From Conspiracy Theory to Thriller

I have enjoyed writing Chillers and Thrillers, but I am turning my attention to other matters and must discontinue updating this blog, for the foreseeable future, at least. Thank you to all my readers and “followers.” I hope that you have enjoyed reading the potpourri of articles that have appeared here and, if you have not read all that is available, I hope that you will find some more articles of interest to you in Chillers and Thrillers archives. As a parting contribution, I offer you From Conspiracy Theory to Thriller.

Cheers.



From Conspiracy Theory To Thriller

Copyright 2011 by Gary L. Pullman

This handout will help you to create your own conspiracy theory as a basis for writing a synopsis for a thriller that you can then develop into a full-fledged novel using the plotting templates included for this purpose.

First, the handout identifies the specific objectives for this course.

Next, it identifies the reason that many people are interested in conspiracy theories in general.

Then, the handout identifies the specific elements that are typical of conspiracy theories and analyzes two actual conspiracy theories in relation to these elements, listing the types of characters that typically appear in thrillers involving conspiracy theories.

(This handout also contains four appendices: One provides a list of other actual conspiracy theories; the second lists single-sentence ideas that could become “starters” for developing a full-fledged conspiracy theory as the basis of a thriller; the third identifies authors of thrillers and various thriller novels as references, should you want to research and analyze them on your own, as further practice in preparation for developing your own conspiracy theory; and the fourth summarizes some pseudo-scientific, allegedly non-fiction books concerning supposed conspiracies--all of which were bestsellers!)

You will be invited to develop your own, original conspiracy theory as a basis for a thriller, using the same strategies that actual conspiracy theorists often employ. You will then have the opportunity of obtaining classroom responses and suggestions concerning your theory. In addition, to evaluate your conspiracy theory, for revision purposes, the handout identifies the type of evidence that conspiracy theorists typically provide to support their claims; you can use similar evidence to support your theory’s assertions.

Finally, the handout summarizes dramatic structure, as analyzed by Gustav Freytag, and provides a fill-in-the blanks plotting template, complete with an example that shows its application, which you can use to plot your own thriller, based upon the original conspiracy theory that you have developed.

During the workshop, the instructor will further explain and demonstrate the concepts and techniques introduced in this handout.

Objectives

From Conspiracy Theory To Thriller uses the following three steps to help you develop an original, full-fledged conspiracy theory of your own that you can then use to generate a synopsis for a full-length thriller:

Using the elements of actual conspiracy theories, develop a specific conspiracy of your own. (These elements will first be identified and clarified, as various actual conspiracy theories are examined.)

Develop a synopsis of your novel’s plot, based upon your conspiracy, using one of the plot-development tools presented in the course. (Handouts will be provided and explained in class.)

Create a platform for further novels (sequels) based upon the same conspiracy.

First, the Why

Why do some people believe in conspiracy theories? Michael Shermer, author of “Why people Believe in Conspiracies,” an online Scientific American article, has a few ideas concerning this topic:


Why do people believe in highly improbable conspiracies? In previous columns I have provided partial answers, citing patternicity (the tendency to find meaningful patterns in random noise) and agenticity (the bent to believe the world is controlled by invisible intentional agents). Cnspiracy theories connect the dots of random events into meaningful patterns and then infuse those patterns with intentional agency. Add to those propensities the confirmation bias (which seeks and finds confirmatory evidence for what we already believe) and the hindsight bias (which tailors after-the-fact explanations to what we
already know happened), and we have the foundation for conspiratorial cognition

(http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=why-people-believe-in-conspiracies).
 
Conspiracy Theory Elements

A conspiracy typically possesses these elements:

A well-funded, clandestine group or organization with a nefarious agenda, which they seek to keep secret (the agenda includes the motive or purpose of the conspiracy). The agenda could be to cover up the cause or purpose of an event (the AIDS virus as a means of exterminating African-Americans); to suppress the truth about the nature of an action or an event (the moon landing); to initiate an event or a series of events (usher in the Fourth Reich); to end a regime, organization, order, or organization (to destroy democracy from within the American political system); to introduce social or political changes (institutionalize special rights for a small segment of the general population); or to deny that an historical event or series of events occurred (the Holocaust or the moon landing).

The use of esoteric knowledge (alchemy, art, secret codes); sophisticated deception (doctored technology, historical revisionism, systematic propaganda, misdirection and redirection); or scientific, medical or technological means (viruses, parasites, chemical poisoning or contamination); or intimidation and force (martial law, incarceration, or public beatings, maiming, and executions) to implement and execute the conspiracy.

A scheme that involves the initiation of a specific event or set of events that has a particular, focused objective (the assassination of President John F. Kennedy); an ongoing series of conspiratorial activities with broad goals and a social, a national, or a global end (genocide against an ethnic group or the takeover of a country through the infiltration of its government or educational system); a hierarchical confederation of several conspiracy groups with at least a few overlapping or common goals (international capitalists’ control of government, economic, educational, and religious organizations); or an historical process among one or more conspirators or conspiracy organizations dedicated to securing their goals over a period of generations, centuries, or even millennia, either through sustained or recurring organizations (the Masons or the rise of subsequent “reichs”).

One person or a group of people dedicated to discovering or exposing the conspiracy. The group may be dedicated amateurs or experts, and they may be organized loosely and informally or closely and professionally. They follow events, pursue suspected conspirators, share information with themselves and the public, store and safeguard data pertaining to their investigations, and protect and defend themselves and one another when possible. The “truthers,” as such groups are sometimes called, may actually communicate the truth about a real conspiracy; may only believe that they are doing so; or may distort the truth to support and advance a hidden agenda of their own.

A sense of “us” (the good, law-abiding, patriotic, and ordinary citizenry) versus “them” (the corrupt, criminal, treasonous, and elitist conspirators).

In Voodoo Histories: The Role of the Conspiracy Theory in Shaping Modern History, David Aaronovitch cites seven elements that he finds to be typical of conspiracy theories, some of which have already been identified: (1) “historical precedent” (previous accounts of other conspiracy theories tend to make current conspiracy theories seem more plausible for those who are inclined to believe such theories in the first place); (2) “skeptics and sheeple” (the same as a sense of “us” versus “them,” identified in the last bullet, above); (3) “just asking questions” (conspiracy theorists pretend that they themselves do not necessarily subscribe to the conspiracy theory but are only making enquiries about bizarre incidents that may or may nor be related to one another, although “the questions asked. . . only make sense if the questioner really believes that there is indeed a secret conspiracy”); (4) “expert witnesses” (conspiracy theorists use statements by celebrity or expert witnesses to “validate their theories,” but the theorists are sometimes “opaque about the qualifications of their experts”); (5) “academic credibility” (conspiracy theorists “work hard to give their written evidence the veneer of scholarship” by supplying an abundance of footnotes and often extraneous, but voluminous information and a plethora of “quotations from non-conspiracist sources”); (6) “convenient inconvenient truths” (the fitting of new facts and arguments, including counterarguments and contradictory data into the conspiracy; explaining away contradictory facts and statements by labeling them as examples of “deliberate disinformation originating with the imagined plotters” or otherwise making excuses that twist or deny the contrary evidence so as to make it fit the conspiracy theory; and (7) “under surveillance” (implying that those who seek to expose the conspiracy theory are in danger from government agents, anonymous persons, or other public personnel or private individuals).

Conspiracy Elements Exemplified: Two Actual Conspiracy

The Pearl Harbor Conspiracy Theory

The claim that the president and military commanders purposely allowed the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor is a conspiracy theory, not an actual historical event. The theory goes like this:

Although he received a message from the U. S. Navy on December 6, 1941, that the Japanese government had sent to its embassy in Washington, D. C., announcing that Japan had terminated diplomatic relations with the United States, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt took no action. The U. S. Army commander was General George C. Marshall, and the U. S. Navy commander was Admiral Harold R. Stark. The U. S. government suspected that, should the U. S. come under enemy attack, the strike would be directed against Pearl Harbor. Nevertheless, neither Roosevelt, Marshall nor Stark notified Admiral Husband E. Kimmel, the commander of the Pacific Fleet, which was stationed at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, or the unit’s commanding general, Walter Short, of the imminent attack.

Marshall and Stark later testified that they had not notified Kimmel or Short because they did not want to confuse them with any more intercepted messages from the Japanese. When the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, both the base and the fleet were unprepared to defend themselves and 4,575 servicemen were killed in the “surprise” attack. Although both Marshall and Stark were found guilty of dereliction of duty for not having notified Kimmel and Short of the imminent attack on Pearl Harbor, these findings were kept from the public. Not until eleven days after the attack did the Roberts Commission, led by U. S. Supreme Court Justice Owen Roberts, find what it declared was the truth concerning the matter. According to the Commission, Kimmel and Short were the culprits. The Commission’s meetings were held behind closed doors, and Kimmel and Short were forced to retire. Some found the Commission’s proceedings questionable, including Admiral William Standley, a Roberts Commission panelist, who characterized Roberts’ actions as “crooked as a snake.”

There were another seven investigations of the Pearl Harbor attack, one of which, conducted jointly by the House and the Senate, included the testimony of Marshall and Stark that they could not recall their whereabouts on the night that Roosevelt declared war on Japan. However, their claims were contradicted by a friend of Frank Knox, the Secretary of the Navy, who said that Marshall and Stark were with Knox and Roosevelt in the White House, waiting for the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor so that the U. S. could enter World War II. According to historian John Toland, Marshall told his senior officers, “Gentlemen, this goes to the grave with us.” Short, who had considered Marshall a personal friend, felt betrayed by Marshall’s actions in allowing him to take the fall for the Pearl Harbor attack.

There was more than one warning that the Japanese were about to bomb Pearl Harbor, including a Japanese message containing the phrase “east wind, rain,” which was know by U. S. military intelligence as the Japanese code for war against the United States. However, U. S. government officials denied that the “winds” message was ever sent or received. In addition, three days before the attack on Pearl Harbor, Australian intelligence sent a warning to Washington that it had seen a fleet of Japanese aircraft carriers bound for Hawaii, but Roosevelt dismissed this warning as a rumor initiated, for political purposes, by the Republican Party.

Toland concludes that Roosevelt acted on purpose to suppress the warnings he’d received concerning the imminent attack on Pearl Harbor because he wanted the U. S. to enter the war. “A small group of men,” he wrote, “revered and held to be most honorable by millions, had convinced themselves that it was necessary to act dishonorably for the good of their nation--and incited the war that Japan had tried [by announcing its intentions ahead of time to attack Pearl Harbor] to avoid.” Rear Admiral Robert A. Theobald, who commanded the destroyers at Pearl Harbor, agreed: “This was the president’s problem, and his solution was based on the simple fact that, while it takes two to make a fight, either one may start it.”

The Pearl Harbor Conspiracy Theory Elements

Again, it is important to remember that the claim that the president and military commanders purposely allowed the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor is a conspiracy theory, not an actual historical event.

Here’s how the Pearl Harbor conspiracy theory stacks up against the list of conspiracy elements identified earlier:

A well-funded, clandestine group or organization with a nefarious agenda, which they seek to keep secret (the agenda will include the motive or purpose of the conspiracy). President Roosevelt and the commanders of the U. S. Army (General Marshall) and the U. S. Navy (Admiral Stark) withheld warnings that the Japanese were about to attack Pearl Harbor from the fleet commander, Admiral Kimmel, and the base commander, General Short.

The use of esoteric knowledge or scientific, medical, or technological means to implement and execute the conspiracy. The military suppressed the truth about the culpability of Marshall and Stark, who withheld the warnings of the Japanese’s planned attack on Pearl Harbor and lied about their whereabouts on the night that the president declared war against Japan, and the Roberts Commission convicted Kimmel and Short, in closed meetings, as the government’s scapegoats, forcing them to retire. Several messages used codes known by U. S. military intelligence and other intelligence organizations, such as that of the Australian government.

A scheme that involves the initiation of a specific event or set of events that has a particular, focused objective; an ongoing series of conspiratorial activities with broad goals and a social, a national, or a global end; a hierarchical confederation of several conspiracy groups with at least a few overlapping or common goals; or an historical process among one or more conspirators or conspiracy organizations dedicated to securing their goals over a period of generations, centuries, or even millennia, either through sustained or recurring organizations. Roosevelt and his conspirators wanted to involve the United States in World War II by allowing the Japanese to attack the U. S. fleet anchored at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Their actions later led to cover-ups by the Roberts Commission, the joint Congressional hearings, and other investigations.

One person or a group of people dedicated to discovering or exposing the conspiracy. The group may be dedicated amateurs or experts, and they may be organized loosely and informally or closely and professionally. The “truthers,” as such groups are sometimes called, may actually communicate the truth about a real conspiracy; may only believe that they are doing so; or may distort the truth to support and advance a hidden agenda of their own. An historian, several high-ranking U. S. military officers, and others sought to expose the Roosevelt conspiracy.

A sense of “us” (the good, law-abiding, patriotic, and ordinary citizenry) versus “them” (the corrupt, criminal, treasonous, and elitist conspirators). In Toland‘s words, “A small group of men, revered and held to be most honorable by millions, had convinced themselves that it was necessary to act dishonorably for the good of their nation--and incited the war that Japan had tried to avoid.”

The Denver International Airport Conspiracy Theory

The claim that the Denver International Airport is the headquarters of the New World Order’s leaders is a theory, not an actual fact. The theory goes like this:

The peculiar features of the Denver International Airport prove that it is the new World Order’s secret headquarters. Code words of possible Satanic or Masonic significance are carved into the terminal floor: Cochetopa, Sisnaajini, Dzit Dit Gaii, Braaksma, and Villarreal.

A dedication marker is inscribed with Masonic symbols (the compass and the square), and mention is made, on the marker, of two Freemason lodges in Colorado. In addition, the marker is mounted above a time capsule that was sealed during the airport’s dedication--a time capsule which may, in fact, also be a keypad with a secret purpose related to the future of the New World Order or the New World Airport Commission, which is also named on the dedication marker.

A large portion of the terminal, called the Great Hall, is named for the great hall of the Freemason lodges. Murals inside the airport depict bizarre situations and images, including a Nazi-like figure stabbing a white dove with the tip of his scimitar, dead children (an African-American, a Christian, and a Jew) laid out inside open coffins, and children worshiping a strange, rainbow-colored flower.

Outside, a huge, wild, malevolent horse with red (radioactive?) eyes rears against the sky. The configurations, or layout, of the airport’s runways are shaped like Nazi swastikas. The airport takes up twice the space of Manhattan, New York, and rests atop an underground military base, which includes space for the headquarters of the New World Order and vast holding cells for future political prisoners.

The Denver International Airport Conspiracy Theory Elements

Again, it is important to remember that the claim that the Denver International Airport is the headquarters of the New World Order’s leaders is a theory, not an actual fact.

Here’s how the Denver International Airport conspiracy theory stacks up against the list of conspiracy elements identified earlier:

A well-funded clandestine group or organization with a nefarious agenda, which they seek to keep secret (the agenda will include the motive or purpose of the conspiracy). The Freemasons and the New World Airport Commission build an airport full of strange codes, images, and symbols on a plot of ground twice as large as Manhattan.

The use of esoteric knowledge or scientific, medical, or technological means to implement and execute the conspiracy. The airport includes strange codes carved into the floor, bizarre murals depicting horrific scenes involving various ethnic and religious groups and containing esoteric images, and a keypad associated with a time capsule.

A scheme that involves the initiation of a specific event or set of events which have a particular, focused objective; an ongoing series of conspiratorial activities with broad goals and a social, a national, or a global end; a hierarchical confederation of several conspiracy groups with at least a few overlapping or common goals; or an historical process among one or more conspirators or conspiracy organizations dedicated to securing their goals over a period of generations, centuries, or even millennia, either through sustained or recurring organizations.

The airport is home to the underground headquarters of the New World Order and includes holding cells for hundreds, perhaps thousands, of future political prisoners.

One person or a group of people dedicated to exposing the discovering or exposing the conspiracy. Such a group may be dedicated amateurs or experts, and they may be organized loosely and informally or closely and professionally. The “truthers,” as such groups are sometimes called, may actually communicate the truth about a real conspiracy; may only believe that they are doing so; or may distort the truth to support and advance a hidden agenda of their own. Christians and other groups have photographed and posted pictures of the airport and its peculiar features on the Internet to publicize the existence of the New World Order’s headquarters to millions and to expose its secrets. Other individuals and groups have produced online videos that interpret and explain the secret codes, images, and symbols and relate the history of the airport’s construction.

A sense of “us” (the good, law-abiding, patriotic, and ordinary citizenry) versus “them” (the corrupt, criminal, treasonous, and elitist conspirators). “They” are the New World Order/Masonic conspirators, who want to take over the world, institute a new totalitarian sociopolitical-economic order, and enslave “us,” the everyday citizens of a democratic and capitalistic society, who honors and respects individual liberty.

Types of Characters

Like any other genre, the thriller has developed several specific types of characters who tend to recur throughout these novels. Some of these types include government agents, spies, police detectives, private detectives, scientists, computer experts, weapons experts, disguise artists, mercenaries, martial arts experts, military personnel, and adventurers.

In addition to these types of characters, thrillers often people their pages with characters who are called for by the situations of the novels’ individual plots, including situations based upon conspiracy theories. The type of conspiracy theory often suggests the specific, even specialized, characters that are apt to be relatively distinctive to a particular storyline of this type.
In addition to the general types of characters common to thrillers as a whole, those derived from a conspiracy theory might also include:

World leaders

Members of secret societies

Business tycoons

Extraterrestrial beings

Agents of disinformation and intimidation

Prison officials and guards

Hollywood producers, directors, actors, and other personnel

Assassins

“Truthers” (fanatics dedicated to collecting evidence about the conspiracy and to exposing it to the public)

Victims of the conspiracy (and innocent bystanders)

Investigative reporters

Television or radio talk show hosts

Guides or scouts

Members of ethnic, minority, or special interest groups

“Deep Throats” (that is, insiders who defect from a conspiracy group, often supplying intelligence concerning the group to
“Truthers,” investigators, media personnel, or other interested parties)

Note: Refer to Appendix 1 an annotate list of additional conspiracy theories.

Create Your Own Conspiracy Theory

In discussing how “Truthers” twist the truth to supposedly debunk conspiracy theories, Christopher Hodapp and Alice Von Kanno, the authors of Conspiracy Theories and Secret Societies for Dummies, provide a blueprint for authors of thrillers who want to create their own conspiracy theories in order to add adventure, zest, and excitement to their fiction.

Their sidebar debunking of the “documentary” Loose Change, “Screws Loose in Loose Change” (155-156), offers a textbook case. Created “by three 20-something Truthers,” Dylan Avery, Korey Rowe, and Jason Bernas, the so-called documentary uses “unsupported assertions, scurvy intimations, and some out-and-out lies” to suggest that the events of 9/11 were results of a conspiracy (155). Included among their allegations, the authors point out, in a bulleted checklist, were the following falsehoods or misrepresentations of the facts (in bold font). Following each allegation in their bulleted checklist, Hodapp and Von Kannon debunk the “debunkers”:

The fires in the Towers weren’t hot enough to melt steel. Quite the contrary--they were plenty hot enough to weaken the girders, causing them to structurally fail under the weight of the floors above.

The Empire State Building wasn’t knocked down when it was hit by a B-52, so the [World Trade Center] WTC Towers should’ve survived the smaller plane hits. The Empire State Building wasn’t hit by a B-52. It was a much smaller, lighter B-25.

Terrorist hijackers couldn’t have been flying the planes, because the moves they executed were unsafe. What part of “they were intending to crash them” do these boys not understand?

The South Tower was hit by an unmarked, gray jet, with no airline markings. Maybe it looks unmarked when played back on an iPod, but the United paint job is undeniable in frame enlargements.

$167 billion in gold was stored under the World Trade Center and was secretly removed. It was really $230 million--not chump change, but considerably less than their outrageous claim, and all of it was recovered and accounted for.

Flight 93 didn’t crash in Pennsylvania. They claim the real Flight 93 was loaded with some 200 passengers from all four planes and landed in Cleveland, where the passengers were taken off and, presumably, “disposed of.” The problem with this one being that the total manifests of all four planes couldn’t fit onboard Flight 93. At other times, they claim Flight 93 did crash in Pennsylvania, but after being shot down by the military.

A mysterious “pod” was mounted under the fuselage of one of the planes, clear evidence that it’s a massive bomb. Both planes that hit the Trade Towers were 767-200s.

Comparisons with 767s under the same lighting show a bulge where the wings join the main body of the jet. This reckless claim was so loudly debunked that the boys quickly edited it out of subsequent versions (155-56).

The Truthers also claimed that “the phone calls from loved ones onboard the hijacked planes were phonies,” the authors say, since “pilots have never allowed passengers to use cell phones in flight.” However, under fire from the public and critics alike, the documentary’s creators retracted this claim, as they suppressed their original allegation that the airplanes were equipped with bombs. When “scientists working for Popular Mechanics were able to easily disprove their assertion about cell phones, one of these shrewd journalists said in a recent documentary on 9/11 conspiracy theories, ‘Well, we’re editing that out in our new version, because we don’t’ want to loose [sic] our credibility’” (156).

How do the authors of this conspiracy piece together their theory? It seems that they use one part unenlightened ignorance, one part innovative speculation, and one part deliberate deceit.

Alter facts to fit a preconceived view or substitute lies for facts: The fire was not hot enough to melt steel (but the fire was hot enough); the smaller, older Empire State Building survived being hit by a B-52 (although the Empire State Building was actually hit by a smaller B-25); and Flight 93 didn’t crash in Pennsylvania; it was loaded with passengers from all four planes and landed in Cleveland, where the passengers were taken off and, presumably, “disposed of” (but the total manifests of all four planes couldn’t fit onboard Flight 93)

Introduce irrelevancies that sound significant: It’s unconvincing to assume that the terrorists would commit acts that are unsafe to themselves (but they were suicidal fanatics who willingly died for their beliefs--and knowingly killed others as well).

Omit details that contradict the conspiracy theory: The planes were unmarked (but they only seem to be unmarked; when the film footage of the attack is played, the airline’s markings are clearly visible).

Exaggerate facts, especially those that suggest a motive for a hidden or secret agenda on the part of the conspirators (and, again, omit any contradictory details): $167 billion in gold, stored under the World Trade Center, was secretly removed (but it was really $230 million, all of which recovered and accounted for).

Offer a sinister interpretation of anything that appears unusual or anomalous: A “pod” under the airplane’s fuselage contained a bomb (but the “pod” was really just a bulge at the junction of the main body of the aircraft and its wing).

Eliminate (or modify) details that are easily disproved or that may cause others to summarily reject your theory: The idea that the Flight 93 passengers lied about having communicated with their families before the airplane crashed offended many and its basis (that cell phone communication with relatives was impossible aboard the flight) was disproved by scientists, so this part of the conspiracy theory was abandoned.

Let’s consider how you can use these techniques to generate a conspiracy by examining a controversial issue, such as global warming (climate change). Although more scientists than not accept as true the notion that the planet’s temperature is gradually increasing, some do not believe that such a change is taking place. Even among those who do believe that global warming is happening, some do not consider such change to be dangerous to the welfare of plants, animals, or human beings.

Let’s see how to use this controversial issue to develop a conspiracy theory.

First, there is no need to eliminate or alter facts that are “friendly” to your claim that global warming is the product of a conspiracy among scientists and government officials who one to get rich quick off by promoting the supposed dangers of climate change. These facts seem friendly to the idea of global warming as a conspiracy theory rather than a reality, so you can accept them as they are:

The lack of a long-term record of temperature changes prevent scientists from ascertaining whether the warmer temperatures observed during the past few years is anything more than a temporary trend.

The data concerning global warming are sometimes unclear.

Some scientists’ belief that global warming is occurring may affect how they interpret data; they may fit the data to their assumptions rather than considering the data objectively.

If it exists, global warming may be a natural event, not one that is being caused by human behavior or the use of technology.

Even if global warming is happening, it presents no dangers to living organisms, for plants, animals, and humans will adapt to climate changes.

Now, with regard to facts that are “unfriendly” to the conspiracy theory, those that contradict, rather than support, it, use one part unenlightened ignorance, one part innovative speculation, and one part deliberate deceit, or, more specifically:

Alter facts to fit a preconceived view or substitute lies for facts.

Introduce irrelevancies that sound significant:

Omit details that contradict the conspiracy theory:

Exaggerate facts, especially those that suggest a motive for a hidden or secret agenda on the part of the conspirators.

Offer a sinister interpretation of anything that appears unusual or anomalous:

Eliminate (or modify) details that are easily disproved or that may cause others to summarily reject your theory:

Start by listing the “unfriendly;” facts: Then, fit them to the theory that global warming is a conspiracy, not a reality (changes are indicated in bold font):

Eleven of the past twelve years have been the hottest since 1850. This fact sounds impressive--if one forgets that, by the same yardstick, out of 100 years, 88 percent of them have not been unusually warm. Global warming conspirators cherry-pick their data to suggest that harmless trends as long-term conditions. (The point ignored her is that the 88 percent is unimportant; what matters is that eleven of twelve most recent years of history indicate that there is a sudden, rapid warming of the planet.)

The rate at which the planet is warming has doubled in the past century. Again, this may sound impressive, but, by scientists’ own admission, even if the planet’s temperature is increasing at such a rate, the actual increase in temperature measures only .74 degrees Celsius. (The debunking of this claim ignores the point that “even small changes in climate can have major effects” and that, according to NASA, “during the last ice age (ice ages recur roughly every 50,000 to 100,000 years), the earth's average temperature was only 5 Celsius degrees cooler than modern temperature averages”).

Up to a depth of 3,000 feet (and maybe more), oceans are warmer than they have been before.

Glaciers have decreased in both the Northern and the Southern hemispheres, causing a rise in sea levels, arctic temperatures have increased dramatically during the last century, and frozen ground in the arctic regions have thawed by seven percent since 1900. There have been more sunny days lately. However, such days are effects of weather conditions, not climate changes. (This explanation purposely confuses weather, which is “local and short-term” with climate., which is regional or global and “long-term.”)

Precipitation has increased in many rainy parts of the world and has decreased in drier regions, droughts are longer and cover more land than they have in times past, heat waves are more frequent and intense and cold spells less frequent and less intense than they have been in the past, and the intensity of tropical storms has increased. Weather conditions, which cause rain, drought, heat waves, cold spells, and tropical storms of greater or lesser intensity are also effects of the changes in weather and do not indicate any long-term climate changes. (Again, this explanation purposely confuses weather, which is “local and short-term” with climate., which is regional or global and “long-term.”)

By accepting “friendly” facts as true and explaining (or explaining away) “unfriendly” facts, a strong case can be built for global warming (or any other controversial issue) as comprising nothing more than a conspiracy on the part of people who have much to gain by frightening people with such unwarranted claims.

However, make sure that the conspirators do have a lot to gain by promulgating their conspiracy theory; otherwise, there would be no motivation for them to spend the vast amounts of time, money, and other resources to attempt to get others to believe and accept their theory as true. In the case of global warming, if it were a conspiracy theory rather than a reality, the conspirators would have much to gain through legislation that outlaws or penalizes the use of some energy sources (petroleum products, coal, and incandescent light bulbs, for example, while requiring or encouraging the use of alternative energy sources (wind, solar energy, hydroelectric generators) and activities (energy conservation, recycling).

Note: some facts and other material for this segment of this handout were quoted or paraphrased from the online article, “How Global Warming Works“ (http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/green-science/global-warming7.htm).

Use the same techniques to create a conspiracy theory of your own! (Remember to include the elements that are typical of most, if not all, actual conspiracy theories.)

Evaluating Evidence For Conspiracy Theories

Knowing how to evaluate the evidence that conspiracy theorists provide to support their claims can not only help one debunk those claims, but it can also disclose techniques that one can use him- or herself to more readily develop his or her own, original conspiracy theory.

The authors of Conspiracy Theories & Secret Societies identify a number of principles which facilitate the creation of conspiracy theories:

“Nothing happens by accident.”
“Nothing is as it seems.”
“Everything is connected “

Because facts can be twisted, they cannot be trusted.

“Lack of proof is proof.”

Conspirators “control the media, business, banks, universities, [and] governments” (among other things) and use these organizations to misdirect, deceive, suppress, and “discredit” their enemies (21-23).

The authors also identify three problems from which, “psychologists” and “psychiatrists” claim, conspiracy theorists suffer:

Conspiracy theorists suffer from apophenia: they find patterns in meaningless or disconnected images, numbers, words, and other data (the face on Mars).

Conspiracy theorists suffer from confirmation bias: they develop a theory and make all evidence conform to it, ignoring contrary evidence altogether.

Conspiracy theorists suffer from cognitive dissonance, holding mutually contradictory thoughts as true without stress (23-24).
In general, the authors point out, there are three types of conspiracy theories:



Event conspiracies
Systemic conspiracies
Super conspiracies ((24-25).
The authors recommend that conspiracy theories be tested by checking “sources” (does the author cite fellow conspiracy theorists in his or her bibliography?); check the credentials and writings of any experts who support conspiracy theories; examine whether conspiracy theorists have treated their subject in full and without bias (make sure that they have not ignored inconvenient facts); “separate facts from emotional claims”; distrust “eyewitness testimony” and other anecdotal evidence; “be alert for unsupportable statements”; and “examine how authoritative people are portrayed”: are they fairly depicted or represented as human monsters, madmen, or fools? (31-32)

Your Turn!

Use the elements typical of conspiracy theories to create your own, original conspiracy theory; this theory will become the basis for your thriller’s plot synopsis:

A well-funded, clandestine group or organization with a nefarious agenda, which they seek to keep secret (the agenda includes the motive or purpose of the conspiracy). The agenda could be to cover up the cause or purpose of an event (the AIDS virus as a means of exterminating African-Americans); to suppress the truth about the nature of an action or an event (the moon landing); to initiate an event or a series of events (usher in the Fourth Reich); to end a regime, organization, order, or organization (to destroy democracy from within the American political system); to introduce social or political changes (institutionalize special rights for a small segment of the general population); or to deny that an historical event or series of events occurred (the Holocaust or the moon landing). __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The use of esoteric knowledge (alchemy, art, secret codes); sophisticated deception (doctored technology, historical revisionism, systematic propaganda, misdirection and redirection); or scientific, medical or technological means (viruses, parasites, chemical poisoning or contamination); or intimidation and force (martial law, incarceration, or public beatings, maiming, and executions) to implement and execute the conspiracy. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

A scheme that involves the initiation of a specific event or set of events that has a particular, focused objective (the assassination of President John F. Kennedy); an ongoing series of conspiratorial activities with broad goals and a social, a national, or a global end (genocide against an ethnic group or the takeover of a country through the infiltration of its government or educational system); a hierarchical confederation of several conspiracy groups with at least a few overlapping or common goals (international capitalists’ control of government, economic, educational, and religious organizations); or an historical process among one or more conspirators or conspiracy organizations dedicated to securing their goals over a period of generations, centuries, or even millennia, either through sustained or recurring organizations (the Masons or the rise of subsequent “reichs”). __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

One person or a group of people dedicated to discovering or exposing the conspiracy. Such a group may be dedicated amateurs or experts, and they may be organized loosely and informally or closely and professionally. They follow events, pursue suspected conspirators, share information with themselves and the public, store and safeguard data pertaining to their investigations, and protect and defend themselves and one another when possible. The “truthers,” as such groups are sometimes called, may actually communicate the truth about a real conspiracy; may only believe that they are doing so; or may distort the truth to support and advance a hidden agenda of their own. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
A sense of “us” (the good, law-abiding, patriotic, and ordinary citizenry) versus “them” (the corrupt, criminal, treasonous, and elitist conspirators). _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Plot-Development Tools

The following plot-development tools will be used:

Gustav Freytag’s Analysis of Dramatic Structure
Fill-in-the-Blanks Plot Template
Gustav Freytag’s Analysis of Dramatic Structure

Literary critic Gustav Freytag divided plots into five parts, or acts: (1) exposition, (2) rising action, (3) turning point, or climax, (4) falling action, and (5) resolution (comedy) or catastrophe (tragedy). In addition, he identifies two other points: (1) the inciting moment, which concludes the exposition as it initiates the rising action and (2) an optional moment of final suspense, in which the reader or viewer is left in doubt for a moment as to whether the protagonist shall succeed or fail in his or her attempt to realize the goal that he or she has set or that has been set for him or her.

In the exposition, background information (such as the introduction of the protagonist and other characters, the identification of the setting, and the introduction of the basic, or main, conflict) is provided.

The inciting moment initiates the rising action, wherein the conflict is complicated as a series of increasingly more difficult obstacles is placed between the protagonist and his or realization of his or her goal

The turning point, or climax, occurs as the protagonist begins to succeed or fail at his or her attempt to achieve his or her goal. (In a comedy, which is defined as a story in which the main character is better off at the end of the story than he or she was at the beginning of the story, things will go badly for him or her at the beginning of the story but will begin to improve at the turning point, or climax. In a tragedy, which is defined as a story in which the main character is worse off at the end of the story than he or she was at the beginning of the story, things will go well for him or her at the beginning of the story but will begin to worsen at the turning point, or climax.)

The falling action unravels the conflict that was complicated during the rising action.

If the story is a comedy, it will end in a resolution, whereas, if it is a tragedy, it will end in a catastrophe. With this information in mind, you can use the following template to structure the plot of your story:

Fill-in-the-Blank Plot Template

Referring to your conspiracy theory, use the following template to create a synopsis of your thriller’s plot. The use of this template ensures that your novel has all the ingredients of a fully developed story: characters, motivation, conflict, suspense, setting, dramatic structure, unity, a cause-and-effect sequence among the incidents of the action, and theme.

By employing this template, you, the author, will have both an overview of your thriller’s entire plot, a guide to the writing of your novel, and the context that you need to understand the relationships of the parts of the story to the whole and the meaning of the entire story.

However, when you actually write your novel, you may wish to reorder the incidents for dramatic and narrative purposes.

For example, most thrillers begin in media res (in the middle of the action) and use flashbacks or dialogue to fill in needed exposition (explanatory or background information), and most end each chapter on a cliffhanger--a moment of high suspense that encourages readers to read the next chapter--and the next. Therefore, think of this template as a means of summarizing your plot and of including all the necessary ingredients of the story, not necessarily as the final approach that you should take in writing the novel.

Begin by defining your conspiracy in a single sentence: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The main character, ____________________, wants to ____________________ because ____________________, but he or she must struggle against ____________________, who wants ____________________ because _____________________. This story takes place in ____________________ (location) in ____________________ (time period). To attain his or her goal, ____________________ (the main character) must overcome the following, increasingly difficult obstacles: ____________________, ____________________, and ____________________ (add more if desired). For ____________________ (the main character), for whom everything goes more or less ____________________ (well or poorly) at the beginning of the story, the turning point (climax) occurs when he or she ____________________, and then the opposite state of affairs ensues, as/when things begin to _____________________ (worsen or improve) by ____________________, ____________________, and ____________________ (add more if desired). At the end of the story, ____________________ (the main character) ____________________ (attains or does not attain) his or her goal, because ____________________ (reason), learning that ____________________ (lesson learned from experience, the story’s theme) and, as a result, changes by ____________________ (how the main character changes).

 
Here is an example:

Begin by defining your conspiracy in a single sentence: To suppress protests against state-sponsored or -sanctioned activities, the United States government uses plainclothes agents, FBI and otherwise, to infiltrate political protest organizations and to incite riots.

The main character, FBI Special Agent Kimberly Wilder, wants to expose the government’s use of undercover agents to infiltrate political protest organizations and incite riots to suppress political protest against state-sponsored or -sanctioned activities because she witnessed the death of a child during one such riot, in which she was involved as an infiltrator, but she must struggle against high-level government leaders and her colleagues, who want to continue and expand these operations because they have been proven to be very effective in suppressing opposition to the government’s conduct of illegal and immoral operations. This story takes place in Washington, D. C., various other U. S. cities, and the Middle East in the present day. To attain his or her goal, Kimberly must overcome the following, increasingly difficult obstacles: gain the trust of the protesters she’s infiltrated, convince the media that she is not delusional (as the government claims) and the conspiracy exists, enlist the aid of several of her former fellow FBI agents, and avoid being captured by the government as she exposes the conspiracy. For Kimberly, for whom everything goes more or less poorly at the beginning of the story, the turning point (climax) occurs when she admits to her role in infiltrating a protest organization on national television, confessing how her actions inadvertently led to the death of an innocent child and provides the names of a half-dozen other whistleblowers, and then the opposite state of affairs ensues, as things begin to by improve when Congress initiates an investigation of the FBI and other government agencies named as conspirators and several conspirators are indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced to prison. At the end of the story, Kimberly attains her goal, because she identifies and motivates others to expose the conspiracy, learning that the will of the people and their rights as citizens outweigh the clandestine interests of a corrupt faction of the federal government and big business, and, as a result, changes by becoming a private investigator who serves as a watchdog against similar government abuses of citizens‘ rights.

Note: My idea for this storyline was inspired by an online news report, “Witnesses describe State Fair mob attacks,” by 620 WTMJ News Radio, part of which reads:

WEST ALLIS - Witnesses tell Newsradio 620 WTMJ and TODAY’S TMJ4 of a mob of young people attacking innocent fair-goers at the end of the opening night of State Fair, with some callers claiming a racially-charged scene. Milwaukee Police confirmed there were assaults outside the fair. . . .. . . “They were attacking everybody for no reason whatsoever.”
Add a single sentence that suggests that there may be a sequel

After developing your story’s synopsis, add a “However” statement at the end, suggesting that the story will continue or, in other words, that a sequel may follow.

Here’s an example:

However, Kimberly finds that the conspirators are not about to let bygones be bygones. Enraged by what they regard as her “betrayal,” a remnant of unidentified loyalists within the corrupt FBI-military cadre seek revenge, planning to put an end to her life (and, therefore, to her political and legal opposition to them), while making an example of her to others and paving the way for them to continue their suppression of political protest by violent means without her to thwart them. Meanwhile, as she dodges or frustrates their attempts to assassinate her, staying alive must become her first priority.

Assessment Checklist

Use this checklist to assess the conspiracy theory that will become the basis of the “actual” conspiracy in your thriller. Any blank in which you can add a checkmark indicates that the element associated with it is satisfactory. However, if you cannot check one or more of the blanks, your inability to do so indicates an element or elements that require improvement.

Place a checkmark in each of the blanks that precede an item that is satisfactory; if you wish, you can jot yourself notes in the blanks that follow each item on the checklist. (You may want to photocopy this checklist so that you can use it more than once.)


____ The group of conspirators is well funded by _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ The group of conspirators’ secret agenda involves _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ The group uses one of more of the following to execute its conspiracy: esoteric knowledge, sophisticated deception, scientific or medical means, intimidation and force: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ My conspiracy involves a scheme to initiate a specific event with a particular and focused objective; an ongoing series of conspiratorial activities with broad goals, and a social, national, or global end; a hierarchical confederation of several conspiracy groups with at least a few overlapping goals; or an historical process among one or more conspirators or conspiracy organizations dedicated to securing their goals over a period of generations or longer: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ My conspiracy includes a sense of “us” (the good guys) versus “them” (the bad guys): _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ My thriller features characters that are typical to the thriller genre: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ My thriller includes characters that are especially appropriate to my thriller’s particular conspiracy: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ In my conspiracy, everything is connected through cause and effect, not circumstance or coincidence: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ In my conspiracy, appearances are usually deceiving: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ Although I may have changed the sequence of events for dramatic and narrative purposes, my thriller has an exposition, a rising action, a turning point (climax), a falling action, and a resolution (if a comedy) or a catastrophe (if a tragedy) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ My thriller also has an inciting moment: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ My thriller has a moment of final suspense (not required, but strongly recommended): _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ My protagonist has a strong, believable motive for opposing the conspirators: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ My thriller contains plenty of strong, believable conflict: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ My thriller is suspenseful throughout: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ My thriller is usually fast paced: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ The incident in my thriller’s plot are related through cause and effect; nothing is merely circumstantial or coincidental: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ My thriller has appropriate and interesting settings: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____ My thriller suggests an important lesson about people or life in general: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Appendix 1: Other Examples of Conspiracy Actual Theories: A Reference List

New World Order: International elites control and manipulate governments, industry, and media organizations worldwide through the use of central banking and other means. They fund and sometimes cause most of major wars, execute false flag attacks to generate support for themselves, and control the world economy, causing inflation and depressions whenever it suits them to do so.

Federal Reserve System: Created in 1913, the Federal Reserve System is the central bank of the United States, although it is not a part of the government. It transfers wealth from the United States’ poor and middle classes to international bankers of the New World Order.

False Flag Operations: Covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, but made to appear as if they are executed by other entities.

Military-Industrial Complex: The military is in cahoots with industrialists and other big businesses to profit politically and economically from wars waged for these purposes.

Freemasonry: The many conspiracy theories pertaining to the Masons relate to the control of the government, particularly in the United States and the United Kingdom, through religious, (often anti-Christian or Satanic) and cultural (usually involving popular entertainment) means and may worship the devil.

Chemtrails: Chemtrails contain chemicals or biological agents purposely sprayed on the population by governments or other authorities.

U. S.-Extraterrestrial Allegiance: The United States government conspires with extraterrestrials in the abduction and manipulation of American citizens.

Global Warming: Dr. William Gray lists fifteen reasons for the global warming hysteria, including the need for an enemy following the end of the Cold War and the desire among scientists, government leaders, and environmentalists to find a political cause that would enable them to “organize, propagandize, force conformity and exercise political influence.
Big world government could best lead (and control) us to a better world!” In this article, Gray also identifies the election of Al Gore to the vice presidency as the start of his problems with federal funding: the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration stopped giving him research grants, as did NASA.

911: The U. S., Israel, or Iraq government orchestrated the attacks themselves.

Apollo Moon Landing: The moon landings never happened, but was faked by NASA with possible CIA and Hollywood support.

Barcodes: Barcodes are used to control citizens of a world government or are Satanic in intent.

Area 51: In Area 51, alien spacecraft (including material supposedly recovered at Roswell) are stored, examined, and reverse-engineered; alien astronauts (living and dead) are examined; and aircraft based on alien technology is manufactured.

Wingdings Font: “NYC” in Wingdings was rendered as Skull and crossbones symbol, Star of David, and thumbs up gesture to signify Bill Gates’ approval of killing Jews, especially those from New York City.

Princess Diana Assassinated: There was a plot to murder Diana, Princess of Wales, because she intended to marry Dodi Fayed, intended to convert to Islam, was pregnant, and planned to visit the holy land. Organizations responsible for her death include French Intelligence, the British Royal Family, the press, the British Intelligence services MI5 or MI6, the CIA, Mossad, the Freemasons, and/or the IRA

Appendix 2: Starters

It is often helpful to start a conspiracy theory by summarizing the gist, or general idea, of it in a single sentence that is later embellished by applying all the elements of the typical conspiracy theory and using the plot-development template to flesh out narrative details. The single-sentence summary of the conspiracy theory should explain the nature of the conspiracy, who or what is behind the conspiracy, and the purpose of the conspiracy (what the conspirators hope to gain from the conspiracy). Here are a few examples to serve as models and, perhaps, to inspire your own starters:

Aliens caused Earth’s climate change to exterminate human beings so the aliens can claim the planet for themselves.

Entrepreneurs (paranormal researchers, scholars, tour guides) create crop circles to support and further their respective careers.

Companies that gather personal and financial data from clients, ostensibly to protect their identities, use this information to steal their identities.

Top secret Area 51 is nothing more than a decoy to distract citizens and divert their attention from the actual clandestine military projects that are undertaken elsewhere.

In cooperation with a federal government behavior-modification program, cereal manufacturers put a special food additive in their products.

Signs warning of the presence of bears are purposely posted too far down the trails to warn national park visitors so that some are killed by the bears, their deaths intimidating others from visiting the parks, just as the park authorities intend.

Soft news stories are aired by powerful interest groups and government organizations to distract the public from more important commercial, economic, and political events.

To ensure future funding from public and private donors, universities coerce scientific researchers to conclude what their financers want the research to prove or disprove.

Appendix 3: A List of Thrillers

Several thrillers involve conspiracies. Among the better-known conspiracy thrillers are:

The Crying of Lot 49 (Thomas Pynchon): Protagonist Oedipa Maas must decide what is real and what is illusion when she uncovers a mysterious underground organization, Trystero (which may or may not actually exist), which vies (or seems to vie) with two mail-delivery groups that defeated it, Thurn and Taxis.

The Da Vinci Code (Dan Brown): The Priory of Sion and Opus Dei battle over the suppression of the continued bloodline of Jesus, through a child he fathered by Mary Magdalene.

Dreadful Sanctuary (Eric Frank Russell): A global conspiracy seeks to prevent humanity from reaching the stars via space travel.

Foucault’s Pendulum (Umberto Eco): Employees of a publishing company invent a conspiracy of their own, but many mistakenly believe that the theory is real; finally, even its inventors begin to wonder whether their supposedly age-old, secret plan is fictional or factual.

Gravity’s Rainbow (Thomas Pynchon): Characters seek to discover the true meaning of Schwarzgerät, a black device installed in a rocket that has been assigned an equally mysterious serial number, 00000.

Illuminatus! (Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson): An ancient and global web of conspirators may or may not have been involved in the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, his brother Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King, Jr. and may or may not have been associated with Adolph Hitler, John Dillinger, and extraterrestrial beings.

Ministry of Fear (Graham Greene): Having survived World War II, a band of Nazis seem bent upon establishing the Fourth Reich.

The Thirty-Nine Steps (John Buchan): A plot is afoot to destabilize Europe and precipitate a world war.

The Manchurian Candidate (Richard Condon): The Chinese have secretly brainwashed an American soldier to serve them as their agent and assassin.

Winter Kills (Richard Condon): The protagonist attempts to verify the deathbed confession of a man who claims that the president was not killed by a lone assassin, as a Congressional committee has determined, but by a team of killers who orchestrated the murder.

Not all of the novels listed below uses a conspiracy as the basis of their plots, but each is a thriller. (In addition to thrillers which involve conspiracies, others, as thriller author James Patterson points out, focus upon law, espionage, action-adventure, medicine, police procedures, romance, history, politics, religion, and technology (“Introduction,’ Thriller).. As such, they demonstrate the genre’s suspenseful and adventurous qualities, employing tense situations, mysteries, menaces, and other elements that, in Patterson’s words, create “an intensity of emotions . . . particularly those of apprehension and exhilaration, of excitement and breathlessness, all designed to generate that all-important thrill” (“Introduction,’ Thriller).

The following authors are especially known for the thrillers they write:

Eric Ambler
Peter Benchley
William Bernhardt
Dan Brown
Raymond Chandler
Lee Child
Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child
Tom Clancy
Mary Higgins Clark
Richard Condon
Michael Connelly
Robin Cook
Michael Crichton
Clive Cussler
Jeffrey Deaver
Ted Dekker
Joy Fielding
Ian Fleming
Ken Follett
Frederick Forsyth
W. E. B. Griffin
John Grisham
Dashiell Hammett
Thomas Harris
Stephen King
Dean Koontz
John Le Carré
John Lutz
David Morell
Perm O’Shaughnessy
Richard North Patterson
James Rollins
Craig Thomas
Scott Turow
Mary Willis Walker

Some of the more popular thrillers include:

A Stranger Is Watching (Mary Higgins Clark)
A Cry in the Night (Mary Higgins Clark)
Along Came a Spider (James Patterson)
Angels and Demons (Dan Brown)
The Big Sleep (Raymond Chandler)
The Brotherhood of the Rose (David Morell)
Clear and Present Danger (Tom Clancy)
Coma (Robin Cook)
Cujo (Stephen King)
The Da Vinci Code (Dan Brown)
The Deep (Peter Benchley)
Deliverance (James Dickey)
Farewell, My Lovely (Raymond Chandler)
First Blood (David Morell)
Foucault’s Pendulum (Umberto Eco)
Gerald’s Game (Stephen King)
The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon (Stephen King)
The Good Guy (Dean Koontz)
The Good Husband (Dean Koontz)
The Hunt for Red October (Tom Clancy)
The Ice Limit (Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child)
Intensity (Dean Koontz)
Jaws (Peter Benchley)
Misery (Stephen King)
The Name of the Rose (Umberto Eco)
Patriot Games (Tom Clancy)
Red Dragon (Thomas Harris)
Riptide (Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child)
The Silence of the Lambs (Thomas Harris)
The Spy Who Came in from the Cold (John le Carré)
The Spy Who Loved Me (Ian Fleming)
Sole Survivor (Dean Koontz)
Subterranean (James Rollins)
The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (Morton Freedgood, writing as John Godey)
Thunderball (Ian Fleming)
Ticktock (Dean Koontz)

Appendix 4: Bestselling Pseudo-Scientific “Non-Fiction”

Accounts of (Alleged) Conspiracies

In a chapter of Voodoo Histories: The Role of the Conspiracy Theory in Shaping Modern History, David Aaronovitch identifies the authors and works of pseudo-intellectuals who have published bestselling books--sometimes whole series of bestselling books--in which they document (after a fashion) what they claim are actual conspiracies. I offer summaries of these books as a means of suggesting how you could develop similar, but original, more fully developed conspiracy theories as the bases for the plots of your thrillers.

Aaronovitch cites the following authors and books as examples of the work of “pseudo-scholars”:

Worlds in Collision by Immanuel Velikovsky
Chariots of the Gods? Unsolved Mysteries of the Past and
Return of the Gods: Evidence of Extraterrestrial Visitations by Erich von Daniken (who, according to Aaronovitch, also wrote “twenty-six” other volumes on the same subject, “paleo-contact” between early human societies and extraterrestrial visitors, which, worldwide, have “sold sixty-three million copies”)

The Sign and the Seal: Quest for the Lost Ark of the Covenant and Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock

The Passover Plot by Hugh J. Schonfield

The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, and Henry Lincoln

Worlds in Collision: Published in 1950, Velikovsky’s book is the granddaddy of its ilk. Among the first of its kind, the text offers an abundance of footnoted source material to bolster its incredible claims that the eruption of Venus from Jupiter and the expelled planet’s resulting close passage to Earth altered both Earth’s orbit and its axis, causing the earthshaking catastrophes mentioned in the Bible and the mythologies of ancient Chinese, Indian, and Mediterranean nations. Scientists’ immediate and continued rejection of Velikovsky’s thesis did nothing to slow its sales.

Chariots of the Gods?: This 1968 book contends that ancient astronauts from other planets, perceived by primitive humans, gave technological marvels and religious creeds to their worshipers, leading to the founding of civilization. Von Daniken seeks to back up his claims by pointing to artifacts and structures that seem too sophisticated to have been built by the human hands of the day, including the Egyptian pyramids, Stonehenge, Easter Island’s Moai, Peru’s Nazca lines, and the Peri Reis map; passages from the Bible that seem to describe human contact with aliens, such as Ezekiel’s reference to cherubim, Moses’ receipt of instructions from God as to how to design and construct the Ark of the Covenant, and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah; and bits and pieces of lore from comparative mythology which are supposed to verify the idea that the aliens’ influence upon ancient humanity was global, not merely local. Scientific reactions to Chariots of the Gods? were more than skeptical; they were incredulous, and many took pains to debunk the half-baked theories that the book’s author presented, some accusing von Daniken of having plagiarized from Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier’s 1960 book, The Morning of the Magicians. This criticism, however, did not prevent von Daniken from publishing Return of the Gods and a number of other bestselling sequels.

Return of the Gods: Evidence of Extraterrestrial Visitations: Published in 1997, this book argues that religion--and, indeed, history itself--needs to be reinterpreted in light of the theory, presented by von Daniken himself, that the Earth has been repeatedly visited by extraterrestrials who have taken an interest in the progress of human civilization and who continue to monitor and visit the human species. Von Daniken reveals the truth behind the Biblical accounts of the angels of God’s eviction of Lucifer from heaven and of the origin of the nephilim (the giant offspring of alien-human interbreeding) and explains, among other things, where the gods of India originated (outer space). Other books in von Daniken’s series include Gods from Outer Space (1970), The Gold of the Gods (1972), In Search of Ancient Gods (1973), Miracles of the Gods (1974), and--well, you get the picture.

The Sign and the Seal: Quest for the Lost Ark of the Covenant: Supposedly based upon divine revelation, this 1992 book, supposedly traces the circuitous route of the Biblical ark of the covenant from its Egyptian origins, to Jerusalem, and back to Africa. Full of references to secret codes, lost treasures, “White Knights,” mazes, ghosts, and devils, the book’s contents virtually guarantee its success.

Fingerprints of the Gods: This 1995 book bills itself as revealing “the true origins of civilization“ by its “connecting [of] puzzling clues scattered throughout the world,” so that its author provides “compelling evidence of a technologically and culturally advanced civilization that was destroyed and obliterated from human memory”; its table of contents offers further clues as to its appeal to the masses; the text describes “a map of hidden places,” refers to “a Lost Science,” alludes to

“The Inca Trail to the Past,” to the existence of giants, to the apocalypse, to the worship of serpents, to a fall of “Black Rain,” and to enough other antiquities and mysteries--or mysteries of antiquity--to whet most readers’ appetites.

The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail: Many of the authors’ ideas are offensive and even blasphemous to Christians. This book, published in 1982, claims that Jesus did not survive his crucifixion; that he had one or more children by Mary Magdalene; that, after his death, she spirited their offspring off to live, first among a Jewish sect and then among the Merovingians, a family of European royals; that, after the Merovingians are driven out by the Carolingians, Mary and her child or children are accepted, after a time in hiding, by the House of Lorraine; that the Priory of Sion, a secret group once associated with the Knights Templar, remain bearers of these secrets and the responsibility of preserving the divine bloodline; that clues concerning the whole state of affairs are discernable in certain works of art; and that the Catholic Church is also privy to the survival of Jesus’ seed (and allows itself to be blackmailed by a priest who decodes a parchment that tells the tale. If this plot, which is supposed to be actual history, sounds familiar, it should: Dan Brown was sued for plagiarizing it (unsuccessfully, as it turns out) in writing his novel, The Da Vinci Code (2003). This book is a good example of the faux-scholarship of which Aaronovitch writes, for, as Aaronovitch points out, “the 1996 edition” of the book is buttressed by “thirty-six pages of footnotes, a thirteen-page bibliography detailing works in English, French, and German, and twenty-four pages of photographs” which provide a sense of “popular scholarship” (201).

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Generating Horror Plots, Part II

Copyright 2008 by Gary L. Pullman

A careful analysis of the storylines of motion pictures, novels, narrative poems, and short stories in the horror genre discloses recurring plot motifs, or formulae. Here are the first three of a baker’s dozen (plus one) of them, each of which is complete with one or more examples to get you started on the compilation and maintenance of your own list of such plot patterns.

1. Find the ugly within or among the beautiful. We discussed this strategy in a previous post.

2. Develop a continuing theme. We discussed this strategy in a previous post.

3. Enact revenge. We discussed this strategy in a previous post.



4. Rescue a damsel in distress. Perhaps Dean Koontz uses this technique for generating horror plots more than any of his contemporaries, especially in his more recent novels, including The Husband and The Good Guy. In Koontz’s universe, a woman can seldom protect and defend herself, or even find her way through life, without relying upon a strong, competent, able-bodied, and taciturn man. The women’s ineptitude in this regard often cause rather improbable plots on Koontz’s part. Nevertheless, his stories tend to be suspenseful, fun reads. In The Husband, Mitch Rafferty, a gardener, receives a telephone call from his wife’s kidnapper. He tells Mitch to watch a man who is walking his dog across the street. The man is shot and killed on the kidnapper’s orders, demonstrating that he is dead serious about killing Mitch’s wife, Holly, if Mitch tips off the police or fails to provide the hefty ransom that the abductor demands--one which is way beyond Mitch’s financial scope. Fortunately, as it turns out, Mitch’s brother is wealthy, but, of course, the plot twists and turns to the point that the reader wonders whether Mitch will ever rescue Holly or even manage to stay alive himself. The Good Guy’s storyline is similar. This time, the blue-collar worker is Tim Carrier, a stone mason. He’s having a drink at a local bar when a man arrives and, mistaking him for the hit man he’s hired to kill a woman, hands him his $10,000 fee and a photograph of the intended target, Linda Paquette, a Laguna Beach writer (like Koontz himself). Minutes later, the hit man, Krait, enters the bar, mistaking Tim for his client. Tim hands him the money he’s just received, telling Krait that he’s changed his mind about having Paquette killed. Then, he finds the intended target, and he and Paquette flee, the killer on their trail. Fortunately, Tim’s past has well prepared him to be Paquette’s protector, for Krait is an able and relentless, conscienceless killer. Koontz’s modern knights in white armor will uphold the tradition of chivalry, no matter how dead it may be in the everyday world in which the rest of us have to live.

5. Find the strange in the familiar. Two specimens of this approach may be offered, one as much a failure as the other is a success. Although we have discussed them previously, we offer a truncated version of our previous discussions here to demonstrate the technique of finding the strange in the familiar. The failure is the film, The Happening (2008), which was directed by M. Night Shyamalan. As most horror stories of this kind begin, the movie starts by showing a series of bizarre, seemingly inexplicable occurrences: mass suicides and murders by individuals and groups whose behavior is markedly aberrant. As the series of such incidents continue, spreading from person to person, from group to group, and from town to town, various theories are considered and abandoned as to the cause of the strange happenings. Is a bio-terrorist attack behind the events? Is it an epidemic of some kind? A botanist thinks that plants may be responsible for the murder and mayhem, releasing airborne toxins to defend themselves against humanity. The protagonist, a scientist named Elliot Moore, and his wife Alma take refuge with an murdered friend and colleague’s orphaned daughter Hess inside an eccentric old woman’s house as the plants continue to press their attack. Their hostess becomes infected, but they escape her attempts to kill them and, later, leave the house, surprised to find that the attacks have ceased. Three months later, watching TV, Elliot, Alma, and their adopted daughter hear a newscaster warn that the mysterious happening might have been but “the first spot of a rash” to come. Alma discovers she is pregnant, and, as she and Elliot celebrate, another series of bizarre suicides and murders take place in France. The film seeks to find the strange in the familiar, seeing flowers and shrubs and trees, especially those which blow in high winds, to be as menacing as poisonous weeds, but it is difficult to fear vegetation, wind or no wind, and the suspense simply doesn’t build, despite the mad and dangerous behavior of the infected humans whom the plants are bent upon exterminating. The heavy-handed, moralistic environmentalist theme of the movie is about as profound in its delivery as a PETA ad. The plot suffers in other ways, as does the characterization of all the players, but these are matters outside the present concern. A story that is more successful in eliciting the strange within the familiar is Bram Stoker’s short story “Dracula’s Guest.” Stoker suggests, far more subtly and effectively than Shyamalan, that there may be prodigious unseen powers operating behind the scenes, so to speak, of the natural events that take place in a remote stretch of forested countryside outside Munich on Walpurgis Night. Stoker he suggests that a tall, thin man who’d appeared seemingly out of nowhere and vanished as abruptly after frightening the coachman’s horses and leaving the Englishman stranded in the countryside as twilight gathers toward Walpurgis Night may be the unseen watcher, and perhaps also the occult, supernatural force that seems to control such natural forces as the weather, the wolves, the effects of the blizzard, and the hail. Alternatively, a note to Herr Delbruck by Dracula suggests that Transylvanian count himself may be opposed to whatever supernatural force is controlling these forces of nature and that, as this power’s adversary, he is acting, for reasons of his own, as the Englishman’s protector, however short-lived this self-assigned role may turn out to be. Examples of other stories that are more or less successful in seeking the strange within the familiar are Stephen King’s From a Buick 8 and most of the stories by H. P. Lovecraft. Concerning the finding of the strange in the familiar, the reader is advised to peruse the several articles that we have posted previously on Thrillers and Chillers, under the heading “Everyday Horrors.”



6. Bring up the past (and relate it to the present). The past is prologue to the present. Stephen King employs this technique in It, in which an ancient evil makes a reappearance in Derry, Maine, every 27 years. In its last previous appearance, it was defeated by the Losers Club, who reunite as adults to take it on when it makes its next appearance in town. In Summer of Night, a novel that is similar in both plot and theme to King’s It, Dan Simmons’ ancient evil, associated with the House of Borgia, seeks to establish itself in the small town of Elm Haven, Illinois, but it encounters the determined resistance of five pre-teen boys and a street-smart girl from the wrong side of the tracks. Bentley Little also employs the technique of bringing up the past and relating it as prologue to present catastrophes on several of his novels, including The Resort, in which a former nightmarish resort, although razed long ago, somehow determines the fate of a present, nearby resort and what befalls its staff and guests. A movie that takes this tack is Poltergeist, wherein, because a housing development has been built upon an Indian burial ground, there is hell to pay.

Stay tuned: We will explore additional horror plot staples in subsequent posts.

Friday, December 26, 2008

Generating Horror Plots, Part 1

Copyright 2008 by Gary L. Pullman


A careful analysis of the storylines of motion pictures, novels, narrative poems, and short stories in the horror genre discloses recurring plot motifs, or formulae. Here are the first three of a baker’s dozen (plus one) of them, each of which is complete with one or more examples to get you started on the compilation and maintenance of your own list of such plot patterns.

1. Find the ugly within or among the beautiful. We can thank Edgar Allan Poe for this one. The narrator of his short story “Berenice” asks, “How is it that from beauty I have derived a type of unloveliness?” In most beautiful persons, places, and things, there is the potential for hidden ugliness. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s short stories “The Birthmark” and “Rappaccini’s Daughter” are examples, as is Oscar Wilde’s novel, The Picture of Dorian Gray. In “The Birthmark,” Georgiana is an exquisitely beautiful young woman with but one defect. She has an unsightly birthmark that prevents her husband, a scientist named Aylmer, from viewing her as physically perfect. He becomes obsessed with this blemish, and Georgiana comes to share her husband’s fixation. Together, assisted by Aminadab, Aylmer’s aide, the couple seeks to remove the birthmark, but, when they succeed, Georgiana dies. The ugliness, of course, is not in the birthmark, but in Aylmer’s attitude and superficiality. In “Rappacinni’s Daughter,” a scientist, conducting a secret experiment with exotic poisonous plants, keeps his daughter, as a research subject, locked inside the garden that doubles as his laboratory. A medical student, Giovanni, falls in love with Beatrice, visiting her in the garden, whereupon he falls victim to plants’ poison--and to the now-poisonous Beatrice as well. In The Picture of Dorian Gray, the oil portrait of the title character ages and becomes uglier and uglier, suffering the consequences of his sins while Gray himself remains youthful and healthy, right up to the moment that he plunges a knife into his likeness and dies, a withered and grotesque old man.

2. Develop a continuing theme. Again, Poe exemplifies the process. In “The Philosophy of Composition,” he argues that the death of a beautiful young woman is the most poetic topic in the world, and this theme is the basis for not only his poems The Raven and “Anabelle Lee,” but also such of his stories as “The Oval Portrait” and “Berenice.” Since we have discussed both The Raven and “The Oval Portrait” in previous posts, we will restrict our current consideration of Poe’s works to “Anabelle Lee” and “Berenice.” “Anabelle Lee” recounts the suspicions of the narrator that angels killed his beloved Anabelle because they were jealousy of her surpassing beauty. Nevertheless, he believes that their love for one another transcends time and space and that, once he is dead, he shall be reunited with her for eternity. Meanwhile, he sleeps beside her tomb by the sea each night, where, in the stars, he imagines he sees her loving gaze. In “Berenice,” Egaeus, planning to wed his cousin, becomes obsessed with the beauty of her teeth. Berenice’s health fails, and, after she dies, Egaeus’ servant brings him the horrible news that Berenice’s grave has been violated. Covered in blood, and with dental instruments beside him, Egaeus realizes that, in a somnambulistic-like state, has robbed his beloved’s grave and extracted the teeth from her corpse. (The fact that Berenice may have suffered from catalepsy and may, therefore, have been mistakenly buried alive, adds to the horror of the story.)


3. Enact revenge. Poe, once again, exemplifies this approach in “The Cask of Amontillado,” and Stephen King’s novel, Carrie, also demonstrates how the theme of vengeance can advance a horror story’s plot. In Poe’s story, Montresor, believing that his guest, a wine expert named Fortunato, has insulted him, lures Fortunato into Montresor’s wine cellar, on the pretext that he wishes Fortunato to evaluate a cask of Amontillado wine Montresor has purchased recently. Instead, after getting Fortunato drunk by pausing to have him sample various other wines along the way, Montresor walls his guest up, alive, behind bricks he lays while Fortunato is chained to a wall, leaving him to die. King’s Carrie White has telekinetic powers, which she uses to avenge herself against her cruel classmates and her insane mother, whose religious fanaticism has been a vehicle of psychological abuse for years, leaving Carrie ill prepared to deal with such matters as adolescence, sex, and the society of her peers. Of course, many other horror stories also employ the revenge motif. It is one of the staples of horror plots, both past and present, and, it seems safe to predict, it will continue to remain such in the future.


In subsequent posts, we will consider some of the other techniques by which horror writers develop storylines.

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Making a Scene

copyright 2008 by Gary L. Pullman

The scene is the building block of the short story, the novel, or the screenplay. It features one or more characters; a conflict; dialogue, interior monologue, stream of consciousness, or some other representation of the character’s or characters’ thoughts and feelings; and, like the full-fledged story of which it is a part, a scene has a beginning, a middle, and an end that is developed climactically; and the scene advances a larger, specific purpose, such as developing the narrative’s overall plot, introducing an important character, intensifying suspense, complicating the story’s basic conflict, introducing or developing a related subplot, characterizing an important character, delineating the setting, and so forth.

In horror stories, whether in print or on film, the scene also usually (but not always) communicates something terrifying, horrific, or repulsive. What Edgar Allan Poe advises, in “The Philosophy of Composition,” concerning the short story (or narrative poem) as a whole applies also to the scene: it must be carefully plotted, with the single, unifying effect that is to be created in mind from the start, and everything in the scene should lead to the development of this effect. In short, one must know one’s purpose in writing the scene--what he or she means to accomplish by it--before putting pen to paper or fingertips to keyboard. One must remember to connect one scene with the next through a series of cause-and-effect relationships. One scene, in other words, must logically lead to the next, and it, in turn, must lead to the one after it, and so forth, throughout the story. There mist be a reason, or purpose, for each scene. Otherwise, irrelevancies and confusion will be introduced into what, otherwise, might have been a meaningful and intelligible, perhaps even gripping, story.

In fact, whether the writer also happens to be an illustrator or not, he or she can make some rough pictures, similar to the sketches that make up a film’s storyboard, to indicate the scene’s basic purpose, structure, and Storyboards: What Are They? offers tips for storyboard construction that could aid writers in developing story scenes. The website’s article reduces the process to six steps:
  1. Think of your story as a video.
  2. In your first frame show an overview of your primary setting. Let the setting help communicate the point you want to get across or the mood you want to set.
  3. Make frames that show the 5 W’s. [These elements are identified as the scene’s “who,” “what,” “when,” “where,” and “why” elements.]
  4. Identify the characters. [These characters are identified as the protagonist and the antagonist.]
  5. Plot. [Specify the problem, the climax, and the resolution, or the means by which the “problem is solved--which can lead directly to your message.”]
  6. Message. [This is the “moral, perspective on life or observation about life,” the theme, that the scene is intended to convey.]
Here is an example of Saul Bass’ storyboarding of the famous shower scene in Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho:


Although it is not a horror story, the original Karate Kid movie offers a good model of the construction and use of scenes, as does It’s a Wonderful Life, My Fair Lady, The Wizard of Oz, and The Sound of Music, to name but a few of many well-made stories.

In horror, Poe is a superb storyteller. Each of his scenes is deliberate and purposeful and leads plausibly to the next. Other master craftsmen and artists who are especially adept at the construction and sequencing of horror story scenes include Alfred Hitchcock, Ridley Scott, Stephen King, Dean Koontz, Wes Craven, Christian Nyby, H. P. Lovecraft, H. G. Wells, Mary Shelley, Shirley Jackson, Bram Stoker, H. P. Lovecraft, and Ray Bradbury. By studying how they create and use scenes, others may benefit, improving their own fiction by dissecting the work of the accomplished others who have gone before them.

Saturday, December 20, 2008

"Christabel": The Prototypical Lesbian Vampire, Part II

Copyright 2008 by Gary L. Pullman


As we saw in a previous post, the first part of Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s narrative poem Christabel ends with the protagonist imperiled by the strange, abducted woman, Geraldine, whom Christabel met while at prayer in the woods near her father’s castle and invited to share her bedroom--and then her bed--for the night, after being seduced by her houseguest’s beauty and spellbound by her magic breasts.

In Part II of the poem, as the castle’s bell rings to announce the dawn, Geraldine awakens and dresses before awakening Christabel. Although she seems a bit confused, it seems to Christabel that she has “sinned” somehow. Her confusion may be the result of her sleep, but it also seems, as does her forgetfulness of how, exactly, she has “sinned,” that she is also perplexed as a result of the spell that Geraldine has cast upon her. Christabel is still under the influence of her houseguest’s enchantment. The women visit Sir Leoline’s bedchamber, wherein the baron has himself just awakened. Geraldine has assumed the form and appearance of the daughter of a neighboring nobleman, a former friend and present foe of Sir Leoline named Lord Roland de Vaux of Tryermaine. When Sir Leoline hears how Geraldine was abducted, he determines to avenge Geraldine’s honor by sponsoring a tournament at which he may “dislodge” the “reptile souls” of her abductors “from the bodies and forms of men” which they have adopted. As her father embraces Geraldine, Christabel has a momentary, highly disturbing vision of Geraldine’s true form and nature:
And fondly in his arms he took
Fair Geraldine, who met the embrace,
Prolonging it with joyous look.
Which when she viewed, a vision fell
Upon the soul of Christabel,
The vision of fear, the touch and pain!
She shrunk and shuddered, and saw again--
(Ah, woe is me! Was it for thee,
Thou gentle maid! such sights to see?)
Again she saw that bosom old,
Again she felt that bosom cold. . . .
However, Christabel comes at once back under Geraldine’s spell, and Sir Leoline sends his bard, Bracy, to fetch Lord Roland, to retrieve his daughter (i. e., Geraldine, who impersonates the girl), promising to meet him upon his way. He regrets that he and Roland are no longer friends, repenting “of the day/When” he “spake words of fierce disdain/To Roland de Vaux of Tryermaine.” Bracy begs Sir Leoline not to do so, however, advising him of a dream he’s had in which Christabel, in the form of a dove, is being squeezed to death by a green snake at the base of a tree in the forest near the baron’s castle. Again, the poem’s narrator calls upon Jesus and Mary to protect and defend Christabel, implying that the young woman is in spiritual danger. However, Sir Leoline, having fallen under Geraldine’s spell, as has his daughter, says that he and Sir Roland will crush any such serpent, at which point the narrator describes Geraldine as a lamia, or serpent-woman:
A snake's small eye blinks dull and shy;
And the lady's eyes they shrunk in her head,
Each shrunk up to a serpent’s eye,
And with somewhat of malice, and more of dread,
At Christabel she looked askance!--
One moment--and the sight was fled!
In case the reader, being, perhaps, a little slow, has missed the previous implications, Coleridge makes it clear that Geraldine is the very serpent (or serpent-woman) of which Bracy dreamed. It is she who threatens the imperiled Christabel.

When Geraldine’s spell begins to lose its force upon Christabel, she, recalling the true appearance and nature of the lamia, bids her father to send Geradline away at once. However, the baron, still under Geraldine’s sway, is ashamed at his daughter’s inhospitable attitude and sends Bracy upon his way, ad Christabel quickly comes again under Geraldine’s enchantment.
Here, the poem (another of Coleridge’s “fragments”) ends, although, as we saw in the previous post concerning this work, the poet is alleged to have intended to finish it according to this storyline, identified by Coleridge’s biographer, James Gilman:
Over the mountains, the Bard, as directed by Sir Leoline, hastes with his disciple; but in consequence of one of those inundations supposed to be common to this country, the spot only where the castle once stood is discovered--the edifice itself being washed away. He determines to return. Geraldine, being acquainted with all that is passing, like the weird sisters in Macbeth, vanishes. Reappearing, however, she awaits the return of the Bard, exciting in the meantime, by her wily arts, all the anger she could rouse in the Baron's breast, as well as that jealousy of which he is described to have been susceptible. The old Bard and the youth at length arrive, and therefore she can no longer personate the character of Geraldine, the daughter of Lord Roland de Vaux, but changes her appearance to that of the accepted, though absent, lover of Christabel. Now ensues a courtship most distressing to Christabel, who feels--she knows not why--great disgust for her once favored knight.

This coldness is very painful to the Baron, who has no more conception than herself of the supernatural transformation. She at last yields to her father's entreaties, and consents to approach the altar with the hated suitor. The real lover, returning, enters at this moment, and produces the ring which she had once given him in sign of her. . . [betrothal]. Thus defeated, the supernatural being Geraldine disappears. As predicted, the castle bell tolls, the mother's voice is heard, and, to the exceeding great joy of the parties, the rightful marriage takes place, after which follows a reconciliation and explanation between father and daughter.
Since Coleridge never ended the poem, it’s not possible to say how he would have developed its overall theme, but, of course, the idea that the Christabel’s true love is a knight whose arrival in the proverbial nick of time brings the lesbian lamia’s plans to wed Christabel to naught is fraught with difficulties, to say the least, and seems to support the patriarchal and heterosexual status quo, as horror typically does, both identifying the matriarchal and homosexual threats that Geraldine represents with the monstrous Other which is to be vanquished so that normal order may prevail and all may, once more, be right with the world. In this regard, as in equating lesbians to female vampires, Coleridge’s poem also sets the tone for many movies that take up this motif.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

"Christabel": The Prototypical Lesbian Vampire


She’s sweet and chaste and pure and innocent and sexy and girl-next-door and religious and probably blonde, and she’s named Christabel. She’s the victim.

Her dark half and lover is mysterious and sexually experienced and seductive and exotic and blasphemous and probably brunette, and she’s named Geraldine. She’s the prototypical lesbian vampire.

Reveler upon opium when he was not writing poetry or literary criticism (or dodging bill collectors), poor, but brilliant, Samuel Taylor Coleridge wrote, among other eerie poems, such as The Rime of the Ancient Mariner and “Kubla Khan,” a narrative ditty about a lesbian vampire named Christabel. It has gotten relatively short shrift among publishers and is not as well known among the general public as other of the poet’s works. If one has encountered the poem at all, it was most likely during a class concerning poetry or English literature. It is a disturbing poem, and, since it involves a good deal of horror, terror, revulsion, and abnormality, it is a good subject for study by horror writers, professional and aspiring.

While praying beside an oak tree in the wee hours of the morning, Christabel encounters a strange stranger named Geraldine, who says men have abducted her from her home. Enchanted by Geraldine’s seductive beauty, Christabel, perhaps knowing a good thing when she sees it (she may even regard Geraldine as a response to her prayer), takes the stranger home with her, whereupon Christabel’s father, Sir Leoline, a baron, becoming infatuated with Geraldine, orders a celebratory parade to declare her rescue. Here, the poem (another of Cole ridge’s “fragments”) ends, although the poet is alleged to have intended to finish it according to this storyline, identified by Coleridge’s biographer, James Gilman:

Over the mountains, the Bard, as directed by Sir Leoline, hastes with his disciple; but in consequence of one of those inundations supposed to be common to this country, the spot only where the castle once stood is discovered--the edifice itself being washed away. He determines to return. Geraldine, being acquainted with all that is passing, like the weird sisters in Macbeth, vanishes. Reappearing, however, she awaits the return of the Bard, exciting in the meantime, by her wily arts, all the anger she could rouse in the Baron's breast, as well as that jealousy of which he is described to have been susceptible. The old Bard and the youth at length arrive, and therefore she can no longer personate the character of Geraldine, the daughter of Lord Roland de Vaux, but changes her appearance to that of the accepted, though absent, lover of Christabel. Now ensues a courtship most distressing to Christabel, who feels--she knows not why--great disgust for her once favored knight.

This coldness is very painful to the Baron, who has no more conception than herself of the supernatural transformation. She at last yields to her father's entreaties, and consents to approach the altar with the hated suitor. The real lover, returning, enters at this moment, and produces the ring which she had once given him in sign of her. . . [betrothal]. Thus defeated, the supernatural being Geraldine disappears. As predicted, the castle bell tolls, the mother's voice is heard, and, to the exceeding great joy of the parties, the rightful marriage takes place, after which follows a reconciliation and explanation between father and daughter.

The verse is almost adolescent, or, as critics prefer to say, when addressing the work of a member of the literary canon, childlike:

‘Tis the middle of night by the castle clock,
And the owls have awakened the crowing cock;
Tu--whit!-- Tu--whoo!
And hark, again! the crowing cock,
How drowsily it crew.

Sir Leoline, the Baron rich,
Hath a toothless mastiff bitch;
From her kennel beneath the rock
She maketh answer to the clock,
Four for the quarters, and twelve for the hour;
Ever and aye, by shine and shower,
Sixteen short howls, not over loud;
Some say, she sees my lady's shroud.
Is the night chilly and dark?
The night is chilly, but not dark.
The thin gray cloud is spread on high,
It covers but not hides the sky.

Coleridge not-so-subtly plants some clues that Geraldine may be as monstrous as she is beautiful, for she refuses to thank the Virgin Mary for her rescue:

So free from danger, free from fear,
They crossed the court : right glad they were.
And Christabel devoutly cried
To the Lady by her side,
Praise we the Virgin all divine
Who hath rescued thee from thy distress!
Alas, alas! said Geraldine, I cannot speak for weariness.

Uh oh!

The fire likes her, too; it leaps in her presence, to show the reader, again, that there’s something odd about Geraldine:

They passed the hall, that echoes still,
Pass as lightly as you will!
The brands were flat, the brands were dying,
Amid their own white ashes lying;
But when the lady passed, there came
A tongue of light, a fit of flame;
And Christabel saw the lady's eye,
And nothing else saw she thereby. . . .

Smitten by her seductress, mesmerizing houseguest, Christabel assures Geraldine that Christabel’s father sleeps: “O softly tread, said Christabel,/ My father seldom sleepeth well.” Is Christabel’s caution a concern for her father’s rest or an invitation of sexual dalliance with Geraldine? Their destination, and they stealthy way in which they approach it, suggests that Christabel may not be as innocent and virtuous as she appears to be, for she leads her houseguest, with the utmost caution, to her bedroom, where she offers her a glass of wine that Christabel’s now-deceased mother (and, presently, her “guardian spirit”) made from wildflowers:

Sweet Christabel her feet doth bare,
And jealous of the listening air
They steal their way from stair to stair,
Now in glimmer, and now in gloom,
And now they pass the Baron's room,
As still as death, with stifled breath!
And now have reached her chamber door;
And now doth Geraldine press down
The rushes of the chamber floor. . . .

. . . O weary lady, Geraldine,
I pray you, drink this cordial wine!
It is a wine of virtuous powers;
My mother made it of wildflowers.

The next moment, her name having been mentioned, the spirit of Christabel’s mother appears, but only Geraldine can see the phantom, and she orders the ghost to leave.

O mother dear! that thou wert here!
I would, said Geraldine, she were!

But soon with altered voice, said she--
`Off, wandering mother! Peak and pine!
I have power to bid thee flee.'
Alas! what ails poor Geraldine?
Why stares she with unsettled eye?
Can she the bodiless dead espy?
And why with hollow voice cries she,
`Off, woman, off! this hour is mine--
Though thou her guardian spirit be,
Off, woman. off! 'tis given to me.'

Invoking her authority to be alone with Christabel, Geraldine enforces her right, not wanting to be bothered by her enchanted hostess’ mother’s spirit hanging about like a spectral chaperone. Once the ghost has departed, Geraldine wastes no time in further seducing Christabel. She instructs Christabel to “unrobe” herself and to get into bed. Christabel does as she’s directed, obviously still under Geraldine’s spell. Unable to sleep, she studies Geraldine’s beautiful face and form, and the young hostess’ voyeurism is rewarded by a glimpse of Geraldine’s breast, which elicits a cry from the poem’s narrator for divine protection for Christabel:

But now unrobe yourself; for I
Must pray, ere yet in bed I lie.'

Quoth Christabel, So let it be!
And as the lady bade, did she.
Her gentle limbs did she undress
And lay down in her loveliness.

But through her brain of weal and woe
So many thoughts moved to and fro,
That vain it were her lids to close;
So half-way from the bed she rose,
And on her elbow did recline
To look at the lady Geraldine.

Beneath the lamp the lady bowed,
And slowly rolled her eyes around;
Then drawing in her breath aloud,
Like one that shuddered, she unbound
The cincture from beneath her breast:
Her silken robe, and inner vest,
Dropt to her feet, and full in view,
Behold! her bosom, and half her side--
A sight to dream of, not to tell!
O shield her! shield sweet Christabel!

Her charms having worked their magic, Geraldine, after a moment’s confused hesitation (probably included to make the meter work), gets into bed with Christabel, wherein they stretch out alongside one another, lay in one another’s arms, and, presumably, experience greater intimacies than those that a mere embrace may provide:

Yet Geraldine nor speaks nor stirs;
Ah! what a stricken look was hers!
Deep from within she seems half-way
To lift some weight with sick assay,
And eyes the maid and seeks delay;
Then suddenly as one defied
Collects herself in scorn and pride,
And lay down by the Maiden's side!--
And in her arms the maid she took. . . .!

At last, the mesmerizing Geraldine explains the magic of her enchanted “bosom” to her victim:

And with low voice and doleful look
These words did say :
`In the touch of this bosom there worketh a spell,
Which is lord of thy utterance, Christabel!

So ends the first part of the poem, in which the princess Christabel, having befriended a strange, abducted woman, Geraldine, whom she’d met while she’d been praying in the woods near her father’s castle, shelters her for the night, only to be seduced by her houseguest’s beauty and to be spellbound by her magic breasts.

Despite the adolescent versification and the clumsy plot, the poem does have a certain seductive and mesmerizing effect upon the reader, drawing him or her into the magic of Geraldine’s enchanted “bosom” and suggesting that the poor, chaste Christabel, despite the narrator’s continued pleas for her protection, is, both sexually and otherwise, her houseguest’s victim:

It was a lovely sight to see
The lady Christabel, when she
Was praying at the old oak tree.
Amid the jaggéd shadows
Of mossy leafless boughs,
Kneeling in the moonlight,
To make her gentle vows.

Her slender palms together prest,
Heaving sometimes on her breast;
Her face resigned to bliss or bale--
Her face, oh call it fair not pale,
And both blue eyes more bright than clear.
Each about to have a tear.:

With open eyes (ah, woe is me!)
Asleep, and dreaming fearfully,
Fearfully dreaming, yet, I wis,
Dreaming that alone, which is--
O sorrow and shame! Can this be she,
The lady, who knelt at the old oak tree?
And lo! the worker of these harms,
That holds the maiden in her arms,
Seems to slumber still and mild,
As a mother with her child.

A star hath set, a star hath risen,
O Geraldine! since arms of thine
Have been the lovely lady's prison.
O Geraldine! one hour was thine--
Thou'st had thy will! By tairn and rill,
The night-birds all that hour were still.
But now they are jubilant anew,
From cliff and tower, tu--whoo! tu--whoo!
Tu--whoo! tu--whoo! from wood and fell!

And see! the lady Christabel
Gathers herself from out her trance;
Her limbs relax, her countenance
Grows sad and soft; the smooth thin lids
Close o'er her eyes; and tears she sheds--
Large tears that leave the lashes bright!
And oft the while she seems to smile
As infants at a sudden light!

Yea, she doth smile, and she doth weep,
Like a youthful hermitess,
Beauteous in a wilderness,
Who, praying always, prays in sleep.
And, if she move unquietly,
Perchance, 'tis but the blood so free
Comes back and tingles in her feet.
No doubt, she hath a vision sweet.
What if her guardian spirit 'twere,
What if she knew her mother near?
But this she knows, in joys and woes,
That saints will aid if men will call :
For the blue sky bends over all!.

No wonder lesbian and feminist critics regard this fragmented poem as one of the great ones of world lit.

The lesbian vampire has since become a staple of erotic horror, appearing in many legitimate, if “R”-rated, films, including:

Eternal (2004): Detective Raymond Pope’s search for his missing wife leads him to the estate of a wealthy woman, Elizabeth Kane, who may be the latest incarnation of Countess Elizabeth Bathory, the vampire who bathed in virgins’ blood.

Lost for a Vampire (1971): A writer researching a book visits an all-girls’ boarding school inhabited by lesbian vampire students.

Vampyros Lesbos (1971): In Turkey, American lawyer Linda Westinghouse’s dreams about being harassed and seduced by a dark-haired lesbian vampire beauty come true.

Les Frissons des Vampires (1970): Honeymooning couples are victimized by a castle of lesbian vampires.

Vampyres (1974): A lesbian couple lures innocent passersby to their deaths, one of the seductresses finally falling prey to a woman she seduces.

The Velvet Vampire (1971): A vampire woman comes out of the desert to seduce a hippie couple.

The Vampire Lovers (1970): The first of a trilogy of films about lesbian vampires, this one recreates, more or less faithfully, Sheridan LeFanu’s novel, Camilla. The lesbian is rival against a man for the affections of a woman whom both desire. He wins.

Blood and Roses (1960): A dead vampire’s spirit lives again by possessing Camilla, who narrates the tale.

Daughters of Darkness (1971): A honeymooning couple encounters Countess Elizabeth Bathory, who seduces the bride.

The Hunger (1983): Miriam Blaylock seduces scientist Sarah Roberts.

One into which it was harder for some critics to sink their teeth into is Lesbian Vampire Killers (to be released in 2009), a comedy in which men seek to rescue their women from a gang of lesbian vampires who have victimized a small Welsh town.

Saturday, December 13, 2008

Some Thoughts on Horror

If a man harbors any sort of fear, it makes him landlord to a ghost. -- Lloyd Douglas


Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Where there is no imagination, there is no horror. -- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Perfect order is the forerunner of perfect horror. -- Carlos Fuentes
Jennifer Love Hewitt

I'd never watch a horror film, but after I found out I was going to be in one, I watched, like, four of them, including The Shining. I was terrified--I couldn't sleep for days. But I wanted to get myself used to things I was going to see on the set. -- Jennifer Love Hewitt

Eric Hoffer

You can discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you. -- Eric Hoffer

There is a sacred horror about everything grand. It is easy to admire mediocrity and hills; but whatever is too lofty, a genius as well as a mountain, an assembly as well as a masterpiece, seen too near, is appalling. -- Victor Hugo

Terror. . . often arises from a pervasive sense of disestablishment: that things are in the unmaking. -- Stephen King

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

Music, even in situations of the greatest horror, should never be painful to the ear but should flatter and charm it, and thereby always remain music. -- Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

Acting is like a Halloween mask that you put on. -- River Phoenix

You gain strength, courage, and confidence by every experience by which you really stop to look fear in the face. You are able to say to yourself, ‘I lived through this horror. I can take the next thing that comes along.’ -- Eleanor Roosevelt

Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth--more than ruin, more even than death. -- Bertrand Russell

Civilization is hideously fragile [and] there's not much between us and the horrors underneath, just about a coat of varnish. -- C. P. Snow

He's not stupid; he's possessed by a retarded ghost. --Unknown

One might say that the true subject of the horror genre is the struggle for recognition of all that our civilization represses and oppresses. -- Robin Wood

Friday, December 12, 2008

Fallacious Horrors

copyright 2008 by Gary L. Pullman

According to The Skeptic’s Dictionary, an ad hoc hypothesis “is one created to explain facts that seem to refute one’s theory.” As an example of this hypothesis, the lexicographer of doubt states, “For example, ESP researchers have been known to blame the hostile thoughts of onlookers for unconsciously influencing pointer readings on sensitive instruments. The hostile vibes, they say, made it impossible for them to duplicate a positive ESP experiment.”
A nice bit of pseudo-logic, to be sure, but this one, reported in the same article, is even more unseemly and amusing:
Ad hoc hypotheses are common in defense of the pseudoscientific theory known as biorhythm theory. For example, there are very many people who do not fit the predicted patterns of biorhythm theory. Rather than accept this fact as refuting evidence of the theory, a new category of people is created: the arhythmic. In short, whenever the theory does not seem to work, the contrary evidence is systematically discounted.
The true believer, a stereotypical horror story character--one who believes in all manner of strange events for no other reason than that he wants to believe--often uses the ad hoc hypothesis in reverse. Instead of seeking to explain away facts that refute his theories, the true believer uses them to refute more commonly accepted (i. e., scientific) explanations for various phenomena and effects. For example, a scientific observer might argue that a person discovered his car keys in an unexpected place because he’d forgotten that he’d placed them in this location earlier in the day. The true believer would argue, instead, that the keys’ being found in an unexpected location proves that the house is haunted, for it was the ghosts who haunt the house who’d moved the keys to the new location.

Other examples of fallacious reasoning that can benefit writers of horror fiction include communal reinforcement, selective thinking, subjective validation, testimonial evidence (anecdotal evidence), and wishful thinking. The Skeptic’s Dictionary defines and exemplifies these and many other fallacies as well, but, of course, it is up to the writer of horror fiction to apply them to his or her--or to his or her characters’--thinking in the service of his or her storylines.

Another good source for skeptical wisdom is James Randi Educational Foundation’s An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult and Supernatural.

Monday, December 8, 2008

What’s So Scary About. . . .

copyright 2008 by Gary L. Pullman

Too often, writers write the way people too often speak: without thinking or, more specifically, without planning. They hope for inspiration as they put pen to paper or (more typically fingertips to keyboard). However, a bit of forethought could go a long way, in horror writing or in the writing of any other genre of fiction. By brainstorming as to what’s so scary about a potential or chosen setting, the horror writer is better able to capitalize upon features of the locale that are uniquely or especially eerie, frightening, or repulsive. Here are a few key settings for horror stories. The aspiring horror writer can add more of his or her own and update the list as new elements of the horrible and the terrible occur to him or her concerning such places.


Attic

It is seldom visited, and its contents, to some extent, are apt to be forgotten; therefore, the attic is more or less unfamiliar and may house dangers, such as bats, rats, spiders, rabid squirrels, or human intruders.

It is unlit or dimly lit and full of shadows in which dangers may lurk or be concealed.

Its contents may be old or unused and may, therefore, represent mementos of death.

It is not spacious, and it lacks headroom, making one feel trapped.

Depending upon the weather, it could be hot, humid, musty, or damp.

It could smell of mold decay (if the body of an animal that has died in the attic’s walls or elsewhere has begun to rot).

Because of the boxes, crates, and other containers it often contains, the attic features many potential hiding places from which one may be ambushed.

It may lack continuous flooring, which impedes movement and escape.

Its being little visited and kept locked suggests that the attic is a “forbidden” place.

It seems unnaturally quiet.

Noises, lights, and smells, in a closed or locked attic suggests that something is amiss (i. e., that the attic is occupied by an animal, a human intruder, or a ghost, perhaps).

The ladder or the narrow, steep flight of steps leading to the attic suggests the unusual character of the attic.

It is isolated from the rest of the house and, therefore, from the rest of the family.

Its floorboards and hinges may creak.

It is likely to be unfurnished, undecorated, and unadorned; it may be unfinished as well, suggesting a place that has been abandoned and lacks the typical comforts of home.

Note: Flowers in the Attic is set, in large part, in an attic.

Basement

Many of the eerie elements associated with an attic are also associated with a basement, making a basement scary for the same reasons that an attic may be frightening. In addition, these other eerie elements are often specifically associated with a basement:

The knowledge that, in descending a ladder or a flight of steps, one is going underground (where things are often buried) enhances the uneasiness one may feel
in entering a basement.

Its windows, if any, are apt to be small, perhaps mere vertical slits, which obscures one’s vision to the outside world and makes escape impossible.

It may contain a furnace, the fiery grate or interior of which, in the otherwise relative darkness, may appear eerie or even hellish.

Its cupboards, if any, may contain unusual odds and ends or “secrets” that are better left unknown.

Its walls may be stained or discolored or in disrepair.

Note: The movie The People Under the Stairs is set mostly in a family’s basement.

Crawlspace

Many of the eerie elements associated with an attic are also associated with a basement, making a basement scary for the same reasons that an attic may be frightening. In addition, these other eerie elements are often specifically associated with a basement:

It is even more cramped and inspires claustrophobia even more than an attic or a
basement, reducing movement to a slow, even potentially painful, crawl.

It is dirty and may be stuffy or musty.

Its pipes, joists, beams, and other obstructions impede movement and/or escape.

Animal carcasses could be present or their bones may be scattered inside the crawlspace. (John Wayne Gacy buried the bodies of many of his victims in his house’s crawlspace, and a lesbian stalker lived in her victim’s crawlspace.)

Tunnels from the crawlspace could lead elsewhere.

Note: As its title implies, the movie Crawlspace featured this setting.

Hotel

It is large, both in space and in the number of rooms, allowing multiple possibilities of ambush, for being trapped, or for having one’s escape cut off.

It is full of strangers, some or all of whom may be hostile or untrustworthy.

As a guest, one is in a dependent role.

Others have keys to one’s room or suite.

It could be haunted.

It operates on a 24-hour, seven-days-a-week basis, even while one is asleep and, therefore, vulnerable).

One could get stuck in an elevator, between floors.

Who knows what extra ingredients could be added to a drink in the hotel’s cocktail lounge or to a meal served in the hotel’s restaurant or delivered by room service?

One or more of its employees could be replaced by imposters.

Any weakness in its security could be exploited.

Its surveillance cameras are watching guests all the time, everywhere.

It could be isolated; even when it is not, it is a self-contained and relatively self-sufficient world unto itself (a total institution) of great resources.

It can feature fountains or statues in its lobby and courtyards or grounds.

It can harbor strange sights and sounds (and smells).

Its floor plans could be like a mazes, and, behind each door, a possible threat could wait to ambush a guest.

Power may fail.

Fog or other atmospheric or meteorological effects may occur.

Insects, animals, or humans may intrude.

Note: Stephen King’s short story “1408” takes place in a hotel, as does the movie, 1408, based upon it; King’s novel (and the movie based upon it), The Shining also takes place in a hotel.

Mansion

Many of the eerie elements associated with a hotel are also associated with a mansion, making a mansion scary for the same reasons that a hotel may be frightening. In addition, these other eerie elements are often specifically associated with a mansion:

Things look different in the dark than they do in the light.

It is isolated behind walls and iron gates, obscured by trees and other vegetation.

Its ornamentation and decoration may be odd (demon doorknockers, gargoyles,
bizarre statues or portraits).

It is associated with an ancestry and heirs (in other words, the house has a past, as it were, which may be filled with guilty secrets).

Its library may contain forbidden books.

“What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?” What, indeed!

It may have an evil-looking façade or aura (as does the House of Usher, the
Amityville house, and Ed Gein’s house).

Its grounds may contain the family’s private cemetery.

It can be personified (“if these walls could only talk!”).

Almost by definition, abandoned houses are scary (they suggest the fragility of life, or relationships, of stability, and a person, too, as a former resident, may be fragile, unstable, or abandoned.)

It could be really haunted or it could become “haunted” (e. g., as a Halloween fund-raiser), attracting real ghosts or demons.

Its various rooms symbolize various aspects of the personality, as dream dictionaries indicate.

An ascent can become a descent.

What was left behind in an abandoned mansion (a mirror, a birdcage, a cabinet, an organ) could be demonic.

Abandoned and in a state of disrepair, it is apt to be unsafe because of weak floors or stairs or crumbling ceilings or walls.

Note: Many horror stories, both in print and on film, including The Amityville Horror, Rose Red, ‘Salem’s Lot, Psycho, and The Haunting of Hill House being but a few of the better known among them, are set, in full or in large part, in mansions.

Island

It is remote and inaccessible.

It may be inhabited by “savages” and/or strange and dangerous plants and animals.

It is at the “mercy” of the sea.

It may contain caverns, mountains, or forests that are habitats for unusual, or even bizarre, and threatening menaces of a vegetative, animal, or human nature.

It may have an odd shape (Skull Island) that is frightening in itself.

It may have been used for nefarious purposes.

It may be volcanic.

It may suggest an alternative evolutionary origin.

Note: The Island of Dr. Moreau, King Kong, Jurassic Park, and many other novels and movies take place upon islands.

Friday, December 5, 2008

Music Hath Alarms To Evoke The Savage Beast

copyright 2008 by Gary L. Pullman


As we saw, in an earlier post, the lyrics to The Doors’ songs can be suggestive of horror stories. We imagined, based upon the following words, to “L‘america,” the coming of apparently “friendly strangers”--perhaps aliens disguised as humans--to a small town for the purpose of abducting the village’s women so that the abductors might ravish them, thereby perpetuating a hybrid version of their own race, the men of the town seeking, in vain, to prevent the women’s abductions and rape:

Friendly strangers came to town
All the people put them down
But the women loved their ways
Come again some other day
Like the gentle rain
Like the gentle rain that falls. . . .

The lyrics to the band’s song “The End,” with their obviously Freudian undertone, could easily be the basis of a horror story in which a killer kills because of unresolved Oedipal feelings:
The killer awoke before dawn
He took a face from the ancient gallery
And he walked on the down the hall
He went into the room where his sister lived
And then he
Paid a visit to his brother
And then he
He walked on down the hall, and
And he came to a door
And he looked inside
Father. Yes, son? I want to kill you
Mother, I want to [epithet deleted] you
Oooh, all last night. . . .


Couldn’t the following words, from “Riders on the Storm,” have inspired a movie like The Hitcher or even Flannery O‘Connor’s short story, “A Good man Is Hard To Find”?

There’s a killer on the road
His brain is squirming like a toad
Take a long holiday
Let your children play
Give this man a ride
Sweet family will die
In fact, as Songfacts explains, “‘killer on the road’ is a reference to a screenplay” that Jim Morrison “wrote called The Hitchhiker (An American Pastoral),” in which he “was going to play the part of a hitchhiker who goes on a murder spree.”

The words to songs like these stir the creative juices in writers, especially horror writers, because they are evocative and because they touch upon macabre subject matter. At the same time, they are vague or ambiguous, open-ended enough to allow one to place his or her own interpretations upon their possible meanings and to develop even a single block of verse or an entire song’s body of lyrics into not merely one, but several, possible plots. As Morrison said, concerning “The End,“ the song’s meaning “could be almost anything you want it to be” (Songfacts).

The Doors’ songs are especially rich in evoking images of horror that could be developed into complete stories, but other bands’ songs also can inspire horror story ideas. Take this line, for example, from The Beatles’ “I Am the Walrus”:
Yellow matter custard, dripping from a dead dog’s eye. . . .
As Songfacts indicates, John Lennon, who wrote this particular song, said he penned these lyrics to vex scholars who might attempt explications of the song’s lyrics, some lines of which, by Lennon’s own admission, were inspired by his ingestion of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). (As Songfacts indicates, there are many other sources for the lines of this song as well.)
If Stephen King’s Desperation starts to get creepy with a family’s spotting of a dead cat nailed to a highway sign, where might King be led by such an image as The Beatles have created? Such images can lead any writer of horror down a similar highway.


Not only can song lyrics inspire horror stories, but, in some cases, the opposite is also true: horror stories have also occasioned songs. An example? The title of The Jam’s song, “The Dreams of Children,” was inspired, Songfacts explains, by Clive Barker’s short story “The Forbidden,” in which the villainous Candyman “kills to preserve his reputation, so he can haunt ‘The Dreams of Children,’” and the song itself was inspired, in part, by The Beatles’ “Revolver”:
Prior to writing the song Paul Weller had been listening to his favourite album, The Beatles “Revolver.” Weller recalls in the book 1000 UK #1 Hits by Jon Kutner and Spencer Leigh, “After we'd finished recording the album Setting Sons, I asked the engineer if he could record the album backwards and put it on cassette. When I listened to it there was one piece of vocal that I really liked and wrote "The Dreams Of Children" around it.”
Musicians tell us that music is an expression of emotion; as the name by which the genre is known indicates, so is horror fiction. The emotion, horror (or one of its close relatives, such as anxiety, fear, or revulsion), is evoked by many of the same images and sentiments that music with a macabre theme expresses. Therefore, music and fiction, including horror fiction, are natural complements to one another, at times, at least, and the writer should not overlook the millions of possibilities for inspiration that exist in music. (In fact, Stephen King often listens to rock and roll as he writes his novels, and many of his books contain excerpts of song lyrics or acknowledgments to various musical artist’s works.)

Paranormal vs. Supernatural: What’s the Diff?

Copyright 2009 by Gary L. Pullman

Sometimes, in demonstrating how to brainstorm about an essay topic, selecting horror movies, I ask students to name the titles of as many such movies as spring to mind (seldom a difficult feat for them, as the genre remains quite popular among young adults). Then, I ask them to identify the monster, or threat--the antagonist, to use the proper terminology--that appears in each of the films they have named. Again, this is usually a quick and easy task. Finally, I ask them to group the films’ adversaries into one of three possible categories: natural, paranormal, or supernatural. This is where the fun begins.

It’s a simple enough matter, usually, to identify the threats which fall under the “natural” label, especially after I supply my students with the scientific definition of “nature”: everything that exists as either matter or energy (which are, of course, the same thing, in different forms--in other words, the universe itself. The supernatural is anything which falls outside, or is beyond, the universe: God, angels, demons, and the like, if they exist. Mad scientists, mutant cannibals (and just plain cannibals), serial killers, and such are examples of natural threats. So far, so simple.

What about borderline creatures, though? Are vampires, werewolves, and zombies, for example, natural or supernatural? And what about Freddy Krueger? In fact, what does the word “paranormal” mean, anyway? If the universe is nature and anything outside or beyond the universe is supernatural, where does the paranormal fit into the scheme of things?

According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, the word “paranormal,” formed of the prefix “para,” meaning alongside, and “normal,” meaning “conforming to common standards, usual,” was coined in 1920. The American Heritage Dictionary defines “paranormal” to mean “beyond the range of normal experience or scientific explanation.” In other words, the paranormal is not supernatural--it is not outside or beyond the universe; it is natural, but, at the present, at least, inexplicable, which is to say that science cannot yet explain its nature. The same dictionary offers, as examples of paranormal phenomena, telepathy and “a medium’s paranormal powers.”

Wikipedia offers a few other examples of such phenomena or of paranormal sciences, including the percentages of the American population which, according to a Gallup poll, believes in each phenomenon, shown here in parentheses: psychic or spiritual healing (54), extrasensory perception (ESP) (50), ghosts (42), demons (41), extraterrestrials (33), clairvoyance and prophecy (32), communication with the dead (28), astrology (28), witchcraft (26), reincarnation (25), and channeling (15); 36 percent believe in telepathy.

As can be seen from this list, which includes demons, ghosts, and witches along with psychics and extraterrestrials, there is a confusion as to which phenomena and which individuals belong to the paranormal and which belong to the supernatural categories. This confusion, I believe, results from the scientism of our age, which makes it fashionable for people who fancy themselves intelligent and educated to dismiss whatever cannot be explained scientifically or, if such phenomena cannot be entirely rejected, to classify them as as-yet inexplicable natural phenomena. That way, the existence of a supernatural realm need not be admitted or even entertained. Scientists tend to be materialists, believing that the real consists only of the twofold unity of matter and energy, not dualists who believe that there is both the material (matter and energy) and the spiritual, or supernatural. If so, everything that was once regarded as having been supernatural will be regarded (if it cannot be dismissed) as paranormal and, maybe, if and when it is explained by science, as natural. Indeed, Sigmund Freud sought to explain even God as but a natural--and in Freud’s opinion, an obsolete--phenomenon.

Meanwhile, among skeptics, there is an ongoing campaign to eliminate the paranormal by explaining them as products of ignorance, misunderstanding, or deceit. Ridicule is also a tactic that skeptics sometimes employ in this campaign. For example, The Skeptics’ Dictionary contends that the perception of some “events” as being of a paranormal nature may be attributed to “ignorance or magical thinking.” The dictionary is equally suspicious of each individual phenomenon or “paranormal science” as well. Concerning psychics’ alleged ability to discern future events, for example, The Skeptic’s Dictionary quotes Jay Leno (“How come you never see a headline like 'Psychic Wins Lottery'?”), following with a number of similar observations:

Psychics don't rely on psychics to warn them of impending disasters. Psychics don't predict their own deaths or diseases. They go to the dentist like the rest of us. They're as surprised and disturbed as the rest of us when they have to call a plumber or an electrician to fix some defect at home. Their planes are delayed without their being able to anticipate the delays. If they want to know something about Abraham Lincoln, they go to the library; they don't try to talk to Abe's spirit. In short, psychics live by the known laws of nature except when they are playing the psychic game with people.
In An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult and Supernatural, James Randi, a magician who exercises a skeptical attitude toward all things alleged to be paranormal or supernatural, takes issue with the notion of such phenomena as well, often employing the same arguments and rhetorical strategies as The Skeptic’s Dictionary.

In short, the difference between the paranormal and the supernatural lies in whether one is a materialist, believing in only the existence of matter and energy, or a dualist, believing in the existence of both matter and energy and spirit. If one maintains a belief in the reality of the spiritual, he or she will classify such entities as angels, demons, ghosts, gods, vampires, and other threats of a spiritual nature as supernatural, rather than paranormal, phenomena. He or she may also include witches (because, although they are human, they are empowered by the devil, who is himself a supernatural entity) and other natural threats that are energized, so to speak, by a power that transcends nature and is, as such, outside or beyond the universe. Otherwise, one is likely to reject the supernatural as a category altogether, identifying every inexplicable phenomenon as paranormal, whether it is dark matter or a teenage werewolf. Indeed, some scientists dedicate at least part of their time to debunking allegedly paranormal phenomena, explaining what natural conditions or processes may explain them, as the author of The Serpent and the Rainbow explains the creation of zombies by voodoo priests.

Based upon my recent reading of Tzvetan Todorov's The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to the Fantastic, I add the following addendum to this essay.

According to Todorov:

The fantastic. . . lasts only as long as a certain hesitation [in deciding] whether or not what they [the reader and the protagonist] perceive derives from "reality" as it exists in the common opinion. . . . If he [the reader] decides that the laws of reality remain intact and permit an explanation of the phenomena described, we can say that the work belongs to the another genre [than the fantastic]: the uncanny. If, on the contrary, he decides that new laws of nature must be entertained to account for the phenomena, we enter the genre of the marvelous (The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre, 41).
Todorov further differentiates these two categories by characterizing the uncanny as “the supernatural explained” and the marvelous as “the supernatural accepted” (41-42).

Interestingly, the prejudice against even the possibility of the supernatural’s existence which is implicit in the designation of natural versus paranormal phenomena, which excludes any consideration of the supernatural, suggests that there are no marvelous phenomena; instead, there can be only the uncanny. Consequently, for those who subscribe to this view, the fantastic itself no longer exists in this scheme, for the fantastic depends, as Todorov points out, upon the tension of indecision concerning to which category an incident belongs, the natural or the supernatural. The paranormal is understood, by those who posit it, in lieu of the supernatural, as the natural as yet unexplained.

And now, back to a fate worse than death: grading students’ papers.

Product Cloud

You Tube Player

Loading...

Say What Translator

My Cup of Blood

Anyone who becomes an aficionado of anything tends, eventually, to develop criteria for elements or features of the person, place, or thing of whom or which he or she has become enamored. Horror fiction--admittedly not everyone’s cuppa blood--is no different (okay, maybe it’s a little different): it, too, appeals to different fans, each for reasons of his or her own. Of course, in general, book reviews, the flyleaves of novels, and movie trailers suggest what many, maybe even most, readers of a particular type of fiction enjoy, but, right here, right now, I’m talking more specifically--one might say, even more eccentrically. In other words, I’m talking what I happen to like, without assuming (assuming makes an “ass” of “u” and “me”) that you also like the same. It’s entirely possible that you will; on the other hand, it’s entirely likely that you won’t.

Anyway, this is what I happen to like in horror fiction:

Small-town settings in which I get to know the townspeople, both the good, the bad, and the ugly. For this reason alone, I’m a sucker for most of Stephen King’s novels. Most of them, from 'Salem's Lot to Under the Dome, are set in small towns that are peopled by the good, the bad, and the ugly. Part of the appeal here, granted, is the sense of community that such settings entail.

Isolated settings, such as caves, desert wastelands, islands, mountaintops, space, swamps, where characters are cut off from civilization and culture and must survive and thrive or die on their own, without assistance, by their wits and other personal resources. Many are the examples of such novels and screenplays, but Alien, The Shining, The Descent, Desperation, and The Island of Dr. Moreau, are some of the ones that come readily to mind.

Total institutions as settings. Camps, hospitals, military installations, nursing homes, prisons, resorts, spaceships, and other worlds unto themselves are examples of such settings, and Sleepaway Camp, Coma, The Green Mile, and Aliens are some of the novels or films that take place in such settings.

Anecdotal scenes--in other words, short scenes that showcase a character--usually, an unusual, even eccentric, character. Both Dean Koontz and the dynamic duo, Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child, excel at this, so I keep reading their series (although Koontz’s canine companions frequently--indeed, almost always--annoy, as does his relentless optimism).

Atmosphere, mood, and tone. Here, King is king, but so is Bentley Little. In the use of description to terrorize and horrify, both are masters of the craft.

A bit of erotica (okay, okay, sex--are you satisfied?), often of the unusual variety. Sex sells, and, yes, sex whets my reader’s appetite. Bentley Little is the go-to guy for this spicy ingredient, although Koontz has done a bit of seasoning with this spice, too, in such novels as Lightning and Demon Seed (and, some say, Hung).

Believable characters. Stephen King, Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child, and Dan Simmons are great at creating characters that stick to readers’ ribs.

Innovation. Bram Stoker demonstrates it, especially in his short story “Dracula’s Guest,” as does H. P. Lovecraft, Edgar Allan Poe, Shirley Jackson, and a host of other, mostly classical, horror novelists and short story writers. For an example, check out my post on Stoker’s story, which is a real stoker, to be sure. Stephen King shows innovation, too, in ‘Salem’s Lot, The Shining, It, and other novels. One might even argue that Dean Koontz’s something-for-everyone, cross-genre writing is innovative; he seems to have been one of the first, if not the first, to pen such tales.

Technique. Check out Frank Peretti’s use of maps and his allusions to the senses in Monster; my post on this very topic is worth a look, if I do say so myself, which, of course, I do. Opening chapters that accomplish a multitude of narrative purposes (not usually all at once, but successively) are attractive, too, and Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child are as good as anyone, and better than many, at this art.

A connective universe--a mythos, if you will, such as both H. P. Lovecraft and Stephen King, and, to a lesser extent, Dean Koontz, Bentley Little, and even Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child have created through the use of recurring settings, characters, themes, and other elements of fiction.

A lack of pretentiousness. Dean Koontz has it, as do Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child, Bentley Little, and (to some extent, although he has become condescending and self-indulgent of late, Stephen King); unfortunately, both Dan Simmons and Robert McCammon have become too self-important in their later works, Simmons almost to the point of becoming unreadable. Come on, people, you’re writing about monsters--you should be humble.

Longevity. Writers who have been around for a while usually get better, Stephen King, Dan Simmons, and Robert McCammon excepted.

Pacing. Neither too fast nor too slow. Dean Koontz is good, maybe the best, here, of contemporary horror writers.

Popular Posts