Today,
we know that gigantism is caused by the excessive production of the
growth hormone somatotropin during puberty, prior to the fusion of the epiphyseal
growth plate. Gigantism may also be influenced by the
hormone insulin-like growth factor-I, or somatomedic-C. Genetic
mutations account for about half the cases of gigantism; various
genetic disorders are also associated with the condition.
In
pre-scientific literature, giants are depicted as much stronger than
ordinary men and women and, the “gentle giant” notwithstanding,
are often represented as hostile or cruel.
Goliath,
the giant Philistine defeated by David, was 6'9” according to the
Dead Sea Scrolls, but he was 9'9” according to the Masoretic
Text, which is the authoritative source of the Old Testament.
Alleged skull of a member of the Biblical Nephilim
Other Biblical giants include the Nephilim, most commonly thought to
have been the offspring of demons and mortal women, which, of late,
have encouraged several hoaxes pertaining to the alleged discoveries
of their skeletal remains.
Children of Uranus and Gaia, the Cyclopes
were mythical giants, although their height is unrecorded. The
best-known Cyclops is the cannibalistic Polyphemus, who consumes four
of Odysseus's men. Norse mythology is replete with giants, including
Fafner and Fasolt, who seized the goddess Freyja.
One
reason that giants frighten is that their size reminds us of our own
relative insignificance and vulnerability. Effortlessly, giants could
squash us like so many bugs. We would be totally at their mercy, and,
if they lack mercy, if they are hostile and cruel, as they are often
depicted, especially in horror fiction, then we are clearly at risk
of being injured or killed—and possibly even eaten!
Another
reason that giants frighten is that, by virtue of their vastly
increased size, whatever special or unique abilities they have are
also proportionately increased. If a hornet measures about 1.8 inch
long, or 45 millimeters, and its stinger is normally 0.24-inch, or
six millimeters, long, then a 10-foot-long (3.05-meter) hornet would
have a stinger about one foot, three inches (0.4-meter) long!
Some
horror movies depict threats from giant animals, including insects.
Among such fare are the giant ants of Them! (1954);
the giant wasps of The Food of the Gods (1973);
which, for good measure, also features giant rats; the giant spiders
of Ice Spiders (2007) and
Arachnid (2001); the
giant mosquitoes of Mosquito
(1995); the praying mantis of The Deadly Mantis (1957);
and others.
Giant
reptiles appear in several horror movies, including Alligator
(1980); Freshwater (2016); Anaconda
(1997); Boa vs. Python (2004),
Crocodile (2000);
Curse of the Komodo
(2004); Mega Snake
(2007); Reptilicus
(1961); The Giant Gila Monster (1959);
and others.
Another
popular giant menace is the ape: the ape of Ape
(1976); the gorilla of King Kong
(1933); and the gorilla of The Mighty Gorga (1969); the gorilla of Rampage
(2018); and others.
Worms,
fish, crustaceans, and marine mammals are featured in quite a few
horror films: Attack of the Crab Monsters
(1957); Attack of the Giant Leeches
(1959); the snakehead fish of Frankenfish (2004);
the octopus of It Came from Beneath the Sea
(1955); and others.
Various
dinosaurs, another favorite giant monster, appear in Attack
of the Sabretooth (2005); The
Beast from 20,000 Fathoms
(1953); The Beast of Hollow Mountain (1953),
Carnosaur (1993);
Dinoshark (2010); King
Dinosaur (1955); The
Last Dinosaur (1977); Legend
of Dinosaurs & Monster Birds
(1977); Mega Shark Versus Crocosaurus
(2010); Planet of Dinosaurs
(1977); and others.
Only
a few science fiction horror films feature giant humans, among them The
Amazing Colossal Man (1957), War
of the Colossal Beast (1958),
Attack of the 50-Foot Woman (1958);
The Cyclops (1957);
and The War of the Gargantuas
(1966) among them.
In
The Annotated Poe, the
observation is made that Edgar Allan Poe's work has suggested
storytelling techniques that filmmakers have adopted in dramatizing
their scripts:
.
. . his influence in the history
of cinema has been profound. He has since the early days of
motion pictures provided filmmakers with subjects, while influencing
the development of cinematic theory and technique (21).
For
example, Poe “anticipates the technique of cinematic montage,
in which brief shots are joined together to form a sequence that
compresses space, time, and information” in order to accelerate
“the action of the story, propelling readers towards its climax”
(43).
In
addition, Poe pioneered the narrative equivalent of alternating
close-up shots, distance shots, and extreme close-ups combined with
sound effects:
Poe
depicts Metzengerstein
in close-up (the “agony of his countenance'”, pulls back to show
him from a distance (“the convulsive struggling of his frame”),
and then supplies an extreme close-up (“his lacerated lips, which
were bitten through and through”). The rapid shifting of the images
quickens the narrative pace, which the ensuing cacophony of sound—the
shriek of Metzengerstein, the clatter of hooves, the roar of the
flames, and the shriek of the wind—further intensifies, thus
providing a running start for the horse's final bound up the stairs”
(34).
There's
no reason that the cinema shouldn't return the favor, as short story
writers and novelists adopt some of the camera
angles that directors and cameramen (and women) have found most
effective in filming horror movies.
In
doing so, the writer simply adopts the strategy of using description
to depict in words what the camera would show in images. In writing,
the writer is also the director and the cameraman (or woman); the
writer, therefore, calls the shots.
Here
are a few examples. (In the descriptions, specific references to
characters and situations have been deliberately eliminated in the
interests of describing more generic scenes. The video clips are more
specific, suggesting how particular writers, actors, directors, and
other filmmaking crew members have depicted such situations.)
The
extreme closeup is called for when “specific facial
expressions” indicate that action “that might scare . . . a
character” is about to occur or “has happened.”
Here's
the same scene, from Stanley Kubrick's The Shining (1980),
captured in the “camera” of descriptive writing:
Behind
him, above the immense fireplace and its burning log, a mural of
stylized girls in triangular skirts adorns the wall. To the left, Art
Deco windows are set in the wall, beneath a mounted moose head; a
table; chairs; twin candles in matching wall sconces. But decorative
features are indistinct, pale, ghostly images, suggestions, more than
realities. One's gaze is drawn to and fixated upon him.
His high forehead, his winged eyebrows, his staring eyes, his parted
lips command absolute attention, allegiance, devotion, as does his
stance, exuding confidence and power. As I approach, his features
remain the same; he does not blink, does not stir, does not change.
Nearer still, and his eyes, his gaze, without altering, expresses, in
its stillness and intensity, in its indomitable and unchanging will,
in its immutable and insistent being,
a demonic essence, at once both terrifying and mesmerizing,
inescapable and compelling.
A
point-of-view shotcaptures a
character's own visual experience, showing what he or she would see
in a particular situation, letting the reader view the scene as
character sees the action.
The
opening scene of John Carpenter's Halloween (1978):
Movement,
a march, a cadence measured and purposeful, past a jack-o-lantern
flickering from the fire inside; past dark foliage shapes; past the
shadows of leaves upon a wall white in the darkness, to a scene
framed by a window: inside a teens locked in an embrace kiss,
frantic, until they hear a sound; they break, listening. Then, they
run upstairs, excited. Movement, march, cadence, in reverse, back
past the leaf-shadows, the dark foliage shapes, the fiery carved
pumpkin, to the front yard. Up. The second-story window is
illuminated, then dark. Around, through the darkness, to the door
through the windows of which shows the kitchen. Enter. Light. Stove.
Sink. Open a drawer, remove a knife, huge and sharp of edge and
point. Dining room: table, candles, chairs, sideboard, shadow of a
chandelier upon a wall. Hallway. Living room: television, rocking
chair, sofa, pole lamp. A staircase, leading up. The teenage boy,
walking downstairs, exits the front door, closing it behind him. Up
the stairs, past a painting, framed and hanging on the wall, into the
darkness. Cast-off clothing on the floor: jacket, bra, panties. The
corner of a chair. Through a doorway, she sits, naked, the teenage
girl, running a brush through her hair. Behind her, the bedding is in
disarray, disheveled with the remnants of her lust. She brushes her
hair. Turns. Screams, covering her breasts with her hands, modest
now. The stabbing of the knife. Her fall, a collision with a dresser
and the floor. Down the stairs, through the darkness. Ceiling lights,
the foyer's hardwood floor, the door, opening upon deeper darkness
and car lights. A man and a woman, hurry through the night, toward
the house, their parked car abandoned. The mask is pulled away, and
the killer, bloody knife in hand, their eight-year-old son, a clown,
is revealed, is born,
this Halloween.
The
over-the-shoulder shot
is used either to suggest that a character is conversing with another
character or that another character is following the character shown
in the shot. This camera angle focuses on a single character,
emphasizing him or her, but implies that one or more other
characters, although unseen, are also present. It can also set up a
shock; for example, “the character could turn around and look
possessed.”
Grace
Newman learns something about herself in this scene from The
Others (2001):
Seated
on the floor, her back to the door, covered in a heavy, white voile
veil and bundled in a matching dress, her young daughter, the
puppeteer, has gnarly, old hands; an aged face, half-hidden beneath
the ectoplasmic veil, attempts to deceive, but the pale, shocked
thirty-year-old redhead in the black dress is not deceived: she knows
this person, this thing,
is not her daughter.
The mother chokes the old crone, the impostor, the changeling; yanks
the veil from her; and sees—the child in the dress is
her daughter, after all. The child stares at her mother in disbelief,
in terror: the stranger, her mother, this mad woman who disowned her,
has tried to kill her!
The
establishing shot,
“usually shot at a distance” is 'a wide shot” that sets the
scene by showing the site of upcoming action. Such a shot may be
devoid of characters; if characters are present, they are merely
window dressing, part of the scene itself—unless and until the
“camera” (the description) zeroes in on them, picking them out
from the crowd.
Stanley
Kubrick's establishing shot is the sequence with which The
Shining
begins, as Jack Torrance drives to the Overlook Hotel:
A
dark blue lake, a green island in its midst, parallels a two-lane
mountain road meandering, a gray ribbon, or a snake, through a forest
thick with shaggy conifers, passing no other cars for miles and
miles. Wide, open land stretches away, before the mountains' jagged,
snow-covered peaks. The car looks like a toy, as it follows the
sweeping grandeur of the terrain. Up a slope, tight against a cliff
on the right, a sheer drop-off on the left shored up by a retaining
wall, the yellow VW rounds a curve, and the highway seems to open up,
wide. Finally, another car, a white limousine—stalled, it seems—is
seen; the VW swings past, leaving it behind. Ahead, a tunnel plunges
through the mountainside beneath the pines; for a few moments, the VW
disappears, then emerges, passes another stopped car, on the left
shoulder, continuing to pursue the highway between the towering cliff
on the right and the plummeting drop-off on the left. Passing another
car—the third in what seems forever—the yellow VW now travels
along a stretch of road cut into the steep slope of the mountainside
itself; gone, for the moment, are the cliffs; all is mountainside,
green with grass and stands, but no forests, of pines. In the
distance, craggy mountains loom. Another car, a canoe on top, passes,
and then, there is snow on the mountains and the roadside. At the
base of a mountain decorated with fields of snow, a hotel sits,
immense in itself, but tiny compared to the mountain rearing behind
it, into the clear, dark-blue sky. Finally, the yellow VW has
arrived.
The
wide shot
is similar to the establishing shot, but the wide shot focuses on the
characters and can lend a sense of depth to the action' all the
characters and objects are in focus and perspective, so this shot
equalizes rather than highlights characters, objects, and actions.
Another
clip from Halloween
includes a wide shot:
A
young woman in blue denim bell-bottom jeans and a light-blue blouse,
hands in pockets, mounts the steps leading from a suburban lawn to a
broad porch. At the entrance flanked by windows, she rings the
doorbell, leans left to peer into the window, turns, and leaves, back
across the porch and down the steps. She crosses the front yard,
passes the porch railing and the fiery jack-o-lantern seated there,
walks down the side of the house, with her shadow on the wall, and is
lost to the darkness. She emerges from the night, approaching the
back door, which is open. She hesitates. Steps into the kitchen,
closing the door behind her. Passing through dark rooms, she climbs
the stairs to the second floor, and is swallowed by the darkness. To
her left, at the top of the stairs, light shines around and beneath a
closed door. She approaches, down the hallway. Illuminated by ambient
light, her face is a picture of curiosity. She opens the door, and
her eyes widen. Laid out in the bed, her arms extended so that her
corpse forms a cross, a woman lies, dead; a headstone propped behind
her, against the head of the bed, reads, “Judith Myers.” A
pumpkin, lit by candlelight, grins on the night table beside her.
Gasping, the young woman covers her mouth in her hands and backs into
the wall behind her. She turns, and the body of a young man,
suspended upside-down, swings through the doorway beside her, back
and forth, back and forth, back and forth. She retreats, and a
cabinet door opens to reveal a blonde woman her own age, blouse open,
breasts revealed, staring at nothing. She flees into the hallway,
crying, distraught and terrified, leaning against another room's
doorjamb. A white mask appears in the darkness of the room beside
her. The masked man emerges, and a butcher's knife plunges, ripping
the sleeve of her blouse. She turns, falls over the staircase
railing, onto the steps, and slides down the stairs. The masked man
follows, standing at the head of the stairs for a moment, framed by
the light of the room behind him, where the two female corpses are
posed and the male body is rigged. Not dead, the young woman rises
and steps forth, into the darkness.
The
high-angleshot
looks down on the action, making characters, objects, and settings
seem small and insignificant, thus heightening their vulnerability.
Breaking
Bad: Crawl Space
(2011), directed by Scott Winant, alternates between high-angle shots
and low-angle shots. The low-angle shots show a man in a crawlspace;
these shots alternate with high-angle shots showing a blonde woman in
the house, looking down at him.
A
man on his hands and knees tears frantically at a sheet of plastic.
He turns over, clutching bundles of cash. A blonde woman peers down
at him. He demands to know something. Taken aback, the woman shakes
her head. Lying on his back in the crawlspace, he kicks his heels,
dislodging dirt, yelling up, through the opening in the floor that
connects the crawlspace to the house. She gasps. In the crawlspace,
he looks desperate. She closes her eyes, makes a response. He stares
up at her, disbelief on his face, as asks more questions. Frightened,
she explains. He puts his hands atop his head. She apologizes. He
rants, clenching his fists. She kneels, looking down upon him,
concerned. He rolls onto his left side, hands covering is face,
whimpering. He rolls back onto his back, weeping and sobbing. She
looks down, pity on her face, and makes a comment. His wailing turns
to laughter, and her rolls onto his left shoulder, then onto his back
again. Looking both concerned and frightened, the blonde woman backs
away from the opening to the crawlspace, into the hallway. Elsewhere,
a woman in dim light paces back and forth as she talks on a cell
phone. The blonde walks along a hallway, past the door to a kitchen,
and picks up the receiver to a telephone on a kitchen counter
accessible from the hallway. She starts to talk, walking away, down
the hallway. In the crawlspace, among the bundled cash, the man
continues to laugh, as the view of him, framed by the opening to the
crawlspace, becomes more and more distant, suggesting he is
insignificant, alone, vulnerable, and trapped.
A
shot similar to the high-angle shot, the bird's-eye
view shot
also looks down upon a character. Thanks to the bird's eye view shot,
which looks 'straight down . . . usually [at] a setting” or a
“place,” a character appears “short and squashed,” which
makes this shot “effective in a
horror movie” in which a character's movement is being tracked or
as an establishing shot.
The
low-angle shot is
the opposite of the high-angle shot, looking up to another character,
object, or aspect of the setting. This shot can suggest a character's
lack of power or authority and can indicate confusion and
“disorientation.”
The low-angle shots showing the
man in the crawlspace alternate with the high-angle shots showing the
woman in the house, looking down at him.
A
shot similar to the low-angle shot, the worm's
eye view shot
also looks down upon a character. In the worm's eye view shot, the
angle is even lower than that found in the low-angle shot. The angle
in the worm's eye view shot is so low that it could be a worm's
vision on things. This angle makes “things look tall and mighty”
and can show a character “walking around a house” or some other
location, without giving away the character's identity.
The
canted-angle shot
sets a character at a diagonal, tilting him or her, and suggests
“imbalance and instability,” especially if it is combined with a
point of vie shot. The canted angle shot implies that “something
strange is about to happen.”
This
example of the canted-angle shot, from Cindy Kaye's Dutch Angle:
The Movie (2016) could be
described this way:
A
closed door at the end of a hallway, like the door frame, the vase of
flowers at the in the hallway, near the door, the walls, and the
corridor itself, tilt to the left. Another door opens, and a boy
leans out. He looks at the door at the end of the hall. He starts
toward it. The lights go out. The lights come back on. They blink,
off and on, off and on. The boy turns left at the end of the hall.
The lights go out. When they come on again, he is walking down the
stairs to the first floor. The lights continue to blink off and on.
At the bottom of the stairs, he turns left. The lights continue to
blink off and on. Through an open doorway, the boy is seen lying
prone, on the floor of a chamber that appears to be a dining room: it
is furnished with a table and chairs and a cabinet full of dishes,
but, there is also a made-up bed in the room. The lights go out; they
do not come on again.
By
deciding on the elements you want to include in a situation and the
envisioning it as a scene, you can write descriptions that have
immediacy, drama, unity, and coherence. At the same time, such
descriptions will appeal to readers' senses, heightening
verisimilitude, and facilitating the identification between the
reader and the characters involved in such situations. Such
descriptions guarantee that the scene you describe will have
characters in conflict, thematic significance, narrative purpose, and
interconnection with previous and subsequent scenes as well as a
cause-and-effect relationship with other scenes in the plot.
It
helps, when writing short stories or novels, to plot them
meticulously, even to the storyboarding level that Alfred Hitchcock
used in planning his movies' plots and the way action would be
presented and appear on the screen. His care about details of
audiovisual storytelling are one of the reasons for his great
success and the respect he received and continues to receive. Best of
all, the techniques he used, one of which was calling the shots well
before filming a movie, are available to all storytellers and to
storytellers of all kinds.
In
every horror movie, there is, of course, a protagonist and an
antagonist. For convenience, I'm going to refer to them as the
monster and the hero. Of course, the monster, both human and
non-human, and the “hero” can just as easily be a girl or a woman
as a boy or a man.
For
there to be a story, there has to be conflict, and the major and most
important type of conflict, that between the monster and the hero,
results from their encounter. Therefore, they must come together,
usually in the first part of the story. Writers have come up with a
variety of ways for the monster and the hero to meet, if not greet,
one another. These methods of encounter, in turn, help to establish
various narrative formulas.
Some
of these formulas we might call The Return, The Invasion, The
Trespass, The Act of Vengeance, and The Fish Out of Water. Here are
the breakdowns of these plots and a few examples of each.
The
Return
Beginning
A
monster (an ancient evil) awakens or returns.
Middle
The
monster becomes active again.
End
By
learning the monster's origin or nature, the hero eliminates or
neutralizes the monster.
Examples:
Summer of Night, It
The
Invasion
Beginning
A monster moves into a community
foreign to itself.
Middle
The monster becomes active in
its new surroundings, behaving as it did in its original habitat.
End
By
learning the monster's origin or nature, the hero eliminates or
neutralizes the monster.
Examples:
Dracula,
'Salem's Lot
The
Trespass
Beginning
Trespassers disturb or threaten
a monster's habitat.
Middle
The monster defends its turf.
End
The trespassers capture or kill
the monster, escape from the monster, or are killed by the monster.
Examples: The Descent,
Poltergeist, King Kong, The Thing
The Act of Vengeance
Beginning
The monster or his or her loved
one is wronged.
Middle
The monster seeks to avenge him-
or herself or a loved one.
End
The monster is imprisoned,
killed, or otherwise neutralized or escapes.
Examples: The Abominable Dr.
Phibes, I Know What You Did Last Summer, A Nightmare on
Elm Street
The
Fish Out of Water
Beginning
The
hero, relocated to a strange new environment, usually that of the
monster, is out of his or her depth.
Middle
The
monster, at home in the environment, maintains the upper hand against
the hero.
End
The
hero kills the monster or escapes or is killed by the monster.
Examples:
Open Water,
Backcountry,
Jaws.
Note:
A future post may present other horror story plot formulas.
A prequel to the series An Adventure of the Old West, this action-packed
short story introduces Bane Messenger, a Union veteran of the Civil
War, who teams with former Confederate commander, Colonel Jake Miller,
to become a bounty hunter. On the trail of a vicious outlaw wanted for
kidnapping and murder during a series of robberies, Bane hones his
tracking, reconnaissance, and fighting skills. His final showdown with
his deadly quarry will show him just how good he is with a gun and
launch his career as a man who makes his living bringing killers to
justice, dead or alive.
I
have never heard an even approximately adequate explanation of the
horror at Martin's Beach. Despite the large number of witnesses, no
two accounts agree; and the testimony taken by local authorities
contains the most amazing discrepancies.
Perhaps this haziness is
natural in view of the unheard-of character of the horror itself, the
almost paralytic terror of all who saw it, and the efforts made by
the fashionable Wavecrest Inn to hush it up after the publicity
created by Prof. Ahon's article "Are Hypnotic Powers Confined to
Recognized Humanity?" Against all these obstacles I
am striving to present a coherent version; for I beheld the hideous
occurrence, and believe it should be known in view of the appalling
possibilities it suggests. Martin's Beach is once more popular as a
watering-place, but I shudder when I think of it. Indeed, I cannot
look at the ocean at all now without shuddering. Fate is not always without a
sense of drama and climax, hence the terrible happening of August 8,
1922, swiftly followed a period of minor and agreeably wonder-fraught
excitement at Martin's Beach. On May 17 the crew of the fishing smack
Alma of Gloucester, under Capt. James P. Orne, killed, after a battle
of nearly forty hours, a marine monster whose size and aspect
produced the greatest possible stir in scientific circles and caused
certain Boston naturalists to take every precaution for its
taxidermic preservation. The object was some fifty
feet in length, of roughly cylindrical shape, and about ten feet in
diameter. It was unmistakably a gilled fish in its major
affiliations; but with certain curious modifications such as
rudimentary forelegs and six-toed feet in place of pectoral fins,
which prompted the widest speculation. Its extraordinary mouth, its
thick and scaly hide, and its single, deep-set eye were wonders
scarcely less remarkable than its colossal dimensions; and when the
naturalists pronounced it an infant organism, which could not have
been hatched more than a few days, public interest mounted to
extraordinary heights. Capt. Orne, with typical
Yankee shrewdness, obtained a vessel large enough to hold the object
in its hull, and arranged for the exhibition of his prize. With
judicious carpentry he prepared what amounted to an excellent marine
museum, and, sailing south to the wealthy resort district of Martin's
Beach, anchored at the hotel wharf and reaped a harvest of admission
fees. The intrinsic marvelousness
of the object, and the importance which it clearly bore in the minds
of many scientific visitors from near and far, combined to make it
the season's sensation. That it was absolutely unique—unique to a
scientifically revolutionary degree—was well understood. The
naturalists had shown plainly that it radically differed from the
similarly immense fish caught off the Florida coast; that, while it
was obviously an inhabitant of almost incredible depths, perhaps
thousands of feet, its brain and principal organs indicated a
development startlingly vast, and out of all proportion to anything
hitherto associated with the fish tribe. On the morning of July 20 the
sensation was increased by the loss of the vessel and its strange
treasure. In the storm of the preceding night it had broken from its
moorings and vanished forever from the sight of man, carrying with it
the guard who had slept aboard despite the threatening weather. Capt.
Orne, backed by extensive scientific interests and aided by large
numbers of fishing boats from Gloucester, made a thorough and
exhaustive searching cruise, but with no result other than the
prompting of interest and conversation. By August 7 hope was
abandoned, and Capt. Orne had returned to the Wavecrest Inn to wind
up his business affairs at Martin's Beach and confer with certain of
the scientific men who remained there. The horror came on August 8.
It was in the twilight, when
grey sea-birds hovered low near the shore and a rising moon began to
make a glittering path across the waters. The scene is important to
remember, for every impression counts. On the beach were several
strollers and a few late bathers; stragglers from the distant cottage
colony that rose modestly on a green hill to the north, or from the
adjacent cliff-perched Inn whose imposing towers proclaimed its
allegiance to wealth and grandeur. Well within viewing distance
was another set of spectators, the loungers on the Inn's high-ceiled
and lantern-lighted veranda, who appeared to be enjoying the dance
music from the sumptuous ballroom inside. These spectators, who
included Capt. Orne and his group of scientific confreres, joined the
beach group before the horror progressed far; as did many more from
the Inn. Certainly there was no lack of witnesses, confused though
their stories be with fear and doubt of what they saw. There is no exact record of
the time the thing began, although a majority say that the fairly
round moon was "about a foot" above the low-lying vapors of
the horizon. They mention the moon because what they saw seemed
subtly connected with it—a sort of stealthy, deliberate, menacing
ripple which rolled in from the far skyline along the shimmering lane
of reflected moonbeams, yet which seemed to subside before it reached
the shore. Many did not notice this
ripple until reminded by later events; but it seems to have been very
marked, differing in height and motion from the normal waves around
it. Some called it cunning and calculating. And as it died away
craftily by the black reefs afar out, there suddenly came belching up
out of the glitter-streaked brine a cry of death; a scream of anguish
and despair that moved pity even while it mocked it. First to respond to the cry
were the two life guards then on duty; sturdy fellows in white
bathing attire, with their calling proclaimed in large red letters
across their chests. Accustomed as they were to rescue work, and to
the screams of the drowning, they could find nothing familiar in the
unearthly ululation; yet with a trained sense of duty they ignored
the strangeness and proceeded to follow their usual course. Hastily seizing an
air-cushion, which with its attached coil of rope lay always at hand,
one of them ran swiftly along the shore to the scene of the gathering
crowd; whence, after whirling it about to gain momentum, he flung the
hollow disc far out in the direction from which the sound had come.
As the cushion disappeared in the waves, the crowd curiously awaited
a sight of the hapless being whose distress had been so great; eager
to see the rescue made by the massive rope. But that rescue was soon
acknowledged to be no swift and easy matter; for, pull as they might
on the rope, the two muscular guards could not move the object at the
other end. Instead, they found that object pulling with equal or even
greater force in the very opposite direction, till in a few seconds
they were dragged off their feet and into the water by the strange
power which had seized on the proffered life-preserver. One of them, recovering
himself, called immediately for help from the crowd on the shore, to
whom he flung the remaining coil of rope; and in a moment the guards
were seconded by all the hardier men, among whom Capt. Orne was
foremost. More than a dozen strong hands were now tugging desperately
at the stout line, yet wholly without avail. Hard as they tugged, the
strange force at the other end tugged harder; and since neither side
relaxed for an instant, the rope became rigid as steel with the
enormous strain. The struggling participants, as well as the
spectators, were by this time consumed with curiosity as to the
nature of the force in the sea. The idea of a drowning man had long
been dismissed; and hints of whales, submarines, monsters, and demons
now passed freely around. Where humanity had first led the rescuers,
wonder kept them at their task; and they hauled with a grim
determination to uncover the mystery. It being decided at last that
a whale must have swallowed the air-cushion, Capt. Orne, as a natural
leader, shouted to those on shore that a boat must be obtained in
order to approach, harpoon, and land the unseen leviathan. Several
men at once prepared to scatter in quest of a suitable craft, while
others came to supplant the captain at the straining rope, since his
place was logically with whatever boat party might be formed. His own
idea of the situation was very broad, and by no means limited to
whales, since he had to do with a monster so much stranger. He
wondered what might be the acts and manifestations of an adult of the
species of which the fifty-foot creature had been the merest infant. And now there developed with
appalling suddenness the crucial fact which changed the entire scene
from one of wonder to one of horror, and dazed with fright the
assembled band of toilers and onlookers. Capt. Orne, turning to leave
his post at the rope, found his hands held in their place with
unaccountable strength; and in a moment he realized that he was
unable to let go of the rope. His plight was instantly divined, and
as each companion tested his own situation the same condition was
encountered. The fact could not be denied—every struggler was
irresistibly held in some mysterious bondage to the hempen line which
was slowly, hideously, and relentlessly pulling them out to sea. Speechless horror ensued; a
horror in which the spectators were petrified to utter inaction and
mental chaos. Their complete demoralization is reflected in the
conflicting accounts they give, and the sheepish excuses they offer
for their seemingly callous inertia. I was one of them, and know. Even the strugglers, after a
few frantic screams and futile groans, succumbed to the paralyzing
influence and kept silent and fatalistic in the face of unknown
powers. There they stood in the pallid moonlight, blindly pulling
against a spectral doom and swaying monotonously backward and forward
as the water rose first to their knees, then to their hips. The moon
went partly under a cloud, and in the half-light the line of swaying
men resembled some sinister and gigantic centipede, writhing in the
clutch of a terrible creeping death. Harder and harder grew the
rope, as the tug in both directions increased, and the strands
swelled with the undisturbed soaking of the rising waves. Slowly the
tide advanced, till the sands so lately peopled by laughing children
and whispering lovers were now swallowed by the inexorable flow. The
herd of panic-stricken watchers surged blindly backward as the water
crept above their feet, while the frightful line of strugglers swayed
hideously on, half submerged, and now at a substantial distance from
their audience. Silence was complete. The crowd, having gained a
huddling-place beyond reach of the tide, stared in mute fascination;
without offering a word of advice or encouragement, or attempting any
kind of assistance. There was in the air a nightmare fear of
impending evils such as the world had never before known. Minutes seemed lengthened
into hours, and still that human snake of swaying torsos was seen
above the fast rising tide. Rhythmically it undulated; slowly,
horribly, with the seal of doom upon it. Thicker clouds now passed
over the ascending moon, and the glittering path on the waters faded
nearly out. Very dimly writhed the
serpentine line of nodding heads, with now and then the livid face of
a backward-glancing victim gleaming pale in the darkness. Faster and
faster gathered the clouds, till at length their angry rifts shot
down sharp tongues of febrile flame. Thunders rolled, softly at
first, yet soon increasing to a deafening, maddening intensity. Then
came a culminating crash—a shock whose reverberations seemed to
shake land and sea alike—and on its heels a cloudburst whose
drenching violence overpowered the darkened world as if the heavens
themselves had opened to pour forth a vindictive torrent. The spectators, instinctively
acting despite the absence of conscious and coherent thought, now
retreated up the cliff steps to the hotel veranda. Rumors had reached
the guests inside, so that the refugees found a state of terror
nearly equal to their own. I think a few frightened words were
uttered, but cannot be sure. Some, who were staying at the
Inn, retired in terror to their rooms; while others remained to watch
the fast sinking victims as the line of bobbing heads showed above
the mounting waves in the fitful lightning flashes. I recall thinking
of those heads, and the bulging eyes they must contain; eyes that
might well reflect all the fright, panic, and delirium of a malignant
universe—all the sorrow, sin, and misery, blasted hopes and
unfulfilled desires, fear, loathing and anguish of the ages since
time's beginning; eyes alight with all the soul-racking pain of
eternally blazing infernos. And as I gazed out beyond the
heads, my fancy conjured up still another eye; a single eye, equally
alight, yet with a purpose so revolting to my brain that the vision
soon passed. Held in the clutches of an unknown vise, the line of the
damned dragged on; their silent screams and unuttered prayers known
only to the demons of the black waves and the night-wind. There now burst from the
infuriate sky such a mad cataclysm of satanic sound that even the
former crash seemed dwarfed. Amidst a blinding glare of descending
fire the voice of heaven resounded with the blasphemies of hell, and
the mingled agony of all the lost reverberated in one apocalyptic,
planet-rending peal of Cyclopean din. It was the end of the storm,
for with uncanny suddenness the rain ceased and the moon once more
cast her pallid beams on a strangely quieted sea. There was no line of bobbing
heads now. The waters were calm and deserted, and broken only by the
fading ripples of what seemed to be a whirlpool far out in the path
of the moonlight whence the strange cry had first come. But as I
looked along that treacherous lane of silvery sheen, with fancy
fevered and senses overwrought, there trickled upon my ears from some
abysmal sunken waste the faint and sinister echoes of a laugh.
About two in the
morning I knew it was coming. The great black silences of night's
depth told me, and a monstrous cricket, chirping with a persistence
too hideous to be unmeaning, made it certain. It is to be at four
o'clock—at four in the dusk before dawn, just as he said it would
be. I had not fully believed it previously, because the prophecies of
vindictive madmen are seldom to be taken with seriousness. Besides, I
was not justly to be blamed for what had befallen him at four o'clock
on that other morning; that terrible morning whose memory will never
leave me. And when, at length, he had died and was buried in the
ancient cemetery just across the road from my east windows, I was
certain that his curse could not harm me. Had I not seen his lifeless
clay securely pinned down by huge shovelfuls of mold? Might I not
feel assured that his crumbling bones would be powerless to bring me
the doom at a day and an hour so precisely stated? Such, indeed, had
been my thoughts until this shocking night itself; this night of
incredible chaos, of shattered certainties, and of nameless portents.
I had retired
early, hoping fatuously to snatch a few hours of sleep despite the
prophecy which haunted me. Now that the time was so close at hand, I
found it harder and harder to dismiss the vague fears which had
always lain beneath my conscious thoughts. As the cooling sheets
soothed my fevered body, I could find nothing to soothe my still more
fevered mind; but lay tossing and uneasily awake, trying first one
position and then another in a desperate effort to banish with
slumber that one damnably insistent notion—that it is to occur
at four o'clock.
Was this frightful
unrest due to my surroundings; to the fateful locality in which I was
sojourning after so many years? Why, I now asked myself bitterly, had
I permitted circumstance to place me on this night of all nights, in
that well-remembered house and that well-remembered room whose east
windows overlook the lonely road and the ancient country cemetery
beyond? In my mind’s eye every detail of that unpretentious
necropolis rose before me—its white fence, its ghost-like granite
shafts, and the hovering auras of those on whom the worms fed.
Finally the force of the conception led my vision to depths more
remote and more forbidden, and I saw under the neglected grass the
silent shapes of the things from which the auras came - the calm
sleepers, the rotting things, the things which had twisted
frantically in their coffins before sleep came, and the peaceful
bones in every stage of disintegration from the complete and coherent
skeleton to the huddled handful of dust. Most of all I envied the
dust. Then new terror came as my fancy encountered his grave. Into
that sepulcher I dared not let my thought stray, and I should have
screamed had not something forestalled the malign power that pulled
my mental sight. That something was a sudden gust of wind, sprung
from nowhere amidst the calm night, which unfastened the shutter of
the nearest window, throwing it back with a shivery slam and
uncovering to my actual waking glance the antique cemetery itself,
brooding spectrally beneath an early morning moon.
I speak of this
gust as something merciful, yet know now that it was only transiently
and mockingly so. For no sooner had my eyes compassed the moonlight
scene than I became aware of a fresh omen, this time too unmistakable
to be classed as an empty phantasm, which arose from among the
gleaming tombs across the road. Having glanced with instinctive
apprehension toward the spot where he lay moldering—a
spot cut off from my gaze by the window-frame—I perceived with
trepidation the approach of an indescribable something which flowed
menacingly from that very direction; a vague, vaporous,
formless mass of grayish- white substance or spirit, dull and tenuous
as yet, but every moment increasing in awesome and cataclysmic
potentiality. Try as I might to dismiss it as a natural
meteorological phenomenon, its fearsomely portentous and deliberate
character grew upon me amidst new thrills of horror and apprehension;
so that I was scarcely unprepared for the definitely purposeful and
malevolent culmination which soon occurred. That culmination,
bringing with it a hideous symbolic foreshadowing of the end, was
equally simple and threatening. The vapor each moment thickened and
piled up, assuming at last a half tangible aspect; while the surface
toward me gradually became circular in outline, and markedly concave;
as it slowly ceased its advance and stood spectrally at the end of
the road. And as it stood there, faintly quivering in the damp night
air under that unwholesome moon, I saw that its aspect was that of
the pallid and gigantic dial of a distorted clock.
Hideous events now
followed in demoniac succession. There took shape in the lower
right-hand part of the vaporous dial a black and formidable creature,
shapeless and only half seen, yet having four prominent claws which
reached out greedily at me—claws redolent of noxious fatality in
their very contour and location; since they formed too plainly the
dreaded outlines, and filled too unmistakably the exact position, of
the numeral IV on the quivering dial of doom. Presently the
monstrosity stepped or wriggled out of the concave surface of the
dial, and began to approach me by some unexplained kind of
locomotion. The four talons, long, thin, and straight, were now seen
to be tipped by disgusting, thread-like tentacles, each with a vile
intelligence of its own, which groped about incessantly, slowly at
first, but gradually increasing in velocity until I was nearly driven
mad by the sheer dizziness of their motion. And as a crowning horror
I began to hear all the subtle and cryptic noises that pierced the
intensified night silence; a thousand-fold magnified, and in one
voice reminding me of the abhorred hour of four. In vain I tried to
pull up the coverlet to shut them out; in vain I tried to drown them
with my screams. I was mute and paralyzed, yet agonizingly aware of
every unnatural sight and sound in that devastating, moon-cursed
stillness. Once I managed to get my head beneath the covers—once
when the cricket's shrieking of that hideous phrase, four-o’clock,
seemed about to shatter my brain—but that only aggravated the
terror, making the roars of that detestable creature strike me like
the blows of a titanic sledgehammer.
And now, as I
withdrew my tortured head from its fruitless protection, I found
augmented diabolism to harass my eyes. Upon the newly painted wall of
my apartment, as if called forth by the tentacled monster from the
tomb, there danced mockingly before me a myriad company of beings,
black, grey, and white, such as only the fancy of the god-stricken
might visualize. Some were of infinitesimal smallness; others covered
vast areas. In minor details each had a grotesque and horrible
individuality, in general outlines they all conformed to the same
nightmare pattern despite their vastly varied size. Again I tried to
shut out the abnormalities of the night, but vainly as before. The
dancing things on the wall waxed and waned in magnitude, approaching
and receding as they trod their morbid and menacing measure. And the
aspect of each was that of some demon clock-face with one sinister
hour always figured thereon - the dreaded, the doom-delivering hour
of four.
Baffled in every
attempt to shake off the circling and relentless delirium, I glanced
once more toward the unshuttered window and beheld again the monster
which had come from the grave. Horrible it had been before;
indescribable it had now become. The creature, formerly of
indeterminate substance, was now formed of red and malignant fire;
and waved repulsively its four tentacled claws - unspeakable tongues
of living flame. It stared and stared at me out of the blackness;
sneeringly, mockingly; now advancing, now retiring. Then, in the
tenebrous silence, those four writhing talons of fire beckoned
invitingly to their demoniacally dancing counterparts on the walls,
and seemed to beat time rhythmically to the shocking saraband till
the world was one ghoulishly gyrating vortex of leaping, prancing,
gliding, leering, taunting, threatening four o’clocks.
Somewhere,
beginning afar off and advancing slowly over the sphinx like sea and
the febrile marshes, I heard the early morning wind come soughing;
faintly at first, then louder and louder until its unceasing burden
flowed as a deluge of whirring, buzzing cacophony bringing always the
hideous threat, ‘four o’clock, four o’clock, FOUR
O’CLOCK.’ Monotonously it grew from a whimper to a deafening
roar, as of a giant cataract, but finally reached a climax and began
to subside. As it receded into the distance it left upon my sensitive
ears such a vibration as is left by the passing of a swift and
ponderous railway train; this, and a stark dread whose intensity gave
it something of the tranquility of resignation.
The end is near.
All sound and vision have become one vast chaotic maelstrom of
lethal, clamorous menace, wherein are fused all the ghastly and
unhallowed four o’clocks which have existed since immemorial time
began, and all which will exist in eternities to come. The flaming
monster is advancing closely now, its charnel tentacles brushing my
face and its talons curving hungrily as they grope toward my throat.
At last I can see its face through the churning and phosphorescent
vapors of the graveyard air, and with devastating pangs I realize
that it is in essence an awful, colossal, gargoyle-like caricature of
his face—the face of him from whose uneasy grave it has
issued. Now I know that my doom is indeed sealed; that the wild
threats of the madman were in truth the demon maledictions of a
potent fiend, and that my innocence will prove no protection against
the malign volition which craves a causeless vengeance. He is
determined to pay me with interest for what he suffered at that
spectral hour; determined to drag me out of the world into realms
which only the mad and the devil-ridden know.
And as amidst the
seething of hell’s flames and the tumult of the damned those fiery
claws point murderously at my throat, I hear upon the mantel the
faint whirring sound of a timepiece; the whirring which tells me that
it is about to strike the hour whose name now flows incessantly from
the death-like and cavernous throat of the rattling, jeering,
croaking grave-monster before me—the accursed, the infernal hour
of four o’clock.
Recently,
I have begun reading biographical sketches of the masters of horror
fiction. (Should you care to join me in this interesting and
entertaining pastime, Ranker
provides a good list of such authors.)
During
a period of poverty, he subsisted
on nothing more than a loaf of bread, a chunk of cheese and a can of
beans.
Throughout
his life, he corresponded
with a good many people, including writers he mentored through his
letters, whose ranks include August Derleth, Donald Wandrei (The
Web of Easter Island),
and Robert Bloch (Psycho).
As
a child, he believed that the gods of ancient Greek mythology were
real, while the Judaeo-Christian God was merely a myth (S. T. Joshi,
I Am
Providence),
and he later turned to astrology as his guiding light. Once
interested in anatomy (as well as chemistry), his passion for the
former ended when he encountered the puzzling topic of the human
reproductive system (Joshi).
Throughout
his early years, he suffered several bouts of depression and “nervous
breakdowns.” Perhaps he feared suffering the same fate as his
father Winfield Scott Lovecraft, who was institutionalized when
Lovecraft was a youth; it seems that Winfield had been given to doing
and saying strange things” prior to his commitment (Joshi).
He
married
Sonia Greene, whose work as a milliner earned her a good income.
After two years, their childless relationship ended, when they
separated. Lovecraft's assurance that they were divorced allowed
Sonia to marry again, but she discovered, later, that she was, in
fact, still married to Lovecraft and, as a result, was guilty of
bigamy.
According
to a variety of critics, his fiction is replete with such themes as
forbidden knowledge, otherworldly influences, innate depravity, the
rule of fate, threats to civilization, white supremacy, the
potentially negative effects of scientism, an emphasis on polytheism,
“cosmic indifference,” superstition, and an imaginary and
recurrent geography unique to his fiction. He has been criticized for
racism, homophobia, misogyny, and parochialism. His writing is not
highly regarded by literary critics, although Stephen
King, Ramsey
Campbell, Bentley
Little, Joe
R. Lansdale, Alan
Moore, F.
Paul Wilson, William
S. Burroughs, Neil
Gaiman, and others name Lovecraft as a major
influence on their own conceptions of horror fiction and their
own writing.
Although
he lived forever on the brink of absolute poverty, Lovecraft's
cosmicism
has influenced horror fiction.
Sometimes, in demonstrating how to brainstorm about an essay topic, selecting horror movies, I ask students to name the titles of as many such movies as spring to mind (seldom a difficult feat for them, as the genre remains quite popular among young adults). Then, I ask them to identify the monster, or threat--the antagonist, to use the proper terminology--that appears in each of the films they have named. Again, this is usually a quick and easy task. Finally, I ask them to group the films’ adversaries into one of three possible categories: natural, paranormal, or supernatural. This is where the fun begins.
It’s a simple enough matter, usually, to identify the threats which fall under the “natural” label, especially after I supply my students with the scientific definition of “nature”: everything that exists as either matter or energy (which are, of course, the same thing, in different forms--in other words, the universe itself. The supernatural is anything which falls outside, or is beyond, the universe: God, angels, demons, and the like, if they exist. Mad scientists, mutant cannibals (and just plain cannibals), serial killers, and such are examples of natural threats. So far, so simple.
What about borderline creatures, though? Are vampires, werewolves, and zombies, for example, natural or supernatural? And what about Freddy Krueger? In fact, what does the word “paranormal” mean, anyway? If the universe is nature and anything outside or beyond the universe is supernatural, where does the paranormal fit into the scheme of things?
According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, the word “paranormal,” formed of the prefix “para,” meaning alongside, and “normal,” meaning “conforming to common standards, usual,” was coined in 1920. The American Heritage Dictionary defines “paranormal” to mean “beyond the range of normal experience or scientific explanation.” In other words, the paranormal is not supernatural--it is not outside or beyond the universe; it is natural, but, at the present, at least, inexplicable, which is to say that science cannot yet explain its nature. The same dictionary offers, as examples of paranormal phenomena, telepathy and “a medium’s paranormal powers.”
Wikipedia offers a few other examples of such phenomena or of paranormal sciences, including the percentages of the American population which, according to a Gallup poll, believes in each phenomenon, shown here in parentheses: psychic or spiritual healing (54), extrasensory perception (ESP) (50), ghosts (42), demons (41), extraterrestrials (33), clairvoyance and prophecy (32), communication with the dead (28), astrology (28), witchcraft (26), reincarnation (25), and channeling (15); 36 percent believe in telepathy.
As can be seen from this list, which includes demons, ghosts, and witches along with psychics and extraterrestrials, there is a confusion as to which phenomena and which individuals belong to the paranormal and which belong to the supernatural categories. This confusion, I believe, results from the scientism of our age, which makes it fashionable for people who fancy themselves intelligent and educated to dismiss whatever cannot be explained scientifically or, if such phenomena cannot be entirely rejected, to classify them as as-yet inexplicable natural phenomena. That way, the existence of a supernatural realm need not be admitted or even entertained. Scientists tend to be materialists, believing that the real consists only of the twofold unity of matter and energy, not dualists who believe that there is both the material (matter and energy) and the spiritual, or supernatural. If so, everything that was once regarded as having been supernatural will be regarded (if it cannot be dismissed) as paranormal and, maybe, if and when it is explained by science, as natural. Indeed, Sigmund Freud sought to explain even God as but a natural--and in Freud’s opinion, an obsolete--phenomenon.
Meanwhile, among skeptics, there is an ongoing campaign to eliminate the paranormal by explaining them as products of ignorance, misunderstanding, or deceit. Ridicule is also a tactic that skeptics sometimes employ in this campaign. For example, The Skeptics’ Dictionarycontends that the perception of some “events” as being of a paranormal nature may be attributed to “ignorance or magical thinking.” The dictionary is equally suspicious of each individual phenomenon or “paranormal science” as well. Concerning psychics’ alleged ability to discern future events, for example, The Skeptic’s Dictionary quotes Jay Leno (“How come you never see a headline like 'Psychic Wins Lottery'?”), following with a number of similar observations:
Psychics don't rely on psychics to warn them of impending disasters. Psychics don't predict their own deaths or diseases. They go to the dentist like the rest of us. They're as surprised and disturbed as the rest of us when they have to call a plumber or an electrician to fix some defect at home. Their planes are delayed without their being able to anticipate the delays. If they want to know something about Abraham Lincoln, they go to the library; they don't try to talk to Abe's spirit. In short, psychics live by the known laws of nature except when they are playing the psychic game with people.
In An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult and Supernatural, James Randi, a magician who exercises a skeptical attitude toward all things alleged to be paranormal or supernatural, takes issue with the notion of such phenomena as well, often employing the same arguments and rhetorical strategies as The Skeptic’s Dictionary.
In short, the difference between the paranormal and the supernatural lies in whether one is a materialist, believing in only the existence of matter and energy, or a dualist, believing in the existence of both matter and energy and spirit. If one maintains a belief in the reality of the spiritual, he or she will classify such entities as angels, demons, ghosts, gods, vampires, and other threats of a spiritual nature as supernatural, rather than paranormal, phenomena. He or she may also include witches (because, although they are human, they are empowered by the devil, who is himself a supernatural entity) and other natural threats that are energized, so to speak, by a power that transcends nature and is, as such, outside or beyond the universe. Otherwise, one is likely to reject the supernatural as a category altogether, identifying every inexplicable phenomenon as paranormal, whether it is dark matter or a teenage werewolf. Indeed, some scientists dedicate at least part of their time to debunking allegedly paranormal phenomena, explaining what natural conditions or processes may explain them, as the author of The Serpent and the Rainbow explains the creation of zombies by voodoo priests.
Based upon my recent reading of Tzvetan Todorov's The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to the Fantastic, I add the following addendum to this essay.
According to Todorov:
The fantastic. . . lasts only as long as a certain hesitation [in deciding] whether or not what they [the reader and the protagonist] perceive derives from "reality" as it exists in the common opinion. . . . If he [the reader] decides that the laws of reality remain intact and permit an explanation of the phenomena described, we can say that the work belongs to the another genre [than the fantastic]: the uncanny. If, on the contrary, he decides that new laws of nature must be entertained to account for the phenomena, we enter the genre of the marvelous (The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre, 41).
Todorov further differentiates these two categories by characterizing the uncanny as “the supernatural explained” and the marvelous as “the supernatural accepted” (41-42).
Interestingly, the prejudice against even the possibility of the supernatural’s existence which is implicit in the designation of natural versus paranormal phenomena, which excludes any consideration of the supernatural, suggests that there are no marvelous phenomena; instead, there can be only the uncanny. Consequently, for those who subscribe to this view, the fantastic itself no longer exists in this scheme, for the fantastic depends, as Todorov points out, upon the tension of indecision concerning to which category an incident belongs, the natural or the supernatural. The paranormal is understood, by those who posit it, in lieu of the supernatural, as the natural as yet unexplained.
And now, back to a fate worse than death: grading students’ papers.
Anyone who becomes an aficionado of anything tends, eventually, to develop criteria for elements or features of the person, place, or thing of whom or which he or she has become enamored. Horror fiction--admittedly not everyone’s cuppa blood--is no different (okay, maybe it’s a little different): it, too, appeals to different fans, each for reasons of his or her own. Of course, in general, book reviews, the flyleaves of novels, and movie trailers suggest what many, maybe even most, readers of a particular type of fiction enjoy, but, right here, right now, I’m talking more specifically--one might say, even more eccentrically. In other words, I’m talking what I happen to like, without assuming (assuming makes an “ass” of “u” and “me”) that you also like the same. It’s entirely possible that you will; on the other hand, it’s entirely likely that you won’t.
Anyway, this is what I happen to like in horror fiction:
Small-town settings in which I get to know the townspeople, both the good, the bad, and the ugly. For this reason alone, I’m a sucker for most of Stephen King’s novels. Most of them, from 'Salem's Lot to Under the Dome, are set in small towns that are peopled by the good, the bad, and the ugly. Part of the appeal here, granted, is the sense of community that such settings entail.
Isolated settings, such as caves, desert wastelands, islands, mountaintops, space, swamps, where characters are cut off from civilization and culture and must survive and thrive or die on their own, without assistance, by their wits and other personal resources. Many are the examples of such novels and screenplays, but Alien, The Shining, The Descent, Desperation, and The Island of Dr. Moreau, are some of the ones that come readily to mind.
Total institutions as settings. Camps, hospitals, military installations, nursing homes, prisons, resorts, spaceships, and other worlds unto themselves are examples of such settings, and Sleepaway Camp, Coma, The Green Mile, and Aliens are some of the novels or films that take place in such settings.
Anecdotal scenes--in other words, short scenes that showcase a character--usually, an unusual, even eccentric, character. Both Dean Koontz and the dynamic duo, Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child, excel at this, so I keep reading their series (although Koontz’s canine companions frequently--indeed, almost always--annoy, as does his relentless optimism).
Atmosphere, mood, and tone. Here, King is king, but so is Bentley Little. In the use of description to terrorize and horrify, both are masters of the craft.
Believable characters. Stephen King, Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child, and Dan Simmons are great at creating characters that stick to readers’ ribs.
Innovation. Bram Stoker demonstrates it, especially in his short story “Dracula’s Guest,” as does H. P. Lovecraft, Edgar Allan Poe, Shirley Jackson, and a host of other, mostly classical, horror novelists and short story writers. For an example, check out my post on Stoker’s story, which is a real stoker, to be sure. Stephen King shows innovation, too, in ‘Salem’s Lot, The Shining, It, and other novels. One might even argue that Dean Koontz’s something-for-everyone, cross-genre writing is innovative; he seems to have been one of the first, if not the first, to pen such tales.
Technique. Check out Frank Peretti’s use of maps and his allusions to the senses in Monster; my post on this very topic is worth a look, if I do say so myself, which, of course, I do. Opening chapters that accomplish a multitude of narrative purposes (not usually all at once, but successively) are attractive, too, and Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child are as good as anyone, and better than many, at this art.
A connective universe--a mythos, if you will, such as both H. P. Lovecraft and Stephen King, and, to a lesser extent, Dean Koontz, Bentley Little, and even Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child have created through the use of recurring settings, characters, themes, and other elements of fiction.
A lack of pretentiousness. Dean Koontz has it, as do Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child, Bentley Little, and (to some extent, although he has become condescending and self-indulgent of late, Stephen King); unfortunately, both Dan Simmons and Robert McCammon have become too self-important in their later works, Simmons almost to the point of becoming unreadable. Come on, people, you’re writing about monsters--you should be humble.
Longevity. Writers who have been around for a while usually get better, Stephen King, Dan Simmons, and Robert McCammon excepted.
Pacing. Neither too fast nor too slow. Dean Koontz is good, maybe the best, here, of contemporary horror writers.