it more
than a jail? Maybe the tree practices its own brand of vigilante
justice, acting as judge, jury, and executioner concerning violent
offenders who've escaped justice (until they encountered the Prison
Tree).
Why
would someone generate a desert vortex—and who planted the
mysterious boojum tree that creates such an effect? A Seri? Someone
else? Research the Seri, and if their beliefs don't seem, by modern
standards, strange enough to intrigue and, more importantly, frighten
readers, substitute an imaginary people and their beliefs for those
of the Seri. All is possible in fantastic fiction, after all, a genre
which includes horror. Don't forget to include a bizarre motivation
for the horrific horticulturalists.
Of course, the context in
which the trees are introduced also makes them frightening. A writer
must build toward his or her character's encounter of the mysterious
trees, and the author's account of the tree's nature and origin must
be fantastic and dark, if it's to generate fear.
Bentley Little is a master
of this approach. In particular such of his novels as The Resort
and The Influence are especially good examples of this
approach. Dan Simmons's Summer of Night is also evocative of
hostile landscapes, as is Stephen King's It and Dean Koontz's
The Taking. Other masters of this technique include Nathaniel
Hawthorne ("Young Goodman Brown") and Edgar Allan Poe ("TheFall of the House of Usher")
3. Authors can focus on
the disconcerting, possibly sinister, details of an everyday place.
An effective technique is to search an image browser using a phrase
such as “eerie photos of landscapes.” Conducting such a search,
using this same phrase, resulted in these (selected) images. (As my
search term suggest, I restricted my search to scenes of actual,
existing exterior places—as far as I can determine.) In considering
your own gallery, ask yourself what characteristics make the
photographs seem eerie. Think about both the literal (physical) and
the psychological aspects of the environment.
This photograph shows
dense foliage. The trees, bushes, and other forms of plant life are
clothed, as it were, in thick growths of leaves that make the eye
wander. One's gaze is easily lost in the abundance of detail. The
tufts, clusters, and clumps of vegetation among the shadowy “hollows”
between the leafy trees lead the eye in many directions and, at the
same time, nowhere. We are genetically hard-wired to seek patterns in
everything, but this mass of flora exhibits no discernible form or
structure; it is a senseless tangle, a meaningless maze, offering no
clue as to its location or context. However, our minds are reluctant
to accept this symbol of meaninglessness; we are apt to stare,
demanding that some meaning assert itself, even if we must invent
such meaning ourselves, imagining faces or forms that exist only in
our own minds, seeing her a visage, there a figure. Therein lies the
possibility for terror: the abundance of foliage is a mirror of the
soul, as we project upon it our own tortured fantasies; committing
the pathetic fallacy, we envision a menacing place, a hell, of our
own design. Denied orientation, we become confused and distraught;
when meaning isn't forthcoming, we become anxious and unsettled.
At first, this slight,
tree-lined berm may appear pleasantly bucolic, but this sense of
sylvan beauty dissipates under closer inspection. What, we may
wonder, lies buried under the extended mound? A monstrous worm, a
serpent worthy of Ragnarok, a dragon? The trees, especially those in
the foreground, are barren, and their sharp-pointed branches are
stubby, as if they've been snapped off—but by what? Even more
eerily, the row of trees on either side of the berm stand like
sentinels, appearing to direct our steps, to channel us, suggesting
that we take this elevated pathway to a point unknown. Are we the
human equivalents of cattle being directed, along an arboreal chute,
to the slaughter? How might these various perceptions—a grave for a
snakelike monster, snapped-off branches, sentinel-like trees, a
channeling landscape—add up to? What single scenario could unify
and explain them? When we believe—or even feel—we have lost our
autonomy, we experience panic.
A dark and foggy wood
stimulates the imagination by depriving us of the light which is
necessary for vision. In fog, as in darkness, our visibility is
limited. We cannot see clearly or, sometimes, at all. Effectively
blind, we can no longer be confident of our surroundings or of what
threat to us may lurk ahead (or, for that matter, to either side or
behind us). Dense clusters of branches and foliage also impedes
vision. A remote location cuts us off from the aid of others. This
photograph uses darkness, fog and the obstruction of abundant tree
growth to obscure our vision, a remote site to isolate us, but it
also seems to mock us. In a place devoid of human contact, we see a
bench among clumps of grass, a bench green with lichen, moss, or
algae, an artifact of human technology being overcome by nature.
Shall this be our own fate? Cut off and alone, shall we succumb to
our fate, our corpses taken over by invading plants? Perhaps we know
why we began our journey, before we became lost, near nightfall, but
where are we now? It is difficult, perhaps impossible, to say,
but, certainly, we are alone. Deprivation of sight and the company of
others, we feel vulnerable and helpless.
Sometimes, in demonstrating how to brainstorm about an essay topic, selecting horror movies, I ask students to name the titles of as many such movies as spring to mind (seldom a difficult feat for them, as the genre remains quite popular among young adults). Then, I ask them to identify the monster, or threat--the antagonist, to use the proper terminology--that appears in each of the films they have named. Again, this is usually a quick and easy task. Finally, I ask them to group the films’ adversaries into one of three possible categories: natural, paranormal, or supernatural. This is where the fun begins.
It’s a simple enough matter, usually, to identify the threats which fall under the “natural” label, especially after I supply my students with the scientific definition of “nature”: everything that exists as either matter or energy (which are, of course, the same thing, in different forms--in other words, the universe itself. The supernatural is anything which falls outside, or is beyond, the universe: God, angels, demons, and the like, if they exist. Mad scientists, mutant cannibals (and just plain cannibals), serial killers, and such are examples of natural threats. So far, so simple.
What about borderline creatures, though? Are vampires, werewolves, and zombies, for example, natural or supernatural? And what about Freddy Krueger? In fact, what does the word “paranormal” mean, anyway? If the universe is nature and anything outside or beyond the universe is supernatural, where does the paranormal fit into the scheme of things?
According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, the word “paranormal,” formed of the prefix “para,” meaning alongside, and “normal,” meaning “conforming to common standards, usual,” was coined in 1920. The American Heritage Dictionary defines “paranormal” to mean “beyond the range of normal experience or scientific explanation.” In other words, the paranormal is not supernatural--it is not outside or beyond the universe; it is natural, but, at the present, at least, inexplicable, which is to say that science cannot yet explain its nature. The same dictionary offers, as examples of paranormal phenomena, telepathy and “a medium’s paranormal powers.”
Wikipedia offers a few other examples of such phenomena or of paranormal sciences, including the percentages of the American population which, according to a Gallup poll, believes in each phenomenon, shown here in parentheses: psychic or spiritual healing (54), extrasensory perception (ESP) (50), ghosts (42), demons (41), extraterrestrials (33), clairvoyance and prophecy (32), communication with the dead (28), astrology (28), witchcraft (26), reincarnation (25), and channeling (15); 36 percent believe in telepathy.
As can be seen from this list, which includes demons, ghosts, and witches along with psychics and extraterrestrials, there is a confusion as to which phenomena and which individuals belong to the paranormal and which belong to the supernatural categories. This confusion, I believe, results from the scientism of our age, which makes it fashionable for people who fancy themselves intelligent and educated to dismiss whatever cannot be explained scientifically or, if such phenomena cannot be entirely rejected, to classify them as as-yet inexplicable natural phenomena. That way, the existence of a supernatural realm need not be admitted or even entertained. Scientists tend to be materialists, believing that the real consists only of the twofold unity of matter and energy, not dualists who believe that there is both the material (matter and energy) and the spiritual, or supernatural. If so, everything that was once regarded as having been supernatural will be regarded (if it cannot be dismissed) as paranormal and, maybe, if and when it is explained by science, as natural. Indeed, Sigmund Freud sought to explain even God as but a natural--and in Freud’s opinion, an obsolete--phenomenon.
Meanwhile, among skeptics, there is an ongoing campaign to eliminate the paranormal by explaining them as products of ignorance, misunderstanding, or deceit. Ridicule is also a tactic that skeptics sometimes employ in this campaign. For example, The Skeptics’ Dictionarycontends that the perception of some “events” as being of a paranormal nature may be attributed to “ignorance or magical thinking.” The dictionary is equally suspicious of each individual phenomenon or “paranormal science” as well. Concerning psychics’ alleged ability to discern future events, for example, The Skeptic’s Dictionary quotes Jay Leno (“How come you never see a headline like 'Psychic Wins Lottery'?”), following with a number of similar observations:
Psychics don't rely on psychics to warn them of impending disasters. Psychics don't predict their own deaths or diseases. They go to the dentist like the rest of us. They're as surprised and disturbed as the rest of us when they have to call a plumber or an electrician to fix some defect at home. Their planes are delayed without their being able to anticipate the delays. If they want to know something about Abraham Lincoln, they go to the library; they don't try to talk to Abe's spirit. In short, psychics live by the known laws of nature except when they are playing the psychic game with people.
In An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult and Supernatural, James Randi, a magician who exercises a skeptical attitude toward all things alleged to be paranormal or supernatural, takes issue with the notion of such phenomena as well, often employing the same arguments and rhetorical strategies as The Skeptic’s Dictionary.
In short, the difference between the paranormal and the supernatural lies in whether one is a materialist, believing in only the existence of matter and energy, or a dualist, believing in the existence of both matter and energy and spirit. If one maintains a belief in the reality of the spiritual, he or she will classify such entities as angels, demons, ghosts, gods, vampires, and other threats of a spiritual nature as supernatural, rather than paranormal, phenomena. He or she may also include witches (because, although they are human, they are empowered by the devil, who is himself a supernatural entity) and other natural threats that are energized, so to speak, by a power that transcends nature and is, as such, outside or beyond the universe. Otherwise, one is likely to reject the supernatural as a category altogether, identifying every inexplicable phenomenon as paranormal, whether it is dark matter or a teenage werewolf. Indeed, some scientists dedicate at least part of their time to debunking allegedly paranormal phenomena, explaining what natural conditions or processes may explain them, as the author of The Serpent and the Rainbow explains the creation of zombies by voodoo priests.
Based upon my recent reading of Tzvetan Todorov's The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to the Fantastic, I add the following addendum to this essay.
According to Todorov:
The fantastic. . . lasts only as long as a certain hesitation [in deciding] whether or not what they [the reader and the protagonist] perceive derives from "reality" as it exists in the common opinion. . . . If he [the reader] decides that the laws of reality remain intact and permit an explanation of the phenomena described, we can say that the work belongs to the another genre [than the fantastic]: the uncanny. If, on the contrary, he decides that new laws of nature must be entertained to account for the phenomena, we enter the genre of the marvelous (The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre, 41).
Todorov further differentiates these two categories by characterizing the uncanny as “the supernatural explained” and the marvelous as “the supernatural accepted” (41-42).
Interestingly, the prejudice against even the possibility of the supernatural’s existence which is implicit in the designation of natural versus paranormal phenomena, which excludes any consideration of the supernatural, suggests that there are no marvelous phenomena; instead, there can be only the uncanny. Consequently, for those who subscribe to this view, the fantastic itself no longer exists in this scheme, for the fantastic depends, as Todorov points out, upon the tension of indecision concerning to which category an incident belongs, the natural or the supernatural. The paranormal is understood, by those who posit it, in lieu of the supernatural, as the natural as yet unexplained.
And now, back to a fate worse than death: grading students’ papers.
Anyone who becomes an aficionado of anything tends, eventually, to develop criteria for elements or features of the person, place, or thing of whom or which he or she has become enamored. Horror fiction--admittedly not everyone’s cuppa blood--is no different (okay, maybe it’s a little different): it, too, appeals to different fans, each for reasons of his or her own. Of course, in general, book reviews, the flyleaves of novels, and movie trailers suggest what many, maybe even most, readers of a particular type of fiction enjoy, but, right here, right now, I’m talking more specifically--one might say, even more eccentrically. In other words, I’m talking what I happen to like, without assuming (assuming makes an “ass” of “u” and “me”) that you also like the same. It’s entirely possible that you will; on the other hand, it’s entirely likely that you won’t.
Anyway, this is what I happen to like in horror fiction:
Small-town settings in which I get to know the townspeople, both the good, the bad, and the ugly. For this reason alone, I’m a sucker for most of Stephen King’s novels. Most of them, from 'Salem's Lot to Under the Dome, are set in small towns that are peopled by the good, the bad, and the ugly. Part of the appeal here, granted, is the sense of community that such settings entail.
Isolated settings, such as caves, desert wastelands, islands, mountaintops, space, swamps, where characters are cut off from civilization and culture and must survive and thrive or die on their own, without assistance, by their wits and other personal resources. Many are the examples of such novels and screenplays, but Alien, The Shining, The Descent, Desperation, and The Island of Dr. Moreau, are some of the ones that come readily to mind.
Total institutions as settings. Camps, hospitals, military installations, nursing homes, prisons, resorts, spaceships, and other worlds unto themselves are examples of such settings, and Sleepaway Camp, Coma, The Green Mile, and Aliens are some of the novels or films that take place in such settings.
Anecdotal scenes--in other words, short scenes that showcase a character--usually, an unusual, even eccentric, character. Both Dean Koontz and the dynamic duo, Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child, excel at this, so I keep reading their series (although Koontz’s canine companions frequently--indeed, almost always--annoy, as does his relentless optimism).
Atmosphere, mood, and tone. Here, King is king, but so is Bentley Little. In the use of description to terrorize and horrify, both are masters of the craft.
A bit of erotica (okay, okay, sex--are you satisfied?), often of the unusual variety. Sex sells, and, yes, sex whets my reader’s appetite. Bentley Little is the go-to guy for this spicy ingredient, although Koontz has done a bit of seasoning with this spice, too, in such novels as Lightning and Demon Seed (and, some say, Hung).
Believable characters. Stephen King, Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child, and Dan Simmons are great at creating characters that stick to readers’ ribs.
Innovation. Bram Stoker demonstrates it, especially in his short story “Dracula’s Guest,” as does H. P. Lovecraft, Edgar Allan Poe, Shirley Jackson, and a host of other, mostly classical, horror novelists and short story writers. For an example, check out my post on Stoker’s story, which is a real stoker, to be sure. Stephen King shows innovation, too, in ‘Salem’s Lot, The Shining, It, and other novels. One might even argue that Dean Koontz’s something-for-everyone, cross-genre writing is innovative; he seems to have been one of the first, if not the first, to pen such tales.
Technique. Check out Frank Peretti’s use of maps and his allusions to the senses in Monster; my post on this very topic is worth a look, if I do say so myself, which, of course, I do. Opening chapters that accomplish a multitude of narrative purposes (not usually all at once, but successively) are attractive, too, and Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child are as good as anyone, and better than many, at this art.
A connective universe--a mythos, if you will, such as both H. P. Lovecraft and Stephen King, and, to a lesser extent, Dean Koontz, Bentley Little, and even Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child have created through the use of recurring settings, characters, themes, and other elements of fiction.
A lack of pretentiousness. Dean Koontz has it, as do Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child, Bentley Little, and (to some extent, although he has become condescending and self-indulgent of late, Stephen King); unfortunately, both Dan Simmons and Robert McCammon have become too self-important in their later works, Simmons almost to the point of becoming unreadable. Come on, people, you’re writing about monsters--you should be humble.
Longevity. Writers who have been around for a while usually get better, Stephen King, Dan Simmons, and Robert McCammon excepted.
Pacing. Neither too fast nor too slow. Dean Koontz is good, maybe the best, here, of contemporary horror writers.