Copyright 2019 by Gary L. Pullman
For a while, Hollywood
milked extraterrestrial creatures as its “other” of the day.
Their appearance alone suggested that these alien creatures were not
like us. They were huge, gelatinous blobs. They were strange mermen
from beyond the stars (or from the bottom of a black lagoon.) They
were macrocephlic humanoids with green skin or gray-skinned humanoids
with phallic heads. They were crawling eyes. They absorbed prey;
devoured prey; and, if their quarry were women, mated with prey.
Something unexpected might
bring these otherworldly monsters to their knees. The Blob couldn't
stand cold temperatures. The green, big-headed saucer men couldn't
bear the bright beams of automobile headlights. Bullets take out the
creature from the black lagoon. If there's a theme here, it seems to
be that, despite appearances, these otherworldly creatures aren't so
tough after all; ordinary, everyday things—cold, headlights,
bullets—are too much for them to handle. Sure, such threats may
look dangerous, but
appearances can be deceiving.
Horror
horrifies, until it isn't so horrible, after all, and what makes it
not so horrible after all is everydayness. The ordinary deflates,
destroys, and dispatches the horrific. We weren't really in much
danger, after all. The “otherness” of the other turns out to be
not so much different from us, after all; indeed, if anything, we
prove more adaptable, more innovative, more powerful—in a word,
superior.
That,
if anything, was the theme of the movies of the fifties.
What
about the themes of the tens—the 2010s?
According
to one interpretation, Pathos
(2009), set in a dystopian
future world in which thought is prohibited and people depend upon
artificial intelligence and virtual reality for not only their
pleasure, but also their own personal experiences and identities, is
a satire concerning consumerism taken to extremes.
Although
existentialism suggests that human nature does not exist, but is,
instead, created by each individual according to his or her exercise
of free will, Loophole
(2109) takes something of a Cartesian point of view, suggesting that
to be human is to be violent. Instead of Descartes's dictum, “I
think; therefore, I am,” Loophole
implies, “I am violent; therefore, I am.” According to a film
review,
these philosophical implications also have religious significance:
Suddenly,
mass hysteria takes hold across the major cities of America as people
are tested and marked with or without. In a matter of days, the
beginning of a New World Order takes the stage and, quite
unexpectedly, we find ourselves in the middle of a Biblical battle
that has long been dormant.
For
some, the progress of the plot may seem to evangelistic; others are
likely to enjoy the movie's religious dimensions.
Two
films don't nearly constitute a representative sample, of course, but
these movies, alt
least, suggest that at least some of the films of the 2010s turn
inward for their subject matter, focusing on the eternal questions
related to being human: what is human nature and how do human beings
fit into the larger scheme of things?
Older
sci fi-horror movies were concerned with departures from the status
quo: could such deviations endanger the community or even the world?
If we lost our place in the grand scheme of things, what would become
of us, as individuals? The comforting answer lay in the very
everydayness that the extraterrestrial threats threatened. The
threats to the existing order were no match for customary, the
habitual, the traditional, the routine of people's routine,
day-to-day lives.
More
recent sci fi-horror films, in part, at least, return to a
questioning of the age-old problems of philosophy and religion: human
identity, human nature, the human condition, the relationship of the
self and other. The eternal quest is undertaken yet again, with the
protagonist and the viewer at the center of things; human existence,
if not existence-itself, is egocentric. Everything revolves around
us; it's all about us.
We have gone from complacency to narcissism in only seven decades.
No comments:
Post a Comment